User Controls
Posts by infinityshock
-
2015-11-02 at 1:15 AM UTC in Night Ops - New Guy (TransHuman Edition)
Completely incorrect. First, there is indeed a limit but you're underestimating the eye. Without having tried it, it's hard to understand and I'll grant you your doubts.
However, 5 minutes clearly isn't enough time to research this because you don't understand that this stuff breaks the "seal" of "eyeball goo". A quick run down: DMSO has high permeation that absorbs down into the photoreceptors and Ce6 being DMSO soluable allows it to be carried by the DMSO along with the insulin. The insulin slows ABCG2 allowing the receptors to collect the Ce6. Ce6, being a photosensitizer used by plants, is then able to more effectively amplify light at the photoreceptor level itself. There is no dilation and this wouldn't improve night vision anyhow since they'll do that anyway in the dark. The same amount of light enters the eye but it is more efficiently processed thus making everything brighter than normal.
The result brings amplification close to the Gen I devices out there - not super - except that amplification is only the half of it. This comes with maximum human resolution and unobstructed FOV. Even if you absolutely champion electronic devices, this if nothing else makes them more efficient. Which is to say that lesser Gen devices are vastly improved in quality.
More info is in my linked topic in the first post here, however even though it's already effective and the amplification indeed not snake oil (to be snake oil doesn't it need to be sold?), the linked topic is "Phase One" for a reason. There are already improvements to the formula worked out that, sorry to say, are about to take a complete shit on electronic devices sans FLIR which will never happen at the photoreceptor level because you wouldn't be able to see past your eye's own thermal profile. For a quick reference, Google Ce6-AuNR bonding and the amplification level this produces in increasing available light within cells. I am actively funding and performing my own private research on ocular pathways, biochemistry, gold nanorod oscillation, rhodopsin, polyrhodopsin, etc. to further this field of improving - even if temporarily - human eyesight. If you're interested in hard numbers for amplification, those will probably be years down the road as other groups pick up the work. I am mostly doing this for my own benefit but have no trouble sharing the results of my progress.
my original analogy of OD-ing on meth isnt going to give someone the performance capability of a D9 bulldozer still stands. It is biologically / anatomically / physically impossible. it is the same as it applies to any 'booster' to human photoreceptors. if youre considering an uber-low quality, 1st-gen (or worse) electronic night-vision device as the baseline, then yes, it may be possible to artificially boost the human eye photoreceptors enough to be comparable. Ive never really had an issue with FOV on any electronic NVDs ive used...including monoculars.
I know what DMSO is, its permeability to membranes & limited ability to drag other substances along with it, and how insulin works...although how both of these substances interact to allow a phytochemical of dubious animal-effectiveness, to be topically (to the eye) applied, then pass so far through the eye to affect the photoreceptors, isnt something ive researched extensively enough to properly debate...but from what i know of the three substances and the human eyeball biology...along with 'user reports'...everything combined doesnt make sense. -
2015-11-02 at 12:49 AM UTC in My life sucks so muchthe true sign of intelligence is the ability to produce simplicity in its most basic form
overcomplicating something for no other reason than to fool yourself into appearing more intelligent (because no one else believes it) is a sign of a low self esteem -
2015-11-02 at 12:45 AM UTC in WWYD if you heard knocking on one of your windows in the middle of the night?empty a few magazines through the wall and window
go back to bed
let the local wildlife clean up whatever it was -
2015-11-02 at 12:30 AM UTC in Homosexuals are gay
Not half as gay as you wanting to fuck virtually every guy on multiple forums.
stop being greedy and jealous. i have enough dick to choke you and everyone else in your household.
get on with it...your tonsils arent going to choke themselves -
2015-11-01 at 8:44 PM UTC in Night Ops - New Guy (TransHuman Edition)first thing:
seriously...whomever runs this shit site needs to fix the bullshit auto-logoff timer that lasts for about 30 seconds. im about over typing up more than two sentences then having to re-log in and losing everything i typed. fortunately this time i cut-and-pasted what i wanted to post knowing full damned well what was going to happenIsn't that a bit like saying why carry a knife when that's what a blade is for? Ce6 is a form of night vision with significant advantages over electronic. If you've used night vision as I presume you claim, then you know damn well it sucks a load of dick because even the best devices out there will hamper your FOV. Why not just have a similar level of amplification without dealing with the bulky, troublesome device? It's not perfect, but for exploration it's a lot more fun and less of a hassle.
EDIT Happy Halloween everyone. No ops tonight, unless drinking counts.
regardless of the effectiveness of ce6 there is no way a biological pharmaceutical can cause the human eye to be as effective as an electronic device. there are physical biological limits regardless of any chemical additive. i.e., you cant give someone and overdose dosage of amphetamine and expect them to have the same physical performance as a bulldozer.
that...and from the five minutes of research on the substance that ive done it sounds like some sort of snake oil. human night vision is a factor of the way photoreceptor cells within the eyeball interact with photons. jamming some sort of glop onto the cornea isnt going to interact with the photoreceptor cells that are sealed inside the eyeball goo.
based on the 'experiences' described by users i read about, it sounds more like they have some version of a pupil dilator -
2015-11-01 at 8:22 PM UTC in Homosexuals are gay
You would know
indeed. your rampant displays of flagrant faggotry are all anyone needs to observe to discover the epitome of faggotry -
2015-11-01 at 8:21 PM UTC in I want to knock up my 17 year old next door neigbor
thAn -
2015-11-01 at 4:08 PM UTC in Whats an easy to fake injury?a stroke should work
use a hypodermic syringe to inject a few CCs of some sort of semi-viscous foreign liquid into your carotid artery.
motor oil should do the trick -
2015-11-01 at 4:07 PM UTC in kind of worried I may have got another girl pregnant
… it's even workable.
its not
-
2015-11-01 at 4:06 PM UTC in why are so many women bisexual?
