User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by Obbe
-
2019-01-11 at 9:26 AM UTC in Zanick's "evil sister" here, AMA
Originally posted by Zanick I help people who make money keep making money. Even Canadians can understand why that's a good thing.
I'm going to bed, I'll be back to resume this AMA tomorrow.
You're not 'making money' unless you're a banker who's literally conjuring it out of thin air. You're just helping accumulate it, and I hope you contract polio from someone breaking into your house and shitting in your mouth while you're sleeping.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-01-04 at 10:36 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Lanny Speedy parker, your last two posts are not acceptable given the topic of this thread and the forum it's made in.
^ Looks like he's not the only one, so why don't you just take your hypocritical fail-ass out of the thread, stop harassing and chasing users off the site, and then go fuck yourself?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2019-01-04 at 7:09 AM UTC in Mobile Site LogoutMake it an expanding menu type dealie that opens up a confirmation thingie. I'm a derp and my fat fingers ever so gently graze the logout button at least once a day, leading to me having to furiously retype my credentials.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-12-25 at 5:03 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatIt's about pretending moral obligation is real and would we then have to not eat meat. Nobody has an imagination anymore.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-12-25 at 4:54 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-12-25 at 4:44 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Lanny A moral obligation is something that you ought to do, not conditioned upon motivation. There are some things you are obligated to do if you you want to see some result come about. Moral obligations are those things that should be done for their own sake.
so you mean moral obligations are things that people do for no reason whatsoever ?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-21 at 9:40 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny so people should be unrepresented ?
Wut?
I'm basically saying the exact opposite.
I truly believe in the legal principle that everyone should have the right to a fair trial.
I could actually see myself being a criminal defense attorney for that exact reason.
Very few people have the constitution for it though because they would feel morally conflicted about representing someone whom they believe to be guilty of some especially heinous crime.
My point was that, while I may believe my client to be guilty, and I may find their actions to be morally condemnable, I am still not betraying my own ethical or moral principles within this particular scope of morality.
Thus, morality and ethics are still one and the same concept.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-21 at 12:35 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by gadzooks If you spend three years in law school and still haven't learned about legal ethics, you done fucked up somehow.
If you don't believe in the legal system (i.e. the right to a fair trial - a right to which EVERYONE is entitled to - regardless of the crime they are alleged to have committed), then don't become a lawyer.
It's not rocket science.
you asked for examples of something that are morally wrong but ethically right, i gabe you just that.
defending a person whos guilty of child mollestation is just morelly wrong even if your tuat persons attorney, but to direllict your duties to defend him would just be plain unethical.
there.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-21 at 12:57 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Lanny My point about the moral issues involved in eating meat was made by the many on topic posts I've made in this thread.
My point about posting on topic or getting banned was made by banning infinityshock when he repeatedly posted off topic and just generally acted obnoxious without addressing any of the arguments made in this thread.
This thread is not for the discussion of moderation policy, if you'd like to gripe about that, you can go make a thread in a different forum.
your retarded outlook on the entirety of existence...much less on anything related to morality...has zero validity due to not only your biased position from an excess of female hormones that adversely affect your judgement...but your constant state of intoxication resulting in permanent and severe brain damage.
every post you/your fag-alts made regarding eating meat was shot down and handily contradicted by the more mentally capable posters around here. the entirety of your/your faggot alts position is based on illicit-pharmaceutical-induced delusional rantings
go back and read the post i made that you referred to, you cum-drooling fucktard...it was completely on topic and wholly related to the premise of the thread title, idiot.
to recap:
Originally posted by infinityshock the scientific explanation for why OP is such a bitch:
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-menstrualpain-soy-formula-idUSKCN1NF01D
that was the post you referred to. you took offense because i called out your OP on page-1/post-1 and cited valid scientific studies showing soy-bitches are inherently mentally defective.
Originally posted by Lanny You were not going to post in this thread anymore because you apparently are incapable of keeping it on topic, as demonstrated by this post.
you post too much while in an estrogen-fueled stupor.
