We should breed coloured sheep and put gay little rainbows everywhere
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Rear Naked Joke
When did I say "not the humans"? Humans have been designed, by natural selection. To survive and bear offspring. But that's just the backbone for all sorts of exploration into design space because you have to exist to do anything like that.
so our purpose is to merely survive and reproduce ?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Rear Naked Joke
How do you think humans work? This I why I fucking hate you man. It took us all these posts to say that there is design in nature because you are just an idiot and go around in semantic circles.
You hate Obbe? :(
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Obbe
I'm just trying to understand what he is saying.
I think you both are.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Obbe
You do good drawings, will you draw me defeating a creeper in minecraft?
Yes :D
Originally posted by Japan-Is-Eternal
he drew that?
you have some semblance of talent but the artistry is very boring
try harder next time
Ur rite i should draw anime instead
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Rear Naked Joke
So yes the purpose of the eye is to see, even if nobody gave it that purpose. It's a natural part of our universe but I don't know why that should deflate it?
so you mean eyes, which purposes is to see, was designed, but not the humans they belongs to because we dont know the purpose of humans.
or apendixes for that matter, since they serve no functions, or no longer do.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Rear Naked Joke
Design is when something is fashioned for a specific purpose. That specific purpose doesn't need to be the result of a conscious human choice for something to fit the criteria of design. Meanings and purposes evolve.
but how can there be purposes without humans and their mind and consciousness ?
what is the purposes of our sun fusing hydrogens into heliums before we exist ?
no human. no reason, no purpose.
no design.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Hence why discussing disjointed philosophy is fucking stupid 99% of the time.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-09-11 at 10:56 PM UTC
in
This isn't real...
-SpectraL
coward
[the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
All the world's indeed a stage, and we are merely players, performers and portrayers, each another's audience inside the gilded cage.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Obbe
I have no idea. This thread was just for fun. I don't care anymore. Tell me what you think, and I will say "okay".
Lol
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2019-09-10 at 11:25 AM UTC
in
Do rainbows exist objectively?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Rear Naked Joke
You're getting closer but still off.
Our ability to see IS colours. How can you see without representing objects extended in space? How can you "visually" represent objects extended in space? Whatever that is, it's colours. The very fact that you are able to differentiate one thing from another visually, is colours.
You don't get the ability to see colours and it doesn't need to be a similar, vision is colours.
Well when I asked the "if a tree falls in the forest" thing was in my mind. If everyone in the whole world was completely blind, from day 1, THEN would color still exist?
Or like the minecraft example. Did minecraft always exist even before it was ever invented ? The POTENTIAL of it did, so in essence EVERYTHING exists, but it.. ya know.. doesnt exist either until someone can acknowledge it as a thing.
It's fine make fun of me I'm bad at this.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Rear Naked Joke
What makes you think there's a difference?
I understand. If it's just a simulation of our eye comes and rods I guess there is no such thing as REAL color, so the answer to my question would be the ability to see color since it had to have come first or else color wouldn't even exist.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
I have made an environmental trial with sick gear at the end. See: water tower.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
I'm going to turn up the difficulty pretty soon. Right now it's at Normal.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
