User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by Obbe
-
2018-06-16 at 9:51 AM UTC in Laterlol, the guy who gets pissed on thinks cats are dirtyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-16 at 9:07 AM UTC in Later
Originally posted by Obbe I can remember glimpses of it from pictures he's posted, but no, I do want to see it. I want details. If malice had a documentary about his life I would watch it.
from - https://niggasin.space/post/358561
notice how grimy it is along the skirting boards, i did gave him lots of shit about it at the time.
.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-16 at 3:50 AM UTC in DH transplants: moving on is for the best.
Originally posted by ohfralala Then why do you guys keep making thread after fucking thread about it?
I mean you do realize that sorta makes you exactly like how you just described us, right?
Is this a serious reply?
Do you want to think about it and try to answer it yourself before I make you look like a fool? -
2018-06-16 at 1:59 AM UTC in DH transplants: moving on is for the best.You don't belong to your shitty site, specially not any more. Nobody here knows who you are except your own internal circlejerk, and the only thing it does is cause shitty gay threads where you shit talk each other and all call each other insane liars. Nobody cares. The only one making you participate in your old dramas and animosities... is you.
To most space niggas, most of you come across as either probably mentally ill, or committed to being losers because you came in from a forum called "Date Hotel". These are not good looks. It benefits nobody.
An old enemy stalking you? Spamming at the very sight of your username? Do you want to legitimately participate, and have had enough? Make a new account with a new handle they won't recognize easily, and just post. You will be fine.
Or don't, idc. But this drama is boring garbage. -
2018-06-16 at 12:22 AM UTC in How about "other perspectives"?Maybe it is pure nostalgia and confirmation bias talking but I feel like Totselings are very unique in terms of the users they generate. Even the endemically grown retards are of a superior quality to others. Raw data for raw nerves indeed.
Most of the DHers I saw pretty much came across like fucking children. Their biggest troll was some insane tranny who made tons of ALTs to Thank its own shitty version of edginess and garbage GIFs, for internet points. Off the top of my head, I cannot think of a sadder, more pointless investment of one's time without specifically making one up. -
2018-06-15 at 1:28 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs AttentionWell, I went to college for psychology, before I let any guy even flirt with me, then I used copious amounts of drugs for years from all over the spectrum in which I almost killed myself with multiple times but went back to anyway.
I’m sober for the most part now. But I still don’t like to let most guys hit on me and I haven’t let anyone touch me in several years.
I think we have more in common than you understand, probably because I don’t write giant posts up about myself lolololThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-10 at 5 PM UTC in The Rape Escape Game?ITS APE ESCAPE YOU DENSE FUCKS
-
2018-06-08 at 6:21 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Captain So this is the exact problem I foresaw in my last post, and that's why I asked that we just discuss the standard "potential" argument, because the explanation I gave is more of an advancement of that position. This does not pose any challenge to my moral system.
The tl;dr answer (if you don't want to do it that way), is that if JP knew this for sure, and believes that if the situation was reversed, he himself would have no right to life as the doomed child, them I don't see any moral problem with JP's actions. The fact is, the information available to one does matter in one's moral considerations: it is what makes the difference between an act of ignorance or malice. Me giving money to a child in Africa might cause a butterfly effect* that does bad shit, but that doesn't factor into my moral considerations.
So your ethics have changed then, and we're now concerned with intentions (did JP have the intention to harm a morally considerable being). And this seems like an odd, foot in both camps, sort of ethics. The thing that makes the child considerable is that in the future they're going to become an adult, but the thing makes you right or wrong for torturing a kid is your belief in wether or not they're going to become an adult. Actually it seems like moral considerability in fact has nothing to do with moral action.
You're also condoning the torture of children who won't live to be a certain age which, uhh, well that's a pretty distasteful conclusion and I'm not sure you really believe it.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-08 at 12:09 AM UTC in Nazis Now Own Largest Worldwide Agri-chems Production CapacityThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-07 at 9:55 PM UTC in Deleted posts for: infinityshock balls deep in lannyniggers esophagus and he likes it
Originally posted by RisiR † Poor little bebby. Is this all you got?
this is exponentially more than what i intended.
if i didnt have to be in front of my screen 'waiting' i wouldnt even have posted the first alt.
like i said...check my posting times for yourself. i dont sleep and i dont have a job. if i wanted to i could shit-spam this site until lanny shuts it off. IP blocking wont work.