Originally posted by infinityshock ill have to edit that referenced post to include you and your own PMSing in that assessment. way to continue reinforcing my evaluation of you that youre suffering from severe estrogen toxicity and perpetual pussy TSS. along with full-tard retardation.
since youre not only a fucking retard but drain brammaged due to excessive alcohol consumption, ill clarify this for you:
1- the topic of this thread is the mental deficiency of not eating meat.
2- multiple posters and countless posts refer to alternatives to consuming animal protein due to the fact that the human animal will die without consuming protein in its diet.
b. multiple posters and countless posts refer to the specific alternative of soy products as an animal-protein alternative.
4. the actual article i posted is a combination of actual studies performed by actual scientists on both niggers and humans on the actual effects of failing to provide actual animal proteins to a developing child.
17. the post i made is wholly relevant and on topic due to addressing the affects of the thread title. due to previously stated scientific studies it is obvious that the human animal is not designed to exist without consuming protein at the expense of consuming an animal protein source, proving the OP a failed belief system.
12. youre an idiot
now stfu and go eat more tofu so your pussy cramps snap your hips
theres also another scientific study i found somewhere describing the effects of providing dogs with zero animal protein, high carbohydrates, and low values of plant-based protein and how sick it made them. if i ever get bored enough ill post it.
Originally posted by Lanny You are wrong, we will not discuss this, and if you post in this thread again you will be banned.
out-standing reply, ethanol boy. of course we wont discuss it...ill shit all over you and your delusions like a rhinoceros after OD-ing on 'exlax'...a week long taco bell binge...and a block of C4 detonating up its asshole.
its adorable how a zero-effort post from me results in such severe feminine itching and burning on your labia.
same reason you stopped relying to my PMs. youre not up to the standards of being titled 'bitch'...if you were in prison the bitches would make you their bitch.
all you need to know is the extent of your flimsy authorit-aiyyy is to ban me from one single site...this one...which has a negative alexa rating...while being completely impotent as i post what i want...whenever i want...from any other site on the interwebs.
youre going to feel stupid when youre writhing around on the ground...helpless to escape your impending rape...after your excessive soy consumption causes an estrogen toxicity reaction to the extent that your menstrual cramps snap your child-bearing hips like a geriatric granny falling down the stairs from the top floor of a skyscraper and finally landing on the railroad tracks in front of a speeding freight train.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-19 at 3:24 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs AttentionWas this site always this shitty?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-12-13 at 6:48 PM UTC in The meaning of life is to give life meaning.
Originally posted by Cro Mango Meanings are an operational instrument that this grotesque meat monstrosity uses to parse its interactions with the world. The meaning of life… Is a vacuity. It fails its own tests.
I think the whole idea is that you're allowed to fill that vacuous void with your own meaning.
That's what makes it such a bold statement.
It's the elevation of meanings as mere operational instruments (only of extrinsic value) to the status of intrinsic value, truly embedded in the framework of reality.
You don't have to agree, but that's why it's philosophy.
There is no definitive answer, only a series of dialogue leading to even more questions.
And a whole lot of anal fisting.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-13 at 6:33 PM UTC in The meaning of life is to give life meaning.
Originally posted by Cro Mango Today in trite platitudes
All Goatse and anal streching aside, how is it a trite platitude?
It's actually based on some profound philosophy that was built up over the course of hundreds of years.
There was a time when even considering a meaning in life other than worshiping God, or "the gods", or whatever diety/dieties ruled your universe, was a thought-crime of the highest order.
Then eventually, iconoclasts started positing their own meanings (altruism, beauty, hedonism, etc).
Some were ridiculed; others burned at the stake.
But then someone like Nietzsche comes along, following in the footsteps of the German Enlightenment philosophers like Hegel, Kant, and Schopenhauer, and he basically establishes that there is no inherent meaning to life.
And ultimately, this gives way to his interpretation that meaning is to come from the individual.
This individuality gave rise to all kinds of movements, including the Existentialist way of thinking (although the notion was already blossoming from Kierkegaard and the like).
