User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by Obbe
-
2018-12-08 at 1:27 PM UTC in My daughter just died
Originally posted by GGG He's just neglectful, not abusive.
If its a troll, that's a severely fucked up thing to troll about. Especially for a parent. Like… You don't do that. You don't joke about that.
I have his daughter's information thanks to legal documents (luv u texas) so if it shows up in obituaries i guess I'll be able to figure it out. Willing to give it to certain parties who i can trust not to post it.
This very post .. IMO is just as bad as assuming this thread is false and posting that it is. Anyone who assumes it is, and is 1/2 way decent simply wouldn’t post in it if they did.
Did you ever consider for one moment, to simply keep your “mouth shut” about what you had and seek the information on your own, privately? And when you could confirm this is NOT a troll thread, share your condolences and assure the community this is a very sad time for a family?
Clearly the community knows you are a Bill Krozby hater. If you simply stated your condolences after your fact discovery ... that would have been the right thing to do. -
2018-12-08 at 1 PM UTC in My daughter just died
Originally posted by GGG You do know you can search birth records by father name yeah? It wasn't hard. It's public record here. Already had Bill Krozbys name and address, as well as the names and addresses of his family. I forget who dumped it here.
Whatever you say, I don't believe you have krôZ' daughters info and if you do you are even more of horrible person then I could ever imagine.
I do believe that you are all a bunch of PI rats with no lives. I already knew that. -
2018-12-08 at 12:47 PM UTC in My daughter just diedIt's true, all the people saying this is a troll thread are all the same ones who make shitty kroz hate threads all the time.
Like seriously you people need to get a life instead of following króz around and getting triggered every time he posts. Like §m£ÂgØL 'doxing his daughter' and people posting his name and gay shit like that.
You are typical keyboard warriors and it's the same group of people that would never post a pic of themselves or cam up. Can you imagine being such a bitch all you do is say "hurr króz is rapist he abandoned daughter Derrr!" And then you bitch out when it comes to real confrontation.
Pathetic. -
2018-11-24 at 6:53 AM UTC in Share one good quality about yourself.I’m extremely great @ keeping my calm
Probably coulda been one of those musicians who played songs as the Titanic went down
Or at least somebody next to the band saying something like
“Hai, you guys know any Aerosmith”
*singing*
Cuz I don’t wanna miss a thang!
❤️
*toke*
😋 -
2018-11-20 at 2:57 AM UTC in Transhumanism: Sanctity of the Human Essence
Originally posted by PhD in Condom Mechanics With prosthetics getting better and better, it is only a matter of time before engineering and advances in material science will create prosthetic body parts that are superior to the ones fashioned by mother nature.
This is speculation without, I think, great support. Yes, science and engineering has made a lot of "progress" in recent history, but it's not like there's a singular track along which these fields move, as the term "progress" seems to imply, and no promise that any such track passes through the set of things necessary to create the prosthetics you're describing. I'm not saying it's impossible by any means, perhaps even likely, I'm just saying it's not inevitable, it's not a mere matter of time.According to many philosophers, such as John Searle, human consciousness and the mind are an irreducible product of our physical, biological processes; that the neurochemistry itself is integral part of your human experience, and the process is important, rather than just the functional outcome. So you might be able to create a computer that can directly output the same answers as a human, but the subprocesses themselves are irreplaceable in generating the experience of consciousness and experience.
Would you care to present Searle's arguments for the, or your own?What is not to be ignored, is the fact that you have important neurons in every living part of your body. Very important, in fact:
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2014/09/140901090301.htm
Yes, it's been a well understood fact that some degree of information processing happens in the peripheral nervous system. Lettvin was doing research along just those lines in the 50s.Evolution is a thrifty artificer: it finds hacks and shortcuts to cut corners wherever it can, and reuses absolutely everything, because every excess calorie can be a matter of life and death in nature, so these tiny advantages do statistically change the gene pool. And every inch of our skin does math, and surely many other clusters of neurons must have similar properties and values, because it's a fact of neuroscience that our brain receives reports from every part of the body, the neural system is somewhat "irreducible", every neuron that dies within you constitutes a significant change in the state of the broader network. Your "consciousness" is pretty much spread throughout your whole body.
What's significant here? You (the speaking agent) can essentially lose communication with half your brain and not be able to notice. It's well understood that the brain is a massively redundant system that's constantly damaged without losing measurable degrees of function.