the key is...i dont give a fuck.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-07 at 9:38 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatThey once did a study on pro cyclists and found that pure vegetarians were the least fit unable to train and race. Your best bet is to have a balanced diet and remove all junk fod including all unnecessary additives. Plus no drugs, smoking or hard drinking. Still you can get ill due to environmental factors and your chances of a healthier life are only slightly better depending on genetics and makeup of individuals. Most veggies grown now also have some contamination and pollution doesn't help. Mercury free fish are almost non existant and even water used to clean vegatables can leave impurities or residue where time for shipping can be crucial. A small town outside of Rome has the longest living residents and it's all related to working hard, eating traditional foods of the ethnic group, better traditional farming methods, reducing stress and having fun in your life.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-07 at 7:50 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-07 at 7:47 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-07 at 7:32 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by aldra yeah, on that same note morality isn't necessarily relative just because people interpret it differently
Being able to arrive at different conclusions through various interpretations, with there being no previous concrete answers, means that something is not absolute, therefore relative.
Coming up with a wrong answer to a math problem just means you don’t know how to do the math.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-07 at 7:28 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-07 at 7:19 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Obbe I don't know. Do you believe morality is absolute? I think there are a lot of reasons to believe it is relative. Don't really have the time or desire to write a huge post about it. But, for example, different parts of the world developed different ideas about what is and is not moral. But I don't think any culture developed different ideas about math. 1+1 doesn't equal 3 in any culture I have heard of. Do you really think it is accurate to compare morality to math?
my point was only that people disagreeing on something doesn't mean that they're all right.
as it stands morality is used and shaped as a tool for social cohesion, differently for different societies, but yes I believe there's an absolute baseline. there's no way to prove or disprove it though so I don't think it's really worth discussingThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-07 at 6:17 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Lanny Posting what you had for dinner isn't really a discussion of the ethics[/] of eating meat,
ethics ??? i thot this thread was about the MORALITY, or the lack of it while consuming meats.
none say anything about ethics, now go bann yourself for posting, and attempting to derail this thread into a thread about ethics of eating meat.
oh, on topic related :
all living things, big or small, plant or animals, are sentient beings.A video posted on the Chinese social media site Weibo showed the small crustacean struggling out of a bowl of piping hot spicy soup.
But the creature realised one of its claws was slowing its escape and without any hesitation used its other claw to slice it off and wriggle free.
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/crayfish-cuts-claw-escape-being-12642053
with some semblance of intelligence.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-07 at 5:54 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Captain I was going to write a longer response to Lanny but I'm going to make things a lot simpler:
Sure, let's call it potential to participate in the social contract
OK, so let's suppose Joe Psychopath happens upon a healthy looking child who's like, IDK, 4 or 5 or something. An age before they can appreciate the idea of a social contract. Joe tortures the child inflicting a lot of pain a maiming them for life. Joe goes on his way thinking he's done a good job of ruining or significantly degrading the child's life.
But there's a twist: unbeknownst to anyone, the child has a rare heart condition that's going to cause him to die in a few months or years. The universe is, per your assumption, deterministic meaning the child will die inevitably. The child's person also never extends forwards far enough to participate in a social contract and thus never had potential to do so.
In such a case, under your model, we seem committed to say Joe Psychopath did nothing wrong as the temporally extended child is not morally considerable. Now of course we can't say he was justified in torturing the child as he had no way to know that the child was not morally considerable, but we would seem to have to say he serendipitously avoided doing wrong by harming a morally irrelevant being. -
2018-06-07 at 5:03 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Lanny So would you say that it's the potential to respect a social contract that makes a thing morally considerable? Or do you propose some kind of non-temporal essence of persons (souls?) that confers moral considerability ? Or something else?
In a way.
Essentially, my morality is essentially Golden Rule operated under the veil of ignorance. For example, I would not want someone to have killed me as a kid, so I don't do it to
If
- the universe is deterministic
- time is a dimension
- the evolution of the system we call our universe (aka motion) is essentially based on our change in position along that t-axis, which appears to be the independent variable in this case.
By this logic I am lead to believe that all the past and future states of this system "exist". We simply happen to be reading the states that correspond to one point along that axis.
From this, I come to conclude that you either are or are not worthy of moral consideration, there is no question of becoming it.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-07 at 3:19 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Lanny Human children below a certain age aren't able to observe laws or respect a social contract either. Do you think they're also excluded from moral consideration as well?
I don't view a person as a vertical slice at one point in time. A human child can and will eventually grow to respect a social contract. An animal will not.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
