User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 383
  6. 384
  7. 385
  8. 386
  9. 387
  10. 388
  11. ...
  12. 638
  13. 639
  14. 640
  15. 641

Posts by gadzooks

  1. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    I didn't even know there were different salts.

    I mean, it makes sense to me, but I'm too much of a chemistry noob to have realized that on my own.

    Can any transactinide be used to create a salt?

    Or maybe it's not something transactinides have in common but some other categorization.

    Phosphorous, Sulfur, Carbon, and Nitrogen are all transactinides though.
  2. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL It comes down to the equal application of law and order has to take priority over personal comforts. Finny only posts like that because so many retards are allowed to post whatever nonsensical garbage drops out of their ass. Us practical posters have had to put up with that for decades. Equal application of justice. If they're OK to repeatedly post nonsensical, annoying, garbage, in every thread, why shouldn't finny be able to as well? He's just sick of the double-standard. What's good for the goose would be good for the gander, right? You mean the kidiots can dish it out, but they can't take it? I said from day one that Lanny needed to lay down simple, basic ground rules and apply them evenly to everyone, or there would be trouble, but he decided that wasn't required. That arbitrary behavior was OK. That it would work. I mean, why have discussion forums at all if it's all just Half Baked? May as well just have one single, long-ass thread, amirite?

    Ok I see a valid point in there... When Lanny banned infinityshock for a century or millenium or whatever, he had to make a judgment call. There is no way to codify an exact procedure for dealing with EVERY. POSSIBLE. OUTCOME. when it comes to moderating an Internet forum.

    YOU (and others) might disagree with the way he made his judgment call.

    But, keeping with the real-world analogy... If some asshole was beaking off on your sidewalk for DAYS, maybe even WEEKS or MONTHS... Heck, let's say it's not even you, but someone else who matters to you... they come complaining to you about some asshole TECHNICALLY ABIDING THE LAW, but "harassing" them all the same... There would come a point where, if the law failed to respond (because maybe they simply can't find a way to deal with the situation legally - i.e. the asshole found a loophole), you would consider approaching things in a different way, or you would be trying to find your own "reverse-loophole", for lack of a better term.

    Lanny is not responsible for establishing the rules of an entire society in all their complexity. He has to define some fundamental guiding principles, and then make judgment calls within certain fringe cases, and infinityshock is definitely one of those fringe cases.

    Governing an Internet forum is not exactly on the same level of governing, say, a country, but apparently, as infinityshock has demonstrated, it will sometimes result in some complex requirements.

    The only alternatives are:
    1. Turn this place into a democracy (and I have a strong feeling that more people would favor Finny's ban than those that wouldn't - AND, even worse, if this becomes a full on democracy, then if 51% of people decide that X constitutes hate speech, then X is banned. THAT is a slippery fucking slope man.
    2. We defer judgment to Lanny.
    3. We create an alternative site. I see absolutely no reason to do this, personally, but it's a free country and ANYONE out there can do the same.
  3. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by -SpectraL So you would have rathered him just fade away into the shadows with his 999 year bogus ban, eh? Less messy.. for you?

    Okay, if you want the straight up honest truth, I just find him plain old obnoxious - BUT, not only that, it reaches a level that... it's like they need a new word for something even more obnoxious than obnoxious.

    It gets to the point that I favor a by-the-books-approach that RESULTS IN finny being banned over a by-the-books-approach that DOES NOT.

    I do care about freedom of speech.

    But freedom of speech DOES NOT encompass LITERALLY EVERYTHING.

    If some ass hat set up camp on the sidewalk outside your domicile (sidewalk == public property), and just yelled shit all day outside your house that was annoying to you, or even personally targeted/offensive... if you're telling me that you wouldn't, eventually, want to get rid of that asshole, you are STRAIGHT UP LYING.

    That's what finny is doing. That's what finny has been doing since BEFORE HIS BAN.
  4. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    I only recently discovered that I have a bunch of unused tax write-off carryovers from previous years (college tuition stuff mostly - my annual income was practically $0... times were tough - but I at least get to declare those deductions now).

    When my return comes in, I'mma buy soooo much drugs on the deep web they're gonna indict my mail carrier on RICO charges.
  5. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Ghost I want to take all of Infinityshocks posts and make an AI out of them.

