User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by Zanick
-
2018-06-30 at 6:26 AM UTC in Donald Trump apprecation thread
Originally posted by joerell Have you ever been to the ME…if you were you wouldn't ask this. Iran basically controls the whole region in one way or another and is the main terrorist state. If they force moderates to leave a large percentage will also be operatives and with open borders in Europe including idiots like Merkle running the EU it's 100% certain Europe will be destroyed further. Globalists control the EU and even manipulate currencies.
Have you?
Can you name a single terrorist attack Iran was responsible for in the last 20 years? You're just repeating stupid slogans like 'Iran wants to destroy America!!' without understanding anything about the matter.
The truth is, virtually all terrorism today is committed by Sunni groups (spefically the extreme Wahabbi-Salafist sects), directly armed by the Gulf states (mostly Saudi Arabia) and financed by the US and Israel. Sunnis and Shiites are opposing Islamic ideologies. Israel and the US fund these terrorists in order to cause infighting among Muslims in an attempt to break the united front against Israel's dreams of owning the region.
Israel has no legitimacy, siphons billions (likely trillions) of US public funds that could otherwise be used to repair your decaying infrastructure and supports the 'terrorists' you're so afraid of. The reason it enjoys such deep US support is because people in powerful places are ideologically bound to support it, and everyday peons like yourself buy into the all-pervasive 'greatest ally' propaganda.These were past presidents…not Trump.
lol. This is exactly why I brought up Syria in the first place. He's continuing to support terrorist groups, even if the policy wasn't initially his choice.
True, he's shut down many of the DoD programs delivering support to rebel groups, but this was likely just to reduce the conflicts between DoD and CIA supported terrorists - nothing has been done to reign in the CIA's operations.The US saved Europe in WW2 from extreme socialism and you idiots still haven't learned your lesson.
The US only entered the war after the outcome had been decided - it didn't save anyone from anything. The war was decided at Kursk and Stalingrad, and the US only entered when it was safe to claim victory without taking significant losses. -
2018-06-29 at 7:59 PM UTC in Bad day in Nigeriahi this is ACP's grandma , who wants cookies?!
my grandson who is ACP used to love this song!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-29 at 3:43 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
-
2018-06-29 at 5:31 AM UTC in ATTENTION LANNY
Originally posted by -SpectraL I was a moderator on Totse.
I was a moderator on Zoklet.
I was a moderator on tRP.
I was a moderator of TheDamagedOne.
I was a moderator of Avoyel.
You two think you know more about the BBS scene than I do.
Lol, did you really just supply us with you internet forum moderation resume?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-28 at 6:59 PM UTC in Lateralso the sheer volume of anime avatars on a pro-suicide site is amusingThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-27 at 7:30 PM UTC in Finny's username fucks up the layout on my phoneFINNEY IS MESSING UP MY OBAMA FONE WHY DIDNT TRUMP MAKE A UPGRADED VERSION
BIGLY FONE 2019!!!! CHANGE I CAN BELIEVE ONThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-27 at 5:29 PM UTC in Finny's username fucks up the layout on my phone
Originally posted by infinityshock banged lannys mom nine months before he was born. whos your daddy, bitch this is how fucktarded you are
now, by making this thread, every alt anyone makes is going to have a 255-character length for no other reason than to piss on your screen.
Not everyone has to compensate for a completely failed life by being a little pest on the internet you fucking disgrace.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-26 at 9 PM UTC in Apparent uptick in demonic possessionskind of want to read this but not clicking a naturalnews linkThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-25 at 11:40 AM UTC in GIVE ME PICS
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-21 at 5:39 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Obbe More and more research shows that plants are intelligent, can sense touch, react when they are damaged, etc… If sometime in the future it is revealed to you that all forms of life can experience well being and suffering, will you still eat food?
Originally posted by Captain I believe Lanny is avoiding the uncomfortable question here.
I'm not. People who argue plants have hedonic faculties generally state in the general form of "plants can react to stimulus, so they must be able to feel pain!" which I think is a really flimsy argument. In general I think this is a camp that takes some real and interesting findings in biology and draws wholly invalid conclusions from them. But Obbe did put it in the most interesting way the question can be framed, as a hypothetical.
