User Controls
Posts by Number13
-
2017-12-30 at 8:15 PM UTC in Where do you see gaming in 10 - 20 years?Well you can pound hatsune miku's tight little asshole in VR already so I can't see it getting much better
-
2017-12-26 at 11:34 PM UTC in You can pick any woman from history, and fuck them at their primeJeanne d'Arc
-
2017-12-26 at 11:14 PM UTC in Thanks for all the birthday wishesWhat's your opinion on the jedis killing you?
-
2017-12-24 at 9:39 PM UTC in Anybody here like farming/village type games? (Harvest Moon, Animal Crossing, Stardew Valley, etc)I played a few hours of a gba rom harvest moon, spent it all picking weeds then looking up cheats so I could bone everyone, don't think it worked.
Kinda in the same streak but I've played a lot of Terraria recently, any y'all play? -
2017-12-16 at 8:20 PM UTC in hate speech
-
2017-12-15 at 10:35 AM UTC in We've come a long way ...Way back I read a doujin that had animated pages, wicked shit, you should try searching for studio fow
-
2017-12-14 at 10:38 AM UTC in No State Solution - jedirusalem Predictions and DiscussionWell hopefully israel is struck down by the combined mud forces and in their post war weakened state we call a new crusade and destroy them.
-
2017-12-08 at 1:42 PM UTC in the jedis are americas best allie
-
2017-12-07 at 4:58 PM UTC in Is there anything that we can all agree on?American beer is shit beer
-
2017-12-07 at 10:43 AM UTC in the jedis are americas best allieKikes killed jesus
-
2017-12-06 at 12:34 PM UTC in Hey Fuckers
-
2017-12-03 at 12:21 PM UTC in what's your iq?Probably pretty low
-
2017-11-29 at 11:33 AM UTC in Which is the best games to play in PC?Deus ex nyigguh
-
2017-11-26 at 2:06 PM UTC in I keep getting sweaty in bed.I like being overly sweaty in bed, means I'm good and warm
-
2017-11-22 at 12:05 PM UTC in This Is What You Get With Diversity.Looks like others have replied in my place so you could probably skip my retort but just my 2 cents
Originally posted by NARCassist you see there is a few factors involved that you haven't taken into consideration and which blows some seriously big holes in your, finny's and vaders so called statistics. that part where you talk about 13% of population committing 30% of the crime, vader saying 6 out of ten blacks are criminals etc. well the biggest factor that completely messes up your racist claims is known as 'multiple charges'. multiple charges refers to a defendant being charged with more than one crime or multiple counts of the same crime and is an extremely common occurrence. in any court on any day there will be many defendants charged with multiple charges. in fact its not unknown for defendants to be charged with 5 or 10 or even more charges in one go. this fact alone would at least halve the number of people committing all those crimes in your statistics, probably more.
Personally I disagree with the 6 out of 10 blacks thing so it doesn't factor in my argument.
If you had taken even a moment to look at the link you'd see that this has been accounted for by having different numbers for different crimes as well as listing single arrests, you get arrested once and charged for multiple crimes, it may not account for
Originally posted by NARCassist then you have to factor in repeat offenders, offenders who after being convicted of an offense, or multiple offences, then go on to commit further offences.
But it does account for who is committing those crimes, I find it doubtful though that the evil racist police would arrest someone for murder and then release them to murder again, this statistic is for 2013 alone so it doesn't account for their 10 year stay in a penitentiary.
However I'll incorporate that and say that in fact this would be bolstering my argument because even if they are multiple offenders it means that this smaller number of blacks are still committing 30%-50% of violent crimes, this would also mean that a smaller portion of the white offenders were committing 50%-70% of crime but once again this should be expected from 70% of the population.
I'll admit they don't factor unsolved crimes -
2017-11-22 at 12:03 AM UTC in This Is What You Get With Diversity.Also I give in, you're right, I reject my old ways, niggerism here I come.
-
2017-11-22 at 12:02 AM UTC in This Is What You Get With Diversity.