So at the end of the day, if stretching your anus as widely as you possibly can is your personal idea of meaning in a world of chaotic meaninglessness, then you have just discovered that Goatse man was a true Ubermensch, and an exemplar for all to follow when they find themselves in need of meaning in life.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-12 at 9:48 PM UTC in Smoking weed causes cancer
Originally posted by GGG Lol "slightly carcinogenic"
https://www.le.ac.uk/ebulletin-archive/ebulletin/news/press-releases/2000-2009/2009/06/nparticle.2009-06-17.html
The argument you're talking about comes from this
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1277837/
also another thing you all have to consider is that ciggarettes are engineered smoke while pots, due to its illegal status, remained somewhat natural and and are consumed no more different today than they are 200 years ago.
while on the other hand cigarettes are engineered in every way imaginable from the soil to the fertilizer to the cellulose enhancements down to cigarette papers. things will change now that they legalize pot. big money will come in, and pots will be engineered to give maximum profit at the cost of its consumers.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-08 at 2:52 PM UTC in My daughter just died
-
2018-12-08 at 1:27 PM UTC in My daughter just died
Originally posted by GGG He's just neglectful, not abusive.
If its a troll, that's a severely fucked up thing to troll about. Especially for a parent. Like… You don't do that. You don't joke about that.
I have his daughter's information thanks to legal documents (luv u texas) so if it shows up in obituaries i guess I'll be able to figure it out. Willing to give it to certain parties who i can trust not to post it.
This very post .. IMO is just as bad as assuming this thread is false and posting that it is. Anyone who assumes it is, and is 1/2 way decent simply wouldn’t post in it if they did.
Did you ever consider for one moment, to simply keep your “mouth shut” about what you had and seek the information on your own, privately? And when you could confirm this is NOT a troll thread, share your condolences and assure the community this is a very sad time for a family?
Clearly the community knows you are a Bill Krozby hater. If you simply stated your condolences after your fact discovery ... that would have been the right thing to do.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-08 at 1 PM UTC in My daughter just died
Originally posted by GGG You do know you can search birth records by father name yeah? It wasn't hard. It's public record here. Already had Bill Krozbys name and address, as well as the names and addresses of his family. I forget who dumped it here.
Whatever you say, I don't believe you have krôZ' daughters info and if you do you are even more of horrible person then I could ever imagine.
I do believe that you are all a bunch of PI rats with no lives. I already knew that.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-12-08 at 12:47 PM UTC in My daughter just diedIt's true, all the people saying this is a troll thread are all the same ones who make shitty kroz hate threads all the time.
Like seriously you people need to get a life instead of following króz around and getting triggered every time he posts. Like §m£ÂgØL 'doxing his daughter' and people posting his name and gay shit like that.
You are typical keyboard warriors and it's the same group of people that would never post a pic of themselves or cam up. Can you imagine being such a bitch all you do is say "hurr króz is rapist he abandoned daughter Derrr!" And then you bitch out when it comes to real confrontation.
Pathetic.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-11-24 at 6:53 AM UTC in Share one good quality about yourself.I’m extremely great @ keeping my calm
Probably coulda been one of those musicians who played songs as the Titanic went down
Or at least somebody next to the band saying something like
“Hai, you guys know any Aerosmith”
*singing*
Cuz I don’t wanna miss a thang!
❤️
*toke*
😋The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-11-20 at 2:57 AM UTC in Transhumanism: Sanctity of the Human Essence
Originally posted by PhD in Condom Mechanics With prosthetics getting better and better, it is only a matter of time before engineering and advances in material science will create prosthetic body parts that are superior to the ones fashioned by mother nature.
This is speculation without, I think, great support. Yes, science and engineering has made a lot of "progress" in recent history, but it's not like there's a singular track along which these fields move, as the term "progress" seems to imply, and no promise that any such track passes through the set of things necessary to create the prosthetics you're describing. I'm not saying it's impossible by any means, perhaps even likely, I'm just saying it's not inevitable, it's not a mere matter of time.According to many philosophers, such as John Searle, human consciousness and the mind are an irreducible product of our physical, biological processes; that the neurochemistry itself is integral part of your human experience, and the process is important, rather than just the functional outcome. So you might be able to create a computer that can directly output the same answers as a human, but the subprocesses themselves are irreplaceable in generating the experience of consciousness and experience.
