Originally posted by Technologist
He seems pretty upset.
I mean, what did he expect? Everyone to want to stick around when he goes around using admin to fuck with stuff? At least scron did his trolling legitly.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
If it makes you feel any better I only used it against Fonaplats
He came online yesterday right as I was pouring lava everywhere. He came online as the lava was still flowing and I quickly picked it up and said I was there all morning fixing it
And then he thanked me and gave me admin lololol
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by CandyRein
I don’t know …you were kinda joining in with them and you thanked the Op.. I look nothing like that why would you thank his trolling of me ..I’ve done nothing to him lmao
I thanked it for the drawing not because it was making fun of you.
That's where you always get it wrong. I literally didnt thank it for a while so that you wouldn't see the thank because I knew youd assume it meant I agreed in making fun of you. For the record that means that you have been going back and checking if it was thanked. I'm the only one. It's ok.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
*** will continue to write, posting incrementally in case I forget to save ***
I don't really think there's much difference anymore in the 'west' at least.
In regards to Google specifically, it's both directly and indirectly financed by multiple parts of the US government with code and data being shared with state intelligence agencies through mutually-linked groups like betabet.
There seems to be a concerted campaign to demonise direct state surveillance and propaganda; often simply stating that 'state institutions' are bad and 'private institutions' are good, a good example being Twitter's recent ban of advertising from selected companies that are partially state-funded. I'm aware that this is a component of the old capitalism vs. communism circlejerk dating back at least as far as the cold war, but the new component is that in many cases the state and 'private enterprises' act as one unit with two faces.
'Private Enterprises', specifically news and 'Big Tech' companies are afforded funding and competitive advantage in exchange for participating in state-backed initiatives ranging from aiding foreign policy to changing domestic opinions. Perhaps this is the wrong way to look at it though - in much of the 'Capitalist' west, finance is the source of both economic and political power so instead of thinking of the private sector as being partially subservient to state goals, it's more accurate to think of both the private sector and the state as being partially subservient to entrenched sources of 'wealth'.
My concern in making this thread is more about practical application though; it matters little whether the person who is surveilling you chooses to identify as a state or private actor. What I find to be interesting is the way in which such groups exploit existing law and social perception by using private companies to collect surveillance data, only to be directly connected to the state apparatus that processes and acts on it.
In much of the world where capitalism is viewed overall favourably, there is the perception that private sector spying and surveillance is largely harmless. Their goals, it is believed, are purely economic and their hoarding of personal information is only a matter of improving the company's economic success. There's no reason to believe a company would, for example, keep a database of political dissidents because it does nothing to improve their 'bottom line'. The unasked question then becomes, "but what if someone would want to buy such a database?".
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Fonaplats
victim of incest
[daylong jump-start that nome]
Originally posted by Obbe
Are you going to rent a 24/7 server and add /home and /spawn and set "fire spread" to "false"?
Imma get a butter server but I'm not turning the fire off. If you guys can't get along and not burn each others houses down then that's on you. I made my house out of rock. You put the lava filled warp drive in retard tower.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
I've been playing Minecraft since the very start before there were even trees in the game.
It was lots of fun though to make tunnels through the terrain. There was no darkness mechanic so when you go underground with no light it only got a bit darker not totally black
And there were no resources at all except dirt, sand, flowers, rock. We knew it had lots of potential though and now the game has so much shit I don't even know how half of it works.
It's one of my favorite games I used to have a server in the very early pre survival days and I also had a survival server in 2012 with 100 people for a year
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The Middle Path is useful for dilemmas like these... It tends to work out more better than either the left path or the right path.
Thus is why there are high taxes on tobacco. If you are going to something risky, you are going to pay bigly for it, which is also why many people will be persuaded not to do so and why those who do will do so less.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Obbe
I don't know. I guess the difference is with smoking you are knowingly harming yourself. Your examples are more along the lines of accidents. It seems natural to want to help someone who has been hurt, but that desire seems to diminish considerably when the person was knowingly hurting themselves.
We could consider that many smokers never in fact have medical issues related to it, just the same as most car owners or soccer practice kids never have a medical issue related to it. We could say that smoking and driving are the same risks and if you have a medical problem with either one, it's an accident.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by park police
Whether or not they last a long time is irrelevant, the point is the voltage multiplier being quite simple to construct.
There's only about a billion ways to do anything. I've done a lot of things that I talked about for years before doing them, and people assumed I'd never get around to doing them. Eventually I did. Stuff that can make people's lives so much easier, but most people just lack the drive to do anything other than mindless automation work.
You don't need calipers or a multi meter to do any of this, but they are pretty useful. Shake lights are cool.
Now, they do make these ones which have a flywheel in them, so you pull the trigger, and the wheel spins. This a lot more efficient than turning a crank or shaking the light. You can use the same concept to make a small charger for various different things.
this is so retarded i had to stop readimg because i was literally chocking on my own laughter i couldnt breathe. this
this is more than just retard tier this is brain dead invalid tier.
tell me how much electricity (in watt) that are required to keep the thing on for an hour (60 minutes) and how much human callories (in kilo callories) that are required to produce this much wattage with your improvised, hand cranked, flywheel regulated, brain dead generator.
how. much.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by park police
Because that won't kill them you faggot, a bug zapper removes them from the equation permanently. A net is just gay and fragile like you. No wonder you came up with that.
There are literally millions of insects in the wood son. Mosquito nets are durable and you can get treated nets.that kill mosquitoes who hit them anyway. Just take a load and put em up to create a protected area, they are like $5 for one.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