Originally posted by greenplastic What makes you think that? That sounds like a belief you assume to be true but isn't really. Can you give me statistics or is it just based on your reasoning? Because if it's based solely on your reasoning, it's flawed.
The declining influence bit? Purely by the fact that as a country is filled with non natives it's overall ideas and ideals shift, to give a recent example look at brexit, the majority of scotland voted to remain within the eu but as scotland is a part of britain it had to be held to the majority decision even beyond it's borders.
It's the same within a single country, if a state is invaded by foreigners at some point the foreigners will be the majority and will decide for the country, it has happened, is happening and I'd prefer it didn't.
Non whites within the government of a majority white country is an attack on the influence of whites, we've seen though that whites in a non white countries government works but is neither here nor there because it's not a declining influence thing.
And I'm not sure I understand your question if it's about the economic bit because murder, assault and rape are not methods of gaining economic standing unless being payed to do so.
You could claim the first 2 as a result of robbery and such but you forget the fact that there are plenty of nonviolent but still illegal means of gaining money, as well of course as legal work.
Meaning lack of intelligence to commit the nonviolent crimes or a predisposition to violence.
Originally posted by greenplastic Also I never claimed that the crime rate would be exactly the same between races. NARC already addressed that perfectly in his reply though so I'll just say that I second that notion.
And you might not have claimed this but you said that you believe it correlates with poverty which I addressed in my post, rates of poverty even with a margin did not account for rates of crimes, not all of them.
Unless, like I said, you hold blacks and whites to different standards.
And Narcs reply didn't address anything perfectly, whites committed more crimes overall because they are 72% of the population of the US.
For some percentage statistics of crimes, once again from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43
Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter W45.3% B52.2%
Rape W66.2% B31.3%
Robbery W41.9% B56.4%
Aggravated assault W62.9% B33.9%
Burglary W67.5% B30.4%
Larceny-theft W68.3% B28.7%
and it goes on
You'll notice that the majority of the white percentages of overall crime mostly hover around 60-70% and 70% of the population committing 70% of the crime is understandable and logical, can you agree there? It's pure percentages
But 13% of the population committing 30% or more of the crime doesn't conform to that logic.
This has been my entire point and it cannot be refuted regardless of their reasons.
Originally posted by greenplastic What is it that you make thinks black people commit crimes at higher rates than whites then? If you don't believe it's correlated with economic position but solely with race, there must be some cause of it. If slavery and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of blacks, what do you think it is? Something inherent in DNA? You must have some semi-logical reason for believing that if you are doubting every other logical explanation.
Originally posted by Number13 It could be in their dna, I can't say for sure, it could be that blacks are just predisposed to violence, maybe it's their inherent ooga booga tribalism or their gibsmedat mentality.
Originally posted by greenplastic This reasoning is racist. Not even trying to be bleeding heart here, but that's just what it is. It's racist, not logical, a belief you hold that's based on the fact that you don't like black people, and not on any tangible facet of reality. If it weren't, you'd be able to express it more concisely than resorting to racist stereotypes.
I plainly said I don't know why they do it and it was in reply to your question, just your muh slavery muh poor slop doesn't sit right with me, why do I have to have a reason for them to be committing crimes? so you can say it's understandable why they do it? so you can use it as an excuse to sweep it under the rug? I don't have a reason for why whites commit crimes but I'm not trying to explain them or excuse them.
Originally posted by greenplastic And saying that slavery/jim crow have not influenced the trajectory of success among blacks in America is just straight up denial. The fact that Japanese Americans were put in internment camps and seemed to turn out alright is irrelevant to the fact that slavery and racism are/were real and affected black people.
Slavery and racism against asians was and is real in the us, I used the internment camps as an example because it's one that people that are still alive or were recently alive lived through and yet they don't do the same as blacks, there's no asian version of detroit.
No one alive was involved in the US slave trade as merchant or merchandise.
