2004, I signed up as a horny 13 year old. It was either asking how to break into a girl's locker at school, or how to spy on girl's getting changed.
2016-04-24 at 6:37 AM UTC
in
Games We've Completed
Semiazas is NOT a year clean. I've talked to him on the phone while he was telling me about hownhe relapsed. That was back in I think August? He got mad at me for telling you guys last time and broke up with me. It's the truth though. Love ya semi but don't lie.
2016-04-24 at 6:34 AM UTC
in
Minecraft 1.9
Can you join without a legit copy? I wanna play
Beware of the fucking corn snakes they stalk please help they're all over
Your naturalism is amusing. As much as they cannot differentiate between that which is for nourishment and that which is waste they refuse to take any argument that Man is superior to all other beings. God gave us this earth, friend. He gave us every gott dayum thang on it, the dirt, the sea, the grass and their beasts. And he gave all that to us as much as he gave us to that. You may think I am trolling but there is everything to support this theory. Discounting silly arguments of our reality state (OH but ur in a sImUlAtIoN maid bi alienz! or other more well counstructed yet fundamentally flawed arguments) there is nothing to prove that we are not the apex predator. In our time here we have molded the land to our liking. We have taken what we needed and paid the prices nessecary for survival. Among all that we are where we are and there is no reasonable evidence our place is threatened.
Now I will tell you why you subverted any real argument against my points but rather tell me what arguments I need to defeat for my argument to work. This is something I have seen you do and it is a particularly hooked nosed deceit you are pulling. In terms of biological imperative my argument holds. But lefties such as yourself cannot handle biology and must resort to intellectual masturbation to make a point. It is no doubt that you have proceeded upon or at least have attempted to proceed upon the aforementioned biological imperative (perhaps not even realizing it a means of production). Are you to tell me this natural drive is unnatural and that its unnatural deviations are genuine, or at least moreso than the natural drive? Perhaps I have convoluted myself. To speak more precisely, totalitarianism is not an aspect of copulation. Capitalism cannot sell babies and Fascism cannot force them anymore than the Communists can prevent them. It is universally preferable to engage in heteronormative behavior for one simple undeniable fact. It holds true beyond ideology, philosophy or what have you. In any society ever the majority has always been of a heteronormative persuasion. In any declining society approval (or at least tolerance) of homosexual behavior emerges. This is the ebb and flow of nations and civilization.
Now address my argument as it is rather than resorting to some fallacy about totalitarianism and elevated preference.
[greentext]>implying lanny is not 9001% correct[/greentext]
Totse was the original muslamic-judean shill thread.
It is not. I would genuinely be interested in hearing your response.
[greentext]>implying they dont[/greentext]
top kek m8. muslamic propaganda is real.
They would encourage school shooters. Think about it.
I have hear a lot of talk on this forum about what yall dub UPB or "Universally Preferable Behavior". I, not being an ethicist, will note that I have not read up on universally preferable behavior but will note that it seems quite reasonable to define it as behavior that universally preferable to some other behavior.
Now let me begin by saying that I will define universally preferable behavior as above. We can then assume that there are behaviors that are beneficial and behaviors that are less so. In terms of what is most important (the continuity of our race and species) there is nothing more derogatory to that end than a homosexual life style. Sure you may make the argument that with test tube babies and science the idea of human copulation to produce offspring will become unnecessary but this is a ludicrous claim. To think that the natural will be overtaken by the synthetic is nonsense since the human drive is inherently towards the natural and it is an undeniable psychological fact (at least in the days of sane psychology) that one who is averse to this drive is indeed mentally ill (at least in the sense that their preference does not align with the majority nor does it serve a useful function socially).
So to round this out we can without a doubt say that heteronormative individuals are indeed preforming a behavior that is beneficial to the race as a whole by getting together, having a nice fuck and making a new human. The subsequent care for that new human is assumed to be through the couple who preformed the act but is necessarily unimportant for this argument because what truly matters (in terms of our argument here) is that a new human is created rather than reared. Homosexuality on the other hand is universally unpreferable in this regard as there is no reality in which a homosexual couple can, together without the assistance of a multitude of doctors, social workers, sperm donors or surrogate mothers, have a natural child. We can see that even from a Marxist (fucking gross!) standpoint that heterosexuality is far more advantageous than homosexuality simply by comparing the amount of labor involved in each process.
Q.E.D.
.