User Controls
Post pictures of beautiful people
-
2019-01-08 at 1:09 PM UTC
-
2019-01-08 at 1:12 PM UTC
-
2019-01-08 at 1:15 PM UTCNo benny, it's definitely a faggot.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2019-01-08 at 1:18 PM UTC
-
2019-01-08 at 1:20 PM UTCBecause that is also what a real man would say when some idiot posted a pic of a faggot claiming it to be a man. Its literally exactly what a real man would say in that situation.
. -
2019-01-08 at 1:31 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc Shit gadzooks, you're not a faggot an all are you?
Lol, nah.
I just included a bunch of dudes' pictures for the sake of equality, and because, to be honest, I can appreciate the aesthetic value of some males.
Romantically, and sexually, I am pretty much exclusively attracted to women. -
2019-01-08 at 1:42 PM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-01-08 at 2:53 PM UTCFuckinglol^
. -
2019-01-08 at 3 PM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-01-08 at 3:13 PM UTCSoyboy IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life African Astronaut [the oppositely able-bodied hop-step-and-jump]
-
2019-01-08 at 5:21 PM UTC
-
2019-01-08 at 5:31 PM UTC
-
2019-01-08 at 11:06 PM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks For listing (and describing why) people whom you find "beautiful" "on the inside":
https://niggasin.space/thread/32507
If I threw you a rock, with a certificate that stated the rocks interior contained a giant nugget of gold .... is that rock still just a rock or is it now gold? When you look at that rock, what will you see? -
2019-01-09 at 12:21 AM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks First of all, as as I pointed out above, the word "beautiful" has pretty standard definition when referring to people.
I'm pretty sure if this thread was meant to be about people "of decent character", it would have specified as such. Zanick has to be one of those most eloquent/articulate posters on this entire site. I highly doubt he'd have a hard time finding the right words in such a case.
Also…
As Zanick said later on, not in his OP “post pictures of faces YOU really like” which is precisely what I did.
Why don’t you follow OP’s lead, and stop trying to convince me or anyone else what beauty is.
You really have zero understanding of what or how I see people. Guess what, it’s really none of your business. You won’t because you see people your own way, and are to busy trying to convince me I’m wrong or illiterat e (so annoying lanny). That’s your loss. -
2019-01-09 at 12:39 AM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-01-09 at 12:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by gadzooks First of all, as as I pointed out above, the word "beautiful" has pretty standard definition when referring to people.
I'm pretty sure if this thread was meant to be about people "of decent character", it would have specified as such. Zanick has to be one of those most eloquent/articulate posters on this entire site. I highly doubt he'd have a hard time finding the right words in such a case.
Also…
Essentially this (with much gratitude for the praise). However, if you feel that their moral character is manifest in their physical appeal, that's certainly welcome. I am not a gatekeeper of beauty, perceived through sight or feeling. The purpose of this thread is not to produce agreements with regard to a universal form, only to share in the subjective experience of desire.
I'm very pleased with the posts I've seen thus far. We may be an impoverished lot, but our spirits are still healthily lustful.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-01-09 at 1:08 AM UTC
Originally posted by Mewsik As Zanick said later on, not in his OP “post pictures of faces YOU really like” which is precisely what I did.
Why don’t you follow OP’s lead, and stop trying to convince me or anyone else what beauty is.
You really have zero understanding of what or how I see people. Guess what, it’s really none of your business. You won’t because you see people your own way, and are to busy trying to convince me I’m wrong or illiterat e (so annoying lanny). That’s your loss.
You are wrong. Your definition of "beauty" is factually incorrect.
And if you take me pointing that out as a personal insult, that's your problem, not mine.
Also, it's worth point out that you did not post a single picture of these people's "beautiful faces".
I'm dying to see what the face of an "old couple holding hands" looks like.
Also, you really need to learn to take someone disagreeing with on the Internet, especially on a site like this, without getting all angry and defensive.
It's okay, though. RELAX, nigga. Shit... -
2019-01-09 at 1:09 AM UTCSoyboy IV: The Flower of Death and The Crystal of Life African Astronaut [the oppositely able-bodied hop-step-and-jump]
Christophe Dettinger -
2019-01-09 at 1:15 AM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick Essentially this (with much gratitude for the praise). However, if you feel that their moral character is manifest in their physical appeal, that's certainly welcome. I am not a gatekeeper of beauty, perceived through sight or feeling. The purpose of this thread is not to produce agreements with regard to a universal form, only to share in the subjective experience of desire.
I'm very pleased with the posts I've seen thus far. We may be an impoverished lot, but our spirits are still healthily lustful.
I just want to take this opportunity to point out two things:
1. I totally get what Mewsik means when she says that she sees the Dalai Lama and "old couples holding hands" as "beautiful". She's not wrong to consider that a sight to behold, or worth admiration. Heck, I even made another thread specifically for posting about stuff like that. She's the one that escalated it to Internet rage (the most impotent form of rage, tbh).
2. Notice how she didn't post a single picture of these so-called "beautiful people." She also unfairly called Hitler "ugly" just because she assumed he never smiles.
Her definition of beauty isn't "wrong", it's just not quite accurate, or topically relevant (but perfectly worth discussing - hence me making that other thread for such discussions). -
2019-01-09 at 1:19 AM UTC
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