^he's got a point. also Ive noticed the rise in bisexuality in guys and acceptance from women. my ex gf only watches gay male porn and always told me she'd think it would be hot if i fucked a guy
its because of the incessant media programming into the weak-minded
your ex-gf wants to date a fag...
-
2015-11-01 at 4:04 PM UTC in why are so many women bisexual?
Well their hormonal response is…..indescribably repulsive. I sometimes look at women and shake my head and think 'You sick whore, you lust after dicks.' And then I think how lucky I am that they do, because otherwise I would never get laid, but it's still fucked up if I think about it too much.
you lack foresight and suffer from societal programming
the ultimate goal of every higher organism, after survival, is reproduction. if the reproductive instinct werent so dominant it would result in extinction of the species. therefore, the society-induced farce that is the degradation of individuals that are sexually promiscuous is not only a threat to the human race but detrimental to the base programming of all higher life forms
in simplest terms...people are fucking stupid -
2015-11-01 at 4 PM UTC in My life sucks so much
What a coincidence. On the atomic scale, hyperspacial rotations occur at such speed that transition phases between extreme views cannot be resolved within the temporal precision of the experiment. The wave-particle dichotomy is refractory to scientific comprehension not only because an electron flips between its two phases faster than the instruments can follow, but also because both wave packets and particles are three-dimensional concepts. Mentally unable to comprehend ultratridimensional entities, physicists identify different projections of one subatomic particle as several new discoveries, and that is why there is no end to the number of elementary particles.
youre forgetting the fact that when mass (or lack thereof) decreases to the subatomic scale, all the conventional rules of quantum physics are null and void
and...stop using words that you have no idea what mean. -
2015-11-01 at 3:58 PM UTC in If you drive, I strongly recommend getting a dash cam...
i would but i wont
fixed
-
2015-11-01 at 3:57 PM UTC in Homosexuals are gayfaggots are fags
-
2015-11-01 at 3:57 PM UTC in I want to knock up my 17 year old next door neigborthats why god invented duct tape and roofies
and...post pics or youre a faggot -
2015-10-31 at 10:31 PM UTC in Night Ops - New Guy (TransHuman Edition)
As for the military thing, I was in the Army nearly 10 years ago and there's really no similarities to be drawn here. Also, grunts aren't given Chlorin E6 or freedom to explore where ever they want. In fact I'd say it's the anti-thesis of what makes night ops great. The freedom, exploration, and lack of valid backing if anything goes wrong.
i dont know what your military thing involved but when i was in i had more than a fair share of night ops. some of the best ones im pretty sure i cant even post
chlorin e6? wtf-ever. thats what night vision is for.
-
2015-10-31 at 10:28 PM UTC in If you drive, I strongly recommend getting a dash cam...
…Or just record your drive somehow, i.e. put a couple rubber bands on your visor and fasten you're phone and have it recording video while you're driving:
I'm not gonna go into to much detail but about a week ago[redacted I SO WISHED that I had that shit on video…
TL;DR: IF YOU DRIVE AT ALL, GET A DASHCAM!!!
thread sucks
post more info or delete the whole fucking thing -
2015-10-31 at 10:28 PM UTC in kind of worried I may have got another girl pregnantgodamn it
this is why i never post on this site. every time i try to make a post after signing in and type more than twelve characters it automatically logs me out
i had a reasonable response typed in to this thread of more than two sentences...it logged me out...then when i logged back it everything i typed was gone
fuck this place
-
2015-10-31 at 10:22 PM UTC in If you drive, I strongly recommend getting a dash cam...
…Or just record your drive somehow, i.e. put a couple rubber bands on your visor and fasten you're phone and have it recording video while you're driving:
I'm not gonna go into to much detail but about a week ago[redacted I SO WISHED that I had that shit on video…
TL;DR: IF YOU DRIVE AT ALL, GET A DASHCAM!!!
thread sucks
post more info or delete the whole fucking thing -
2015-10-31 at 10:21 PM UTC in why are so many women bisexual?
Its because heterosexual women have a disgusting sexual response. They are attracted to male genitalia, which is something that I will just never understand. You have to be a disgusting perverted whore to want to interact sexually with dicks. They actually seek out these disgusting engorged genitals that, at best, resemble some sort of parasitic tubeworm. Women are just fucked in the head. It sort of wierds me out, thinking that women are so degenerate and base that they actually desire erect penises. Lesbians are just more normal women, with the same sensible mindset as men, who are attracted to the much more appropriate and aesthetic female genitalia.
no, its a hormonal response. same as with males. no normal male would want to stick any part of themselves into any part of another organism if it werent for the programming that are hormones