Originally posted by Number13 I don't believe I have said any race is inferior or superior here and no, I measure the worth of a race by the weight of their impact on the world, culturally, historically and economically, which asians and whites have a more or less equal share of.
But I by no means ask that this be the standard, nor am I trying to force my opinion on you.
Originally posted by greenplastic Is this not you ranking races and saying that whites and asians are superior to other races?
lol
See this is where my problem with people like you lie. I'm not going to try to convince finny to not be racist. His head is far up his ass, for sure, but at least he's consistent. He totally believes that blacks are inferior to whites etc and you'll never change his mind. But he doesn't fool himself with half assed attempts to prove to himself that he's not racist. Like if you just use logic these things fall apart very quickly with any level of analysis.
First of all, I am racist, openly.
Second of all is that the english language is read left to right which is an important thing to keep in mind for my post(the quote above) up to the point of that post I had not said anyone was superior or inferior, and once again I was replying to you, please do read what you have said so that you don't misconstrue what I'm saying.
Originally posted by greenplastic Also I'm genuinely curious, what is your idea of an opinion? I've always thought of my opinion as something that is constantly being molded by reality and my experiences of the world. I think that some people treat it more as a sacred part of their identity, where they can have at least that thing be true to them no matter what. If your definition is along the lines of the second one, I can understand your position.
I don't know what to say to this, my opinion changes when adequate and verifiable information is considered, none of you have provided that so far so I'm unsure why you brought this up, I've used sourced statistics, you have used supposition. -
2017-11-21 at 9:32 PM UTC in Best way to dieCutting the stomach with a second taking your head
-
2017-11-21 at 10:44 AM UTC in Apparently we were kings and shit
Originally posted by inb4l0pht Out of Africa has a lot of empirical support and is most likely correct, but it was only the beginning of divergent human evolution. Africans are the original homo sapiens sapiens, Europeans are a new and superior subspecies.
I mean I win either way, if we evolved in europe/many different places then we didn't come from niggers and if we did come out of compton then we are more evolved by simple fact of us having to deal with more/other challenges, works for me. -
2017-11-20 at 5:13 PM UTC in This Is What You Get With Diversity.
Originally posted by greenplastic Well more blacks are poor.
What is it that you make thinks black people commit crimes at higher rates than whites then? If you don't believe it's correlated with economic position but solely with race, there must be some cause of it. If slavery and the displacement of hundreds of thousands of people cannot be cited as a reason for the failure of blacks, what do you think it is? Something inherent in DNA? You must have some semi-logical reason for believing that if you are doubting every other logical explanation.
Surely if it were only because of economic position there would be far less violent crimes, virtually zero in fact, and far far more cases of theft and fraud?
Also considering there are just under half as many whites in poverty than blacks it would stand to reason, by your logic, that percentage wise whites would be responsible for half as many crimes as blacks, which by my previous statistics is false.
Unless you hold blacks and whites to different standards that is.
Even if economics is the main reason then there would still be a relatively large number of black crimes which cannot hold economic position as the cause.
It could be in their dna, I can't say for sure, it could be that blacks are just predisposed to violence, maybe it's their inherent ooga booga tribalism or their gibsmedat mentality.
If prejudice and the remnants of slavery had anything to do with this the US would never have had a black president, that is equal opportunity in action.
Originally posted by greenplastic And if this is true, am I right to assume you are also saying that whites are inferior to Asians, since they statistically are more "successful" than whites and less likely to commit crimes? What decides this racial hierarchy? I'm honestly curious. I personally think you are compensating for some insecurity or fear of blacks or the declining influence of whites but I want to see if you can actually string together an opinion that at least doesn't contradict itself.
I don't believe I have said any race is inferior or superior here and no, I measure the worth of a race by the weight of their impact on the world, culturally, historically and economically, which asians and whites have a more or less equal share of.
But I by no means ask that this be the standard, nor am I trying to force my opinion on you.
It's the declining influence of whites bit, I'd mention rhodesia but it's already been mentioned.
