User Controls
Posts by gadzooks
-
2019-01-08 at 4:46 PM UTC in oh fraw lawThe way you word that actually brings up a really valid debate... Who's responsibility are condoms?
I've noticed that very few women make any kind of effort, let alone insist, that I use a condom, which is kinda surprising since usually these are women I've only known for a few hours. I always just assumed they're on the pill; otherwise, I figure they'd be like "no glove, no love" or whatever.
Although of course there's a lot more to worry about than accidental pregnancy...
I dunno, I just always found it strange - even a bit unsettling - that I've never faced any resistance whatsoever for not having condoms on my person.
Heck, I've even had a few chicks specifically request that I don't wear a condom... Like, what's her agenda here?
Does it really make that much of a difference for her? Can women really feel the difference between a bare cock and one wrapped in rubber? -
2019-01-08 at 4:27 PM UTC in Is Yoel Romero or Tyron Woodley more terrifying?Neither are as terrifying as your mom in the morning right before I kick her out of bed.
-
2019-01-08 at 4:25 PM UTC in If we were friends in real life and I had a chance to fuck your wife or girlfriend...
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson "Bros before hoes" as they say in the Acres Homes area of Houston.
I'm pretty sure they say that everywhere.
Heck, it (or some variation thereof) was probably one of the first sequences of verbal vocalizations ever uttered by homo sapiens way back in cave-dwelling days. -
2019-01-08 at 4:08 PM UTC in In general, drugs that cause you to eat and sleep less than normal...
Originally posted by cupocheer In general, drugs that cause you to eat and sleep less than normal…
2019-01-08 at 12:07 AM CST
Report #1
WellHung
African Astronaut
Are more dangerous than drugs that do not…
Double speak.
Has no basis in fact.
Wut? How exactly is that double speak? It exactly seems to be drawing a pretty clear connection/correlation between two observable phenomena:
A) Taking drugs that tend to adversely affect sleep and nutrition.
B) Long-term damage.
The problem, however, is that this observation is only really correlational, and does not establish causality.
I don't think I'd call that "doublespeak". -
2019-01-08 at 4:03 PM UTC in In general, drugs that cause you to eat and sleep less than normal...
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life Let's compare sedatives like booze and opiates and stimulants like caffeine and speed by deaths, injuries and long term damage.
Are you sure?
Because I'm pretty sure if we do that, opiates and alcohol become like a holocaust compared to stimulants.
Like I mentioned above, these debates get tricky because different studies, and even different definitions of causality, and so on, can result in all kinds of different interpretations of the data.
I mean, are we including, say, bodily damage and deaths caused by lowered inhibitions from alcohol ==> bar fights and domestic violence?
What about motor vehicle accidents?According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, 37,133 people died in traffic crashes in 2017 in the United States (latest figures available), including an estimated 10,874 people who were killed in drunk driving crashes involving a driver with an illegal BAC (.08 or greater).
Then there is the long-term damage (from alcohol) seen in cirrhosis of the liver, Korsakoff's syndrome, etc, etc.
And what about needle sharing ==> hepatitis C and HIV?
Of course, stimulants can be administered intravenously, but I'm pretty sure most IV drug users are opiate using them for opiates primarily (admittedly, I could be wrong on that - it's just intuition and personal experience that I'm basic that on).
And finally, do we count deaths caused by contaminants in the drugs?
Even though there have been cases of fentanyl being used as a cutting agent in stimulants and other non-opiate drugs, it's primarily used to cut heroin, and thus leads to more opiate-based deaths. There are also a lot of addicts actively seeking fentanyl because of how strong it is compared to the straight heroin that dealers are selling that is cut to absolute shit (and this is from direct observation - a close friend of mine keeps asking me if I know how to synthesize fentanyl yet). -
2019-01-08 at 3:51 PM UTC in If we were friends in real life and I had a chance to fuck your wife or girlfriend...
-
2019-01-08 at 2:17 PM UTC in If we were friends in real life and I had a chance to fuck your wife or girlfriend...
-
2019-01-08 at 1:31 PM UTC in Post pictures of beautiful people
Originally posted by Narc Shit gadzooks, you're not a faggot an all are you?
Lol, nah.
I just included a bunch of dudes' pictures for the sake of equality, and because, to be honest, I can appreciate the aesthetic value of some males.
Romantically, and sexually, I am pretty much exclusively attracted to women. -
2019-01-08 at 12:56 PM UTC in In general, drugs that cause you to eat and sleep less than normal...
Originally posted by Sophie It's because GABA is involved in a lot more than just how chill you feel. It literally regulates how excited or inhibited some parts of your brain are. It also helps with muscle tension. The brain is always trying to get to a point of homeostasis. If you take excessive benzos your brain will be inhibited up to the point tolerance through various mechanisms that not only lay with GABAergic neurons start of processes to get back to homeostasis. If you then suddenly stop taking the benzos, it's not like your brain can turn these countermeasures off on command.
