User Controls

We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat

  1. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Is that how you prove your point? By threatening to abuse your admin CP?

    My point about the moral issues involved in eating meat was made by the many on topic posts I've made in this thread.

    My point about posting on topic or getting banned was made by banning infinityshock when he repeatedly posted off topic and just generally acted obnoxious without addressing any of the arguments made in this thread.

    This thread is not for the discussion of moderation policy, if you'd like to gripe about that, you can go make a thread in a different forum.
  2. Speedy Parker Black Hole [my absentmindedly lachrymatory gazania]
    Originally posted by Lanny My point about the moral issues involved in eating meat was made by the many on topic posts I've made in this thread.

    My point about posting on topic or getting banned was made by banning infinityshock when he repeatedly posted off topic and just generally acted obnoxious without addressing any of the arguments made in this thread.

    This thread is not for the discussion of moderation policy, if you'd like to gripe about that, you can go make a thread in a different forum.

    Your posts about the moral aspect of anything are shit until you learn the difference between morals and ethics.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. Loing African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker Your posts about the moral aspect of anything are shit until you learn the difference between morals and ethics.

    At this point, it is obvious that you don't know what the difference is yourself.
  4. infinityshock Black Hole
    Originally posted by Lanny My point about the moral issues involved in eating meat was made by the many on topic posts I've made in this thread.

    My point about posting on topic or getting banned was made by banning infinityshock when he repeatedly posted off topic and just generally acted obnoxious without addressing any of the arguments made in this thread.

    This thread is not for the discussion of moderation policy, if you'd like to gripe about that, you can go make a thread in a different forum.

    your retarded outlook on the entirety of existence...much less on anything related to morality...has zero validity due to not only your biased position from an excess of female hormones that adversely affect your judgement...but your constant state of intoxication resulting in permanent and severe brain damage.

    every post you/your fag-alts made regarding eating meat was shot down and handily contradicted by the more mentally capable posters around here. the entirety of your/your faggot alts position is based on illicit-pharmaceutical-induced delusional rantings

    go back and read the post i made that you referred to, you cum-drooling fucktard...it was completely on topic and wholly related to the premise of the thread title, idiot.

    to recap:

    Originally posted by infinityshock the scientific explanation for why OP is such a bitch:

    https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-menstrualpain-soy-formula-idUSKCN1NF01D

    that was the post you referred to. you took offense because i called out your OP on page-1/post-1 and cited valid scientific studies showing soy-bitches are inherently mentally defective.

    Originally posted by Lanny You were not going to post in this thread anymore because you apparently are incapable of keeping it on topic, as demonstrated by this post.

    you post too much while in an estrogen-fueled stupor.

    Originally posted by infinityshock ill have to edit that referenced post to include you and your own PMSing in that assessment. way to continue reinforcing my evaluation of you that youre suffering from severe estrogen toxicity and perpetual pussy TSS. along with full-tard retardation.

    since youre not only a fucking retard but drain brammaged due to excessive alcohol consumption, ill clarify this for you:

    1- the topic of this thread is the mental deficiency of not eating meat.

    2- multiple posters and countless posts refer to alternatives to consuming animal protein due to the fact that the human animal will die without consuming protein in its diet.

    b. multiple posters and countless posts refer to the specific alternative of soy products as an animal-protein alternative.

    4. the actual article i posted is a combination of actual studies performed by actual scientists on both niggers and humans on the actual effects of failing to provide actual animal proteins to a developing child.

    17. the post i made is wholly relevant and on topic due to addressing the affects of the thread title. due to previously stated scientific studies it is obvious that the human animal is not designed to exist without consuming protein at the expense of consuming an animal protein source, proving the OP a failed belief system.

    12. youre an idiot

    now stfu and go eat more tofu so your pussy cramps snap your hips

    theres also another scientific study i found somewhere describing the effects of providing dogs with zero animal protein, high carbohydrates, and low values of plant-based protein and how sick it made them. if i ever get bored enough ill post it.