Would you care to present Searle's arguments for the, or your own?What is not to be ignored, is the fact that you have important neurons in every living part of your body. Very important, in fact:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140901090301.htm
Yes, it's been a well understood fact that some degree of information processing happens in the peripheral nervous system. Lettvin was doing research along just those lines in the 50s.Evolution is a thrifty artificer: it finds hacks and shortcuts to cut corners wherever it can, and reuses absolutely everything, because every excess calorie can be a matter of life and death in nature, so these tiny advantages do statistically change the gene pool. And every inch of our skin does math, and surely many other clusters of neurons must have similar properties and values, because it's a fact of neuroscience that our brain receives reports from every part of the body, the neural system is somewhat "irreducible", every neuron that dies within you constitutes a significant change in the state of the broader network. Your "consciousness" is pretty much spread throughout your whole body.
What's significant here? You (the speaking agent) can essentially lose communication with half your brain and not be able to notice. It's well understood that the brain is a massively redundant system that's constantly damaged without losing measurable degrees of function.
The fact that information processing happens in the peripheral nervous system doesn't seem to be sufficient to say your whole body is conscious. We can find brains not connected to hands that seem to be having pretty similar conscious experience to when they were. When we find hands not connected to brains, they don't really show any indication of having experience.
Are you familiar with theories of extended mind? I'm actually pretty sympathetic to them, I think you would be too. If you think information processing that happens in your skin is part of your consciousness, why not information processing that happens when you consult a notebook or interact with some tool which provides tactile feedback? But have we lost any of our "essence" when we loose a book, or some tool we're using breaks? We may lose some function, in some sense, but it seems quite intuitive to say that there is some conscious kernel of ourselves that survives loss of both biological and non-biological (a basically arbitrary distinction) information processing faculties.Furthermore, the nature of processing in our nervous system is fundamentally different than it is in silicon computing presently.
The nature of processing that happens in some neurons is fundamentally different than the processing that happens in others. Our nervous system is composed of a heterogeneous collection of neurons that work in different ways. Are just some of those neurons actually part of our conscious experience and others are inert? Which? When one sort of neuron takes on the role of another, as can happen after damage, is that experience not actually restored, and the recovery of associated function somehow non-conscious?
Of course not. It's a fact of neurology that parts of our nervous system are functionally replaceable, and unless you hold some really strange ideas about what what happens to consciousness in such situations, for which I don't think you can gather any evidence, then you're committed to the notion that replacing parts of the nervous system with functionally equivalent but materially different parts doesn't necessarily affect the conscious experience that's actualized by its working.Your consciousness is not as accurate as a silicon computer. It would processes the gentle softness of the lover's skin rather than tell you the exact amount it deforms under what stress. It is imperfect in a way, but it's process and specific nature is integral to producing the richness of the manifest image of man.
Suddenly, the scent of a woman becomes the report of the chemical composition of your air intake. You lose your qualia and you receive data.
At the physical/chemical level all you ever had was data to start with. From nose to brain, woman-scent was never anything other than electrochemical signals. Conscious experience is an emergent property of that physical system, and in fact an emergent process of many very similar but distinct physical systems across the span of the experience. It should be obvious that different physical configurations can give rise to analogous, similar, or identical experiences because cookies smell the same this week as they did last week but the physical system facilitating that experience is in a different, potentially quite different, state than it was last week.
So if different configurations of neurons can give rise to the same experience, why not different configurations of matter which give rise to the same structure?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-11-19 at 1:07 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by DietPiano If the requirement for moral consideration is that something can feel pain, then the killing of the bebes that have nerve cells is moral wrongness in your moral system ???
So is all medicine. If something is ill, it should be injected with a lethal dosage of opioids and killed.
Even if it will get better by itself. Our sole prerogative should be minimising pain.
Got a flu? It's euthanasia for you, bucko.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