    Funny you should mention that...

    I have a project in the works right now that is basically a set of AI "chatbots" (the term can apply to Internet forums as well) that are trained using actual posts from frequent posters... And finny is among them.

    I've said it before, and I'll say it again, I don't much like Finny posts for the most part... ESPECIALLY as of late. But he was at least somewhat unique and entertaining at one time.

    The sad fact, though, is that because all of his posts now are IDENTICAL, if I feed them into the mix, it will basically just result in a bot that says the exact same thing over and over again, and, I really can't see how that could be anything but incredibly boring.
  6. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
  7. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    And then add reproduction to that, and you have 7+ billion organisms simply creating new organisms to eat, hydrate, exercise, and eliminate waste...

    Heck... "eliminate waste" is kind of a misnomer... We PRODUCE waste.

    So we have billions of organisms consuming from our environment, and then producing waste, all frantically seeking any and all opportunities to create yet more such organisms.

    I'm professor of Misanthropology at Cambridge. I do a whole series of lectures on this very topic.
  8. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Ok I just realized a potential issue with my original code...

    It's probably better to wrap THE WHOLE THING in a conditional that first checks that you're even on NiS.

    There's no point in having your browser search, well, anything, if you aren't on NiS (since the script's logic is based on how NiS is represented in terms of HTML and so on).


    if (window.location.hostname === 'niggasin.space') {


    ORIGINAL SCRIPT...


    };


    Or in full...


    if (window.location.hostname === 'niggasin.space') {
    var posts = document.getElementsByClassName('post');

    for (var i = 0; i < posts.length; i++) {

    var post = posts[i];

    var user = post.getElementsByClassName('user-block')[0].getElementsByTagName('a')[0];

    var user_id = parseInt(user.href.split("/").slice(-1)[0]);
    var user_name = user.innerText;

    console.log(user_id);
    console.log(user_name);

    if (user_id > 5791) {
    console.log("User, "+user_name+", has been blocked.");
    post.innerHTML = "<div style='color: #D5DEE5;'>User, "+user_name+", has been blocked.</div>";
    };

    };
    };
  9. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]


  10. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    I also just realized that if one were so inclined, they could easily reverse word enhancements with a very slight modification of the above script (although they would have to store an entire associative array for each specific phrase and it's enhancemented result). I'm personally not bothered enough by the word enhancements to do that though, but it's a thought that occurred to me.

    Also, one could make their own word enhancements, but that would probably get boring if you're the only one seeing them...

  11. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Women drink cola, men drink colo.
  12. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Sophie GreaseMonkey script looks a lot like JavaScript. Hey, talk about JS. Are you familiar with NodeJS?

    Yeah I had heard of GreaseMonkey but never actually played around with it (until today). It turns out it's just like appending your own <script></script> block at the end of the document for every page that renders.

    And yeah I have worked with Node before. Python (Flask for web frameworks) like infinitely more, but I have worked with Node.
  13. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Grylls homo

    Pollo.
  14. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Posting for an example.
  15. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Ahh, no more dick spam.

    Here's an example of it in action:

  16. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    So, after over two decades of Internet exposure (I started with dial-up back before graphical browsers were even a thing), someone has finally come along that has actually made me feel the necessity for the capability to block users on an Internet forum. One poster in over 2 decades. I always thought blocking other users was for pussies, but there comes a point where it's just plain practical.

    So, without further ado, I introduce you all to the first iteration of my script:


    var posts = document.getElementsByClassName('post');

    console.log(posts);

    for (var i = 0; i < posts.length; i++) {

    var post = posts[i];

    var user = post.getElementsByClassName('user-block')[0].getElementsByTagName('a')[0];

    var user_id = parseInt(user.href.split("/").slice(-1)[0]);
    var user_name = user.innerText;

    console.log(user_id);
    console.log(user_name);

    if (user_id > 5791) {
    console.log("User, "+user_name+", has been blocked.");
    post.innerHTML = "<div style='color: #D5DEE5;'>User, "+user_name+", has been blocked.</div>";
    };

    };


    Now, there might very well be others out there, even specifically for NiS... No idea. But what this one currently does, is it basically just blocks posts from every user that has registered as of ~yesterday.

    I'll probably tweak it to be more versatile over time, but for now, it's sufficient.