So if we found that all life is capable of well being or suffering, which I've put forward as the criterion for moral considerability, then we need to ask what the distribution and degree of considerability is among species. If plants have a very slight hedonic faculty but humans a much greater one, then it may be justifiable to inflict the amount of suffering required for our well being on plants. For what it's worth I think this argument applies to animals too: the lives of humans are certainly more considerable than those of chickens and I would never say that a starving person is doing something wrong for eating a chicken, it's simply that when we have a choice between eating an animal, which is somewhat less morally considerable than us, and a plant, which I think is totally morally unconsiderable, then we do something wrong by harming the animal.
So what if plants end being capable the same or greater depth of feeling than animals? I think the situation is really pretty far fetched, but if it was the case then I guess most of us would be obligated to die since I doubt we could sustain a very large population on fruit or whatever other sources of calories are available to us without killing anything.
Originally posted by -SpectraL Agreed.
Lol, you're the one dodging my questions buddyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-16 at 7:38 AM UTC in A proclimation of my love for dear fralalaDear Frala,
We have only been together a few weeks, but already I know we were meant to be. I can see it in the way you look at me, those sparkling brown eyes of yours. The tiny pimples on your face, glowing like lunar craters. You are the embodiment of human sexuality, the pinnacle of womanhood. When I look out into the world, I see not women, but girls. Girls who try, but never succeed. Not like you do. You, Frala, are special.
You may not know we have been dating, and that is fine. I'll admit that I have been wondering when you would respond to the countless letters I have been sending, but it doesn't matter. If you aren't ready, you aren't ready. I know one day you will be, and I want you to know that I'll be patiently waiting.
I've already applied for a lease just a flew blocks down from your apartment. It wasn't easy packing my life and things on such short notice. My girlfriend threw a fit over it, but she is but an ant to us giants of love. Insignificant and squishable.
I look forward to the next time we can share proximity.
Love,
Ensign §m£ÂgØL.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-06-14 at 6:19 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meatThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-14 at 2:40 PM UTC in I love cunnilingus...You guys should stfu and eat more pussy and that would definitely solve the problem.
-
2018-06-13 at 6:30 PM UTC in Im in luv with lala NISFuck wrong accountThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-10 at 9:24 AM UTC in Why is the United States in constant military conflicts?because the US hasn't had to deal with an actual war that threatened their home soil since the civil war, so your average person's understanding of what war actually is is limited, to say the leastThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-06-07 at 7:12 PM UTC in TSTM erases the person from your inbox
-
2018-06-07 at 5:54 PM UTC in We have a moral obligation to stop eating meat
Originally posted by Captain I was going to write a longer response to Lanny but I'm going to make things a lot simpler:
Sure, let's call it potential to participate in the social contract
OK, so let's suppose Joe Psychopath happens upon a healthy looking child who's like, IDK, 4 or 5 or something. An age before they can appreciate the idea of a social contract. Joe tortures the child inflicting a lot of pain a maiming them for life. Joe goes on his way thinking he's done a good job of ruining or significantly degrading the child's life.
But there's a twist: unbeknownst to anyone, the child has a rare heart condition that's going to cause him to die in a few months or years. The universe is, per your assumption, deterministic meaning the child will die inevitably. The child's person also never extends forwards far enough to participate in a social contract and thus never had potential to do so.
In such a case, under your model, we seem committed to say Joe Psychopath did nothing wrong as the temporally extended child is not morally considerable. Now of course we can't say he was justified in torturing the child as he had no way to know that the child was not morally considerable, but we would seem to have to say he serendipitously avoided doing wrong by harming a morally irrelevant being. -
2018-06-06 at 5:50 AM UTC in Edward Snowden
-
2018-05-28 at 8 AM UTC in Can we have a "preview" option next to "submit"?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-05-23 at 3:03 PM UTC in Posts per day graph
Originally posted by Codebeta during a time the Democrates are trying to burn the Constitution. With a few tweaks and changes more patriots would come and it is actually good site. Wondering about the members list…El is good at figuring out the troll pattern from our former site.
>a tradition of gerrymandering older than constitution itself
>half a century of bi-partisan expansion of federal power
>twenty years of bi-partisan expansion of the surveillance state
>laundry list of wars unilaterally initiated by the executive branch, being a favored, if not exclusive, trick of republicans
>those fucking democrats, tryna take my guns when I'm not part of a militia. How are we gonna have a revolution now?