The fact that information processing happens in the peripheral nervous system doesn't seem to be sufficient to say your whole body is conscious. We can find brains not connected to hands that seem to be having pretty similar conscious experience to when they were. When we find hands not connected to brains, they don't really show any indication of having experience.
Are you familiar with theories of extended mind? I'm actually pretty sympathetic to them, I think you would be too. If you think information processing that happens in your skin is part of your consciousness, why not information processing that happens when you consult a notebook or interact with some tool which provides tactile feedback? But have we lost any of our "essence" when we loose a book, or some tool we're using breaks? We may lose some function, in some sense, but it seems quite intuitive to say that there is some conscious kernel of ourselves that survives loss of both biological and non-biological (a basically arbitrary distinction) information processing faculties.Furthermore, the nature of processing in our nervous system is fundamentally different than it is in silicon computing presently.
The nature of processing that happens in some neurons is fundamentally different than the processing that happens in others. Our nervous system is composed of a heterogeneous collection of neurons that work in different ways. Are just some of those neurons actually part of our conscious experience and others are inert? Which? When one sort of neuron takes on the role of another, as can happen after damage, is that experience not actually restored, and the recovery of associated function somehow non-conscious?
Of course not. It's a fact of neurology that parts of our nervous system are functionally replaceable, and unless you hold some really strange ideas about what what happens to consciousness in such situations, for which I don't think you can gather any evidence, then you're committed to the notion that replacing parts of the nervous system with functionally equivalent but materially different parts doesn't necessarily affect the conscious experience that's actualized by its working.Your consciousness is not as accurate as a silicon computer. It would processes the gentle softness of the lover's skin rather than tell you the exact amount it deforms under what stress. It is imperfect in a way, but it's process and specific nature is integral to producing the richness of the manifest image of man.
Suddenly, the scent of a woman becomes the report of the chemical composition of your air intake. You lose your qualia and you receive data.
At the physical/chemical level all you ever had was data to start with. From nose to brain, woman-scent was never anything other than electrochemical signals. Conscious experience is an emergent property of that physical system, and in fact an emergent process of many very similar but distinct physical systems across the span of the experience. It should be obvious that different physical configurations can give rise to analogous, similar, or identical experiences because cookies smell the same this week as they did last week but the physical system facilitating that experience is in a different, potentially quite different, state than it was last week.
So if different configurations of neurons can give rise to the same experience, why not different configurations of matter which give rise to the same structure? -
2018-11-19 at 1:07 AM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by DietPiano If the requirement for moral consideration is that something can feel pain, then the killing of the bebes that have nerve cells is moral wrongness in your moral system ???
So is all medicine. If something is ill, it should be injected with a lethal dosage of opioids and killed.
Even if it will get better by itself. Our sole prerogative should be minimising pain.
Got a flu? It's euthanasia for you, bucko. -
2018-11-18 at 8:47 PM UTC in Do You Guys Think Rust Was A Little Obsessed?
Originally posted by Obbe I enjoyed arguing with Rust over God and spiritual things.
Yeap, Obbe is another O.G. member that I won't ever forget.
Rust was the strictest rationalist and skeptic.
You were his polar opposite. You embraced all kinds of new fangled spiritualities and perspectives.
I even have a few of our conversations saved away somewhere, just the two of us, and some with Rust as well; and sometimes they were quite vitriolic - but all in good fun.
You have been officially added to my list of classic Totse friends on here. -
2018-11-14 at 11:52 PM UTC in Is color actually real or does it only exist in our heads?Everything is actually dark. "Light" is waves, and we perceive different lengths of waves as "colours" painted over matter depending on how said matter resonates with light frequencies. Our eyes are really just affixing a physiological response to different radiation frequencies.
We are dirt things running around on a dark wet space rock!! ! -
2018-11-14 at 5:22 PM UTC in People who don't pick up their dogs shitDon't blame you mq, I'd do the same. Smear the dog turd under the handle so its on his hand when he goes to open his truck. Leave a note on the windshield telling him that's his dogs shit and if he keeps leaving it you'll keep giving it back to him.
. -
2018-11-14 at 1:05 PM UTC in People who don't pick up their dogs shitPiece of shit. :)
I work where there's this big field behind me and me and my friend like to go play catch out there with basebslls or toss the ole pigskin around or whatever but there's like a bunch of mounds of SHIT from the same doge alway and so we have to watch our step
The other week I fuckjng accidentally stepped in a pile and had to literally clean my shoe bottom out with a toothpick getting the poops out.