The difference in withdrawel is due to the nature of the role that the endogenous equivalent fulfills.
So then it seems that GABAerigcs are actually just as harmful as stimulants. They clearly cause literal brain damage (although obviously reversible by simply tapering off and resuming a non-intoxicated state).
Or is the general argument here that stimulants actually do permanent / irreversible damage (while GABAergics, and opiates for that matter, do not)? -
2019-01-08 at 12:49 PM UTC in People you admire, look up to, or revere in some way
-
2019-01-08 at 12:45 PM UTC in Post pictures of beautiful people
-
2019-01-08 at 12:41 PM UTC in Post pictures of beautiful people
Originally posted by Mewsik Have a nice day zooks. Or shoke on one of your drugs … your choice 👍
Holy fuck, you take things way too seriously.
Try letting loose and relaxing.
Maybe drugs are precisely what you're missing in your life, because being that wound up can't possibly be anything but pathological. -
2019-01-08 at 12:39 PM UTC in Post pictures of beautiful people
Originally posted by Mewsik So because your interpretation of the thread title which says “post pictures of beautiful people” SOLEY means physical - that there for is the the spirit?
Wow
First of all, as as I pointed out above, the word "beautiful" has pretty standard definition when referring to people.
I'm pretty sure if this thread was meant to be about people "of decent character", it would have specified as such. Zanick has to be one of those most eloquent/articulate posters on this entire site. I highly doubt he'd have a hard time finding the right words in such a case.
Also...
Originally posted by Zanick Nigga I'm not trying to convince anybody, just post people whose faces you really like.
-
2019-01-08 at 12:32 PM UTC in Post pictures of beautiful people
-
2019-01-08 at 12:29 PM UTC in Post pictures of beautiful peopleFor listing (and describing why) people whom you find "beautiful" "on the inside":
https://niggasin.space/thread/32507 -
2019-01-08 at 12:28 PM UTC in Post pictures of beautiful peopleITT: Niggas who don't how to use a dictionary.
According to a simple Google search:beau·ti·ful
/ˈbyo͞odəfəl/
adjective
adjective: beautiful
pleasing the senses or mind aesthetically.
"beautiful poetry"
synonyms: attractive, pretty, handsome, good-looking, nice-looking, pleasing, alluring, prepossessing, as pretty as a picture; More
lovely, charming, delightful, appealing, engaging, winsome;
ravishing, gorgeous, heavenly, stunning, arresting, glamorous, irresistible, bewitching, beguiling;
graceful, elegant, exquisite, aesthetic, artistic, decorative, magnificent;
bonny;
informalhot, tasty, divine, knockout, drop-dead gorgeous, fanciable, beddable, easy on the eye;
informalfit, smashing;
informalcute, foxy;
informalbeaut, spunky;
formalbeauteous;
archaiccomely, fair;
raresightly, pulchritudinous
"a beautiful young woman"
antonyms: ugly
of a very high standard; excellent.
"she spoke in beautiful English"
Clearly physical attributes are the dominating theme here, so having a decent personality does not automatically make someone "beautiful".
Also, the part about high standards implies that you can't just claim to "see the beauty in everyone." -
2019-01-08 at 12:19 PM UTC in What are you doing at the moment
-
2019-01-08 at 12:15 PM UTC in i have taken a cock tonight....
-
2019-01-08 at 12:02 PM UTC in Post pictures of beautiful people
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny dalai lama is a terrorist.
hes actually the osama of the buddhists.
ill post it if i manage to find the footage of him trainning bald headed, ak47 weilding buddhist monks somewhere in tibet.
Wow.
I Thank'd this post because it offers a unique perspective that I had never actually considered.
Most people consider him a "hero" and a "freedom fighter" for standing up against China's oppression.
But you could say the exact same thing about Osama Bin Laden and America/Israel and their allies.
Although this video of the Dalai Lama actually training gun-toting terrorists does seem a bit far-fetched to me. It would be pretty compelling evidence if it exists. -
2019-01-08 at 11:58 AM UTC in People you admire, look up to, or revere in some wayHere you go Mewsik... Here is where you can post about the Dalai Lama and Thomas Edison, and so on.
Here are a few (although by no means is this an exhaustive compendium)...
Aristotle: One of the first true polymaths. This dude literally wrote the book(s) on just about everything (politics, ethics, physics, metaphysics, biology, rhetoric, poetics, etc).
Leonardo da Vinci: The quintessential polymath (artist, engineer, scientist, etc).
Friedrich Nietzsche: Philosopher from the turn of the 20th century who is known for some pretty radical ideas, such as the notion of "perspectivism", and the value of suffering and adversity for a good life. He also coined the phrase "God is dead."
Roger Penrose: A contemporary polymath. He has published scholarly research in areas ranging from quantum physics to the physics and neurobiology of consciousness.
Those are just a few of mine to get things started. I may add some more later.