    I would also add a search for "infinityshock", but, I imagine that would be pretty quickly overcome.

    Also, this is clearly meant to be a temporary plugin, because it essentially "closes registration", in effect.

    But it might be helpful for some of you right now.

    If you don't use Firefox, I'm pretty sure there's an equivalent addon for Chrome and other browsers.
  17. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Some polo-wearing cholo stole my Rolo, put out a BOLO!

    Fuck it, I'mma go after him solo, cuz YOLO!
  18. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Grylls
    Originally posted by gadzooks
    Originally posted by Grylls Favourites


    Football
    Favourite Football

    Horse Racing
    Favourite Horse Racing

    Virtual Horse Racing
    Favourite Virtual Horse Racing

    A-Z Sports


    American Football
    Favourite American Football

    Athletics
    Favourite Athletics

    Aussie Rules
    Favourite Aussie Rules

    Baseball
    Favourite Baseball

    Basketball
    Favourite Basketball

    Boxing
    Favourite Boxing

    Cricket
    Favourite Cricket

    Cycling
    Favourite Cycling

    Darts
    Favourite Darts

    ESports
    Favourite ESports

    Football
    Favourite Football

    Formula 1
    Favourite Formula 1

    Gaelic Games
    Favourite Gaelic Games

    Golf
    Favourite Golf

    Greyhound Racing
    Favourite Greyhound Racing

    Handball
    Favourite Handball

    Horse Racing
    Favourite Horse Racing

    Ice Hockey
    Favourite Ice Hockey

    Lotto
    Favourite Lotto

    Motor Sport
    Favourite Motor Sport

    Music Specials
    Favourite Music Specials

    Netball
    Favourite Netball

    Politics
    Favourite Politics

    Rugby League
    Favourite Rugby League

    Rugby Union
    Favourite Rugby Union

    Snooker
    Favourite Snooker

    Speciality Bets
    Favourite Speciality Bets

    Speedway
    Favourite Speedway

    Squash
    Favourite Squash

    TV and Film Specials
    Favourite TV and Film Specials

    Tennis
    Favourite Tennis

    UFC and MMA
    Favourite UFC and MMA

    Virtual Football
    Favourite Virtual Football

    Virtual Greyhounds
    Favourite Virtual Greyhounds

    Virtual Horse Racing
    Favourite Virtual Horse Racing

    Virtual Horse Racing Jumps
    Favourite Virtual Horse Racing Jumps

    Virtual Motor Racing
    Favourite Virtual Motor Racing

    Virtual Speedway
    Favourite Virtual Speedway

    Volleyball
    Favourite Volleyball

    Winter Sports
    Favourite Winter Sports

    Wrestling
    Favourite Wrestling

    My Bets
    Sky Bet logo
    Join Log in
    73:49
    Chelsea

    0
    Manchester Utd

    Ander Herrera (31')P. Pogba (45')

    2
    BBC One

    Pitch
    Events
    Line-ups
    NewPlayer Stats
    Stats
    Score Centre

    MNU: Throw-in
    Bets placed in accordance with our Market Rules

    All markets will be settled on 90 mins unless stated otherwise

    Win 66/1
    Draw 10/1
    Win 1/16
    Chelsea
    8/1
    Manchester Utd
    1/25
    Latest
    Boost
    Willian to score the 3rd goal in 90 mins


    Eden Hazard to score in 90 mins
    4/1
    5/1
    Winner of interval (61-75 mins) - Chelsea


    Cesar Azpilicueta (90 Mins Only) to be carded in 90 mins
    4/1
    Susp
    Correct Score - Manchester Utd 3-1 in 90 mins
    12/1
    14/1
    Willian to have 1+ Shots on Target in 90 minutes (0 so far)
    6/4
    P. Pogba to have 2+ Shots on Target in 90 minutes (1 so far)
    11/4
    E. Hazard & G. Higuain Each to have 1+ Shots On Target in 90 minutes
    11/2
    M. Rashford to have 3+ Shots on Target in 90 minutes (1 so far)

    E. Hazard, M. Rashford & P. Pogba to have 6+ shots on target between them in 90 minutes (2 so far)
    18/1

    Please refer to the RequestABet rules before placing any bets. Booking Pts: Yellow = 10, Red = 25, 2 Yellows leading to 1 Red With Dismissal = 35. Corners: Only corners that are actually taken will count.

