User Controls
Posts by Malice
-
2017-07-24 at 7:28 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS*large conference*
"Professor Malice, where did the origins of your philosophical treatise first begin to arise?"
"It was on a now defunct website titled Niggas In Space."
"I'm sorry, could you repeat that?" -
2017-07-24 at 7:25 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
Originally posted by aldra don't listen she's trying to seduce you
The interpersonal dynamics that would arise from positioning myself betwixt Hydro and PoC as lovers is so utterly horrifyingly that my mind retracts and refuses to delve further.
The unimaginable complexity of standard human relationships within a typical human life and the potential for the severe psychological distress and other forms of harm they cause genuinely terrifies me to the point that I don't believe I will ever desire to be the kind of person who enmeshes himself within this environment-dynamic and have more than a very limited number of personal relations I truly value.
Humans are monsters, and I see even myself as a deviation so monstrous and abnormal, to the extent that I do not fully understand myself despite the inordinate amount of time I've spent in self-reflection throughout my life.
I am what those apex predators who exist in the dark would fear as their unknown force who exists in a greater kind of darkness. The quality runs so deep that it threatens to overcome and turn against even myself. If you do not truly understand what danger you wield you will never know what exactly it is you risk. -
2017-07-24 at 3:15 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDSMQ should really make a series of videos highlighting Chootie's best moments.
-
2017-07-24 at 2:08 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS^ sploo
-
2017-07-23 at 9:50 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDSThe nice thing about spending all your waking hours in a small inflatable pool surrounded by alcohol containers is that you could just lazily pour it over your mouth without worrying about spills or mess, even use the sanitizing effect as an alternative to showering. Then if you ever became desperate enough you could just drink the pool water, which would re-hydrate you as well.
-
2017-07-23 at 9:46 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...
-
2017-07-23 at 9:46 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...
-
2017-07-23 at 9:45 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...
Originally posted by ZツK i never said i was normal. no one on this site is normal. but you and Bill Krozby (in very different ways) are the only users that seem to have a completely distorted, irredeemable, simplistically retarded view on reality that is creates imminent and continuous cringe and a bane on every individual in any proximity of you two online or irl
-
2017-07-23 at 9:42 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...Ree to the left
Ree to the right
Everyone's reeing out of control
Ree to the left
Ree to the right
Everyone's reeing out of control -
2017-07-23 at 9:41 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS"It is good to be a cynic—it is better to be a contented cat — and it is best not to exist at all. Universal suicide is the most logical thing in the world—we reject it only because of our primitive cowardice and childish fear of the dark. If we were sensible we would seek death—the same blissful blank which we enjoyed before we existed."
Lovecraft was severely depressed for most of his life. Suicide is a wonderful thing. No matter how bad things become, at least you can always return to the eternal peace and safety of non-existence.
Ultimately I think universal suicide may essentially be how the end of life occurs. -
2017-07-23 at 9:34 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...
Originally posted by ZツK you told everyone to take a personality test. if they scored themselves high enough it meant to you that THEY MUST HAVE AUTISM THERE IS IRREFUTABLE PROOF FROM THIS MULTIPLE CHOICE TEST THEIR WHOLE LIFE WAS A LIE THIS EXPLAINS EVERYTHING
youre way too socially retarded to diagnose anyone with anything. you'd be the worst psychologist in the world because all of your analyses are just mentally retarded self referential thinking. you're the only user here who actually comes off as disabled enough to be some weird form of downs syndrome, so yes, you're the only person here anyone would really consider a total autard dumbass/loser/should commit suicide/etc
Sploo, I have something to reveal to you. I'm not who you think I am. I've been living a lie.
This entire time you've actually been speaking to
-
2017-07-23 at 9:32 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...
Originally posted by ZツK autism = mental retardation
just replace the word "autism" with "mental retardation" every time you go on one of these rants
(you're literally retarded)
Oh ho, you made the mistake of reminding of my planned thread on autism and intelligence, replete with an array of undeniable studies.
Just you wait, sploo, you will never be able to make this claim again.
That aside, it would be better to be even a low functioning autistic than to be you, whatever it is you are, the vast array of deficits you possess.