Point is. It's a field where slot of people let their dogfeys poop and they all have bags and pick up the poop like a GROWN ADULT IS APT TO DO but the one guy doesn't
AND I never knew who he was u til tonight when I went out to smoke and this dog was shittinf square away in the middle of the field (it's now snow covered so the shit is even more obvious when it's fresh cuz it's black on white) and then the owner just called him back and they both got Into his red pickup. Which I saw. So
The point of this is that the faggot thought he never knew anyone knew what he was doing, but now I know, and I know it was him, and I know his vehicle, and I'm gonna literally go out there and pick up all the shit and fucking throw it in the bed of his truck and smear it all over his windows.
That's all. -
2018-11-11 at 6:46 AM UTC in describe another user with a meme/stupid piccaptain falcon
§m£ÂgØL
Bill Krozby
mashlehash
reststop
-
2018-11-10 at 9:17 PM UTC in describe another user with a meme/stupid piccupocheer
spectral
sploo and roshambo
zanick
-
2018-11-10 at 9:16 PM UTC in describe another user with a meme/stupid picissue313/soyb0y/etc
lanny
mememe/narc
ohfralala
mmq
-
2018-11-10 at 9:16 PM UTC in describe another user with a meme/stupid pic1. these aren't necessarily 'memes', I just browsed through a bunch of the shit I've saved over the years and picked out ones that made me think of people here
2. I know I missed a lot of people. I'll do more later - I got maybe a quarter of the way through my list
C. some are obvious, some are shit in-jokes and some are just similar to a 'vibe' I get from people
4. the 5 images per post really fucked me
item9/actor
candy
HTS
dargo
infinityshock
- Item 9,
- HTS,
- GGG,
- mmQ,
- Obbe,
- mashlehash,
- MexicanMasterRace,
- Cheyes
-
2018-11-10 at 6:19 AM UTC in describe another user with a meme/stupid picfucking A++ top thread for subtlely ripping people
will post a wall of these when I get back to a computer -
2018-11-10 at 12:56 AM UTC in Sam Harris on the Illusion of Free WillAll the answers lay in each and every one of us. Stop reading, stop watching videos and TV. Be silent, connect with other human beings who have not polluted their bodies with poison their entire lives, or surrendered them selves and their ability to listen to their own knowing in a serene and compassionately way ... those who go inward and remember ... truth!
This idiot is an alien. He has no connection with his soul .. the only thing that never dies. Well .. that once was true, souls are burning out at a rapid speed. -
2018-11-06 at 7:22 PM UTC in Sam Harris on the Illusion of Free WillPLEASE NO
NOT THIS AGAIN
The nigh inevitability of this thread devolving into a protracted philosophical circlejerk is probably the strongest argument in favor of determinism. -
2018-11-05 at 11 PM UTC in How can a conscience be determined?Ok, there are two different things at play here:
1. A psychological conscience.
2. Morality.
A psychological conscience is the result of millions of years of evolution. Altruism has evolved in humans in order to create cohesive bonds built on reciprocative acts of goodness.
Now, when it comes to an objective source of morality, that is a much thornier issue.
One could argue that whatever nature gave us as a moral compass (i.e. a psychological conscience) should define morality, and that's that.
But of course, centuries of debate have arose surrounding such definitions of objective morality, or even if there can ever be such a thing. -
2018-11-04 at 4:48 PM UTC in Strippers & "sex workers" want your respectPretty sure they want ur money a lot more than they want ur respect. Ur a job, & I'm sure they have a lot less respect for u for being a cuck who gives ur money u worked hours for to them for a few minutes of their time.
- aldra,
- Obbe,
- kroz,
- HTS,
- Incognito2u,
- Narc,
- Jiggaboo_Johnson
-
2018-11-04 at 3:56 PM UTC in Strippers & "sex workers" want your respect
Originally posted by Obbe Probably personal preferences. Do you respect everybody automatically, or is your respect earned? Have you ever lost respect for anybody? What did it take for you to lose respect?
Thinking about it, I treat people respectfully or disrespectfully dependent on how they treat me, but I don't respect people. I don't hold anyone in disrespect either. I'm not sure I even know what it means to "respect someone". 😕