    Herrera & Matic to be carded
    5/2
    Herrera & Young to be carded
    5/2
    Herrera, Matic & Young to be carded
    5/2
    Over 2.5 goals and Herrera & Matic to be carded
    9/2
    Over 2.5 goals and Herrera & Young to be carded
    9/2
    Shaw & Matic to be carded
    9/2
    Shaw & Young to be carded
    9/2
    Shaw, Matic & Young to be carded
    9/2
    Hazard to score and Matic to be carded
    5/1
    Hazard to score and Young to be carded
    5/1
    Show All
    Under 3.5 goals and 11+ match corners
    8/13
    Over 2.5 goals and 11+ match corners
    11/8
    Over 2.5 goals, 11+ match corners and 35+ match booking points
    Susp
    Under 2.5 goals and 11+ match corners
    15/8
    Over 3.5 goals and 11+ match corners
    11/2
    Over 1.5 goals each team and 6+ match corners each team
    7/1
    Under 3.5 goals and under 11 match corners
    11/4
    Over 2.5 goals and under 11 match corners
    4/1
    Chelsea over 1.5 goals, Chelsea 6+ corners and Chelsea 3+ cards
    Susp
    Over 3.5 goals, 13+ match corners and 45+ match booking points
    Susp
    Show All
    Chelsea
    11/8
    No Goal
    11/10
    Manchester Utd
    4/1
    Home
    Draw
    Away
    3-2 66/1
    2-2 12/1
    0-2 11/10

    3-3 200/1
    1-2 5/2


    0-3 13/2


    1-3 12/1


    2-3 40/1


    0-4 50/1


    1-4 100/1







    Important information on In-Play betting Terms and Conditions

    Football Chelsea v Manchester Utd

    Super 6
    ● ● ●
    0My Bet Slip

    You have no selections in your Bet Slip
    Go to In-Play betsBuild an AccumulatorNext Races

    No.

    yes

    Favourites


    Football
    Favourite Football

    Horse Racing
    Favourite Horse Racing

    Virtual Horse Racing
    Favourite Virtual Horse Racing

    A-Z Sports


    American Football
    Favourite American Football

    Athletics
    Favourite Athletics

    Aussie Rules
    Favourite Aussie Rules

    Baseball
    Favourite Baseball

    Basketball
    Favourite Basketball

    Boxing
    Favourite Boxing

    Cricket
    Favourite Cricket

    Cycling
    Favourite Cycling

    Darts
    Favourite Darts

    ESports
    Favourite ESports

    Football
    Favourite Football

    Formula 1
    Favourite Formula 1

    Gaelic Games
    Favourite Gaelic Games

    Golf
    Favourite Golf

    Greyhound Racing
    Favourite Greyhound Racing

    Handball
    Favourite Handball

    Horse Racing
    Favourite Horse Racing

    Ice Hockey
    Favourite Ice Hockey

    Lotto
    Favourite Lotto

    Motor Sport
    Favourite Motor Sport

    Music Specials
    Favourite Music Specials

    Netball
    Favourite Netball

    Politics
    Favourite Politics

    Rugby League
    Favourite Rugby League

    Rugby Union
    Favourite Rugby Union

    Snooker
    Favourite Snooker

    Speciality Bets
    Favourite Speciality Bets

    Speedway
    Favourite Speedway

    Squash
    Favourite Squash

    TV and Film Specials
    Favourite TV and Film Specials

    Tennis
    Favourite Tennis

    UFC and MMA
    Favourite UFC and MMA

    Virtual Football
    Favourite Virtual Football

    Virtual Greyhounds
    Favourite Virtual Greyhounds

    Virtual Horse Racing
    Favourite Virtual Horse Racing

    Virtual Horse Racing Jumps
    Favourite Virtual Horse Racing Jumps

    Virtual Motor Racing
    Favourite Virtual Motor Racing

    Virtual Speedway
    Favourite Virtual Speedway

    Volleyball
    Favourite Volleyball

    Winter Sports
    Favourite Winter Sports

    Wrestling
    Favourite Wrestling

    My Bets
    Sky Bet logo
    Join Log in
    73:49
    Chelsea

    0
    Manchester Utd

    Ander Herrera (