"Nu uh, my psychiatrist only diagnosed me with OCD, depression, and polysubstance abuse! I'm always high! Shut up, how would you know!?"
Oh, riiiight, your entire life has just been one big drug induced laugh. There are no underlying deficits at all and once you finally get clean and begin flying straight you'll immediately become a success. The only reason it hasn't occurred at any point to date is because you simply don't want to. Doing low quality drugs all day and traumatizing people is simply your goal in life.
Why, I was completely wrong after all. A person such as yourself if leaps better for the world around him, even for himself, than any form of autism possibly could be. You're practically nature's greatest miracle.
Can you imagine if sploo died and the only thing he wanted, that he had, was to have his 150+ IQ score from a test he took online engraved on his tombstone? -
2017-07-23 at 9:24 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...
Originally posted by ZツK youre the only person with autism on this forum
No I'm not, I've literally identified or led to the diagnosis of multiple other people on this message board and have demonstrated that my prediction that it would be massively overrepresented (Rate of diagnosis in the US is under 1 in 1000) was absolutely right. I've even shown, which I also predicted, that literally every single remaining female on this board may have Asperger's.
It has such a profound effect on your life, the value of what can stem from being aware of possessing this condition, along with the data I mentioned above, everything has such profound cumulative value that it has been well worth, many times over, my obsessive research and ranting over ASD/Asperger's/autism.
If you don't agree with this you are not a man of science, learning, and do not genuinely care about either of the two aforementioned categories. I insist that you tear up any degrees you may have, never use them for your benefit again, or even utilize anything that was produced via science and knowledge in general. You do not deserve it. In fact, in your own personal life you should not even use the scientific method in any form or even think. I am genuinely requesting that you stop thinking ever again and go live in the wilderness like the savage you are, you don't deserve it. -
2017-07-23 at 9:18 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...And if you're referring to autism as a mental illness, it is not, it's a neurological disorder/deviation.
To a degree, lower levels of education, employment among african americans owe in part to being historically economically disadvantaged starting with slavery. But we need not even claim this, as uncontroversial as it should be, we need look only at the economic situation of the south in the ~30 years following the civil war to see how dependant the economy was upon the institution of slavery.
No shit, what's your point? You can't simply assume that because the south experienced a drastic detrimental impact after the war and slavery was disbanded that the current state of the south is because of this.
"Oh, alright, now we're back to you crying misunderstood authorial intent in your rambling discursive screeds aimed at no one in particular on nothing in particular except perhaps how everyone is wrong about everything ever. Good trick."
Hahaha, this is what I imagine you would have been like towards people you disliked or in debates in middle school had you attended a school for the gifted, except you never fully grew out of it.
"I think "half the country goes into economic depression if thing goes away" is a good argument for a thing being economically "pivotal", do you disagree?"
Okay, I'll admit I wasn't clear and misspoke. Yes, of course at the time it was a substantial part of the economy, economic frictions are a standard part of economic theory, no one would argue that afterward they weren't bound to experience this. All I'm saying is:
1.) Slavery was not necessary for the US's economic development, its development to the point of global dominance.
2.) It was not a net benefit and an alternate timeline where it had never existed would have led to superior outcomes.
What exactly are you arguing? Slavery was a non-negligible component of the US economy, therefore it's non-negligible? This is tautological. If you're stating that the US would have experienced a current net modern loss stemming directly from the effects of an absence of slavery (Certainly things would be different, what's arguable is whether they would be worse, even simply for whites.), this is utter nonsense. Once again, you're a leftist and don't even understand economics, I don't know why you would even attempt to argue this.