    Originally posted by Lanny You are wrong, we will not discuss this, and if you post in this thread again you will be banned.

    out-standing reply, ethanol boy. of course we wont discuss it...ill shit all over you and your delusions like a rhinoceros after OD-ing on 'exlax'...a week long taco bell binge...and a block of C4 detonating up its asshole.

    its adorable how a zero-effort post from me results in such severe feminine itching and burning on your labia.

    same reason you stopped relying to my PMs. youre not up to the standards of being titled 'bitch'...if you were in prison the bitches would make you their bitch.

    all you need to know is the extent of your flimsy authorit-aiyyy is to ban me from one single site...this one...which has a negative alexa rating...while being completely impotent as i post what i want...whenever i want...from any other site on the interwebs.

    youre going to feel stupid when youre writhing around on the ground...helpless to escape your impending rape...after your excessive soy consumption causes an estrogen toxicity reaction to the extent that your menstrual cramps snap your child-bearing hips like a geriatric granny falling down the stairs from the top floor of a skyscraper and finally landing on the railroad tracks in front of a speeding freight train.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. D4NG0 motherfucker
    Originally posted by infinityshock out-standing reply, ethanol boy. of course we wont discuss it…ill shit all over you and your delusions like a rhinoceros after OD-ing on 'exlax'…a week long taco bell binge…and a block of C4 detonating up its asshole.

    glad to see you're back
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. D4NG0 motherfucker
    WAIT. NO!

    LANNY you motherfucker! You banned him again. Fuck you.
  7. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by D4NG0 WAIT. NO!

    LANNY you motherfucker! You banned him again. Fuck you.

    You can sway a thousand men by appealing to their prejudices quicker than you can convince one man by logic.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by D4NG0 WAIT. NO!

    LANNY you motherfucker! You banned him again. Fuck you.

    Everyone should turn on Lanny.
  9. Lanny Bird of Courage
    you guys should post on topic :)
  10. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Speedy Parker learn the difference between morals and ethics.

    I'm pretty sure there's no difference.

    You're talking semantics / splitting hairs.
  11. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    I implore someone to give me just ONE example of something being MORALLY right yet ETHICALLY wrong, or vice versa.
  12. Loing African Astronaut
    Originally posted by gadzooks I'm pretty sure there's no difference.

    You talking semantics / splitting hairs.

    There's a difference but he doesn't know what it is. That's why he won't say what the difference is.
  13. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Loing There's a difference but he doesn't know what it is. That's why he won't say what the difference is.

    But there really isn't, though.

    See my above post where I implore someone to give a concrete example.
  14. Loing African Astronaut
    Originally posted by gadzooks But there really isn't, though.

    See my above post where I implore someone to give a concrete example.

    Sh.
  15. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Loing Sh.

    No idea what that refers to...

  16. God put animals here to serve us
    Eating them is our sacred duty
  17. Originally posted by gadzooks I implore someone to give me just ONE example of something being MORALLY right yet ETHICALLY wrong, or vice versa.

    doctor-patient confidentiality.

    attorney-client confidentiality.

    non-disclosure agreememts.

    i can go on but im tired.
  18. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Nobody has a moral obligation to adopt someone else's dietary opinions or preferences.
  19. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny doctor-patient confidentiality.

    attorney-client confidentiality.

    non-disclosure agreememts.

    i can go on but im tired.

    So you morally oppose all of the above forms of confidentiality?

    Or do you mean that there are specific scenarios in which they will conflict?

    If you follow ethical guidelines but are absolutely convinced that you are doing something immoral, you have a duty to do what's morally right.

    Don't become a doctor if you disagree with the guidelines.

    I would be 100% comfortable with abiding by confidentiality because I believe in it.

    In fact, let's even take a highly controversial example just to be extra sure...

    Let's say I'm a lawyer, and I know that my client is guilty, I can still defend them because of the morally greater good of abiding by the letter and spirit of the law.

    If someone can't handle such situations, they have no business being doctors, lawyers, etc.
  20. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Again, it comes down to splitting hairs.

    You might feel "MORALLY" compelled to do one thing while you are "ETHICALLY" compelled to do another.

    But you're just using inconsistent definitions of "MORAL" and "ETHICAL".
Jump to Top