I have it, this is "verbal autism". Yes, I may actually be onto something, something that would be worth writing a paper on. Now, listen to me, the basic outline I have in mind is that the cognitive style that is utilized by those who have an unnaturally high affinity toward computer programming, that is used while actually engaged in the task, can manifest in some via a neurological abnormality that causes them to be unable to normally modulate their cognitive style when engaged in tasks outside of this. Essentially, it's akin to the monomania, the extremely limited talents, that is observed as disproportionately occurring in those on the spectrum. Your were, neurologically, practically born to be unable to excel in anything other than computer programming. The drawback is, as I was leading to via the aforementioned, that this causes you to effectively be unable to function with others in any behavior where this will lead to considerable interference, such as now. Now, I certainly have a rather extreme hyper-systemizing and unemotional cognitive style, but this is different, far more general. Even in your romantic relationships, and you're bound to be completely oblivious as to just how radically you deviate from the norm, which is standard among those suffering from ASD (To be clear, I am not stating you are, simply that you possess a highly limited and rare form that is bound to have a shared or at least similar neurological basis.), I could imagine that everything that occurs in it, your analysis, plans, and actual execution of behavior/output is essentially of the same general style as that which you would use to produce a computer code. Now, you may claim that this is so complex it wouldn't even be feasible, that you don't even possess the knowledge, but that isn't what I'm stating. This has been a part of your being your entire life, since childhood, as demonstrated by your excessive amount of time spent using electronics, including computers, at the expense of social relationships or even simply being in the terrible world you've always known as the "outside", and has continually been developed, enmeshed into every facet of your life, you have learned to utilize it in order to be able to cope with the world, to function, and it has refined itself to the point, its strength growing in line with the natural neurological and cognitive development that occurs, that it has reached the level where it can function to the point where this can be attained. Cognitive functions are naturally largely automatic, of course you wouldn't be aware of it. Now, certainly it would function with total accuracy and efficacy, such a claim would be absurd, it's simply one of many cognitive strategies that could be used, and yours is simply exceedingly rare and abnormal. You possess enough interpersonal understanding and awareness, the general cognitive ability, to know that others perceive you as being strange, to whatever extent, possibly even abnormal, whatever adjective you believe is most commonly ascribed to you, but due to deeply seated introversion, awkwardness, low self esteem, deep insecurity, and fear of a negative perception/appraisal by others IRL it's far less perceptible and you've learned to mask it to some extent.
As I stated right in the second sentence of the above, this is merely a basic outline, and it will require a great amount of research to properly expound upon. I believe I am going to title the paper on this fascinating proposed undiscovered neurological abnormality and case study on you: Ryan Jenkins, the Boy Who Became a Cognitive Computer.
There are countless aspects of negroism that leftists such as yourself identify with, particularly during the slavery era. It's absolutely no surprise that you persistently engage in this glorification and defense of the black race. It's nothing but negrophilia. The fantasies you're bound to have of being analogous to a modern day slave in our technological-industrial economic system where you sell your labor, believing yourself to be forced into such an arrangement, is so evident it doesn't even deserve expounding upon. I could write one of my elaborate analyses of the fantasy you're bound to regularly retreat to while at work of an uprising against your masters, becoming the acknowledged voluntary leader of a new revolutionary force and finally having an outlet for what you would see as a justifiable exertion of violent force, when in fact it's nothing but part of the array of severe psychological deviations, primarily the psychopathic urge to engage in murder and torture of others, which you've suppressed since your teenage years, possibly even early childhood, but I'm tired and really don't feel in the right cognitive state to do so.
Post last edited by Malice at 2017-07-23T10:03:44.947419+00:00
Post last edited by Malice at 2017-07-23T12:53:27.769667+00:00 -
2017-07-23 at 8:37 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...God you're annoying. This is why no one likes attempting to debate you. As I've said before, there's just something about you that's reminiscent of, yet far far worse, than autism.
-
2017-07-23 at 7:51 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
Originally posted by Piles of Crack I feel like smashing my fucking head in with a brick
I often feel like I want to drive a power drill straight into my brain and let all the pain and disease out.
I've mentioned the concept of thanatos before and how it relates to my life, why my actions have been so consistently self-destructive for so long. I think I may have a perpetual urge to die, to return to non-existence, that never fully goes away, even during manic moods and happy moments.
I think I'm the kind of person that could commit suicide even at their happiest moment, having been genuinely happy for years, over a decade.
Post last edited by Malice at 2017-07-23T08:11:46.878277+00:00 -
2017-07-23 at 6:46 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...
Originally posted by Lanny This is such a bad argument lol
Leftist.cognitive.biases.
Originally posted by Lanny The enduring poverty of the south in the post-civil-war era is a testament to the country's dependence on slave labor for economic success.
Just to be clear, are stating that the current poverty in the south due to this? Because if so, you are the one that is postulating utterly moronic and parochial arguments. There are a vast array of other factors, mainly assortative social dynamics, brain drain, levels of urbanization, and the very high percentage of the population that is black: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Belt_(U.S._region)
Along with the profound and numerous detrimental effects this has on society, creating a low trust society that skews towards crude Republican statism: http://archive.boston.com/news/globe/ideas/articles/2007/08/05/the_downside_of_diversity/Oh, so we're backpedaling now. Alright, salvage your pride and scurry along now.
Oh, alright, now we're back to your idiosyncratic habit of misinterpreting, presuming, and fixating over semantics. What exactly does it mean for the US economy to have been "founded" on slavery? At what point in time? How much does it need to have contributed to be considered a foundational factor? By the same definition could that, let's say, the industry of creating wooden tops was a foundational factor?
*spits on floor* Vile leftist hypocrite. Your kind never changes. That's hyperbolic, so hopefully one day you'll grow up and return to your roots, the true predisposition you attempt to suppress. You were not drawn to the financial sector, which you have literally referred to as Satan, by chance. Mark my works, my boy.
I am blatantly stating it: If the US had had no slavery at all the nation would have fared far better. Slaves do not deserve an iota of attention with regard to the analysis of US economic supremacy. -
2017-07-23 at 12:26 AM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...The southern economy was destroyed and had to be rebuilt after the civil war. As I stated, slavery and blacks had no considerable lasting impact. We would have been far better off if this foolishness had never occurred, particularly as we would not be currently plagued by the descendents of those slaves, the modern vile negro and the white man's burden.
Edit: Narc is absolutely correct in his analysis, slavery is simply economically inefficient. -
2017-07-22 at 10:45 PM UTC in UPDATED AND REVISED: List of people who will never have children:Is this supposed to be a bad thing?
Look up the research on parenting and happiness? It's even worse than it seems when you go into deeper analyses. The costs, and I don't purely refer to monetary, are enormous.
It's simply an absolutely nightmare. It produces some of the strongest biological effects, emotional and cognitive biases, that skew the perceptions of parents to an immense extent in order to have them optimally care for the progeny at the expense of themselves. One of the goals that should be among the highest importance to the man of learning is questioning and understand what underlies their motivations and behaviors, all aspects of their humanities. Why do I do as such, why do I behave this way, react, feel, desire? A true understanding of the gene centric view of evolution is that we will be driven to behaviors that are not beneficial for ourselves, nor even for others, behaviors that when analyzed under a system of ethics will reveal themselves to instead be, arguably, the most abhorrent there are in human existence.
"There is only one inborn error, and that is the notion that we exist in order to be happy... So long as we persist in this inborn error... the world seems to us full of contradictions. For at every step, in things great and small, we are bound to experience that the world and life are certainly not arranged for the purpose of maintaining a happy existence"
We do not exist to be happy. We can strive to be happy, attain it, but this is not what our beings evolved to do, to provide us with a satisfactory experience that leads us to some optimal notion of happiness and fulfillment. Not only will our individual lives be affected by the overlooking, lack of, and misunderstanding of this concept, but of course as our species exists as the most collaborative and advanced on earth, by far, it will be ever present and ubiquituou among cultures, societies, and all aspects of such. Look around you, reflect on the past, on what was imposed on you, the institutions you were made to attend, coerced to, and think of the countless imperfections you became aware of, the countless grievances.
Does any of this appear to be a world that was specifically designed, designed by man himself, every one of us to some extent, to come anywhere near to optimizing our happiness, minimizing suffering, and providing us with a sense of fulfillment?
We must be the most foolish species of all at the end. -
2017-07-22 at 10:32 PM UTC in Yeah, and I don't like talkin' to strangers...
Originally posted by Captain Falcon And also slavery absolutely di build the US. It wasn't the only thing, but it was a pretty big part of it.
A bunch of niggers picking cotton by hand, who still needed to be housed, fed, and overlooked, did not build the United States. To claim that something so insubstantial was a pivotal factor in what led to the development of the nation to the status of the most powerful and economically advanced on earth is incredibly simplistic and an absolute insult to the factors and people, almost entirely white men, that were the genuine drivers behind this.
Tesla, not Sambo! *pounds fist on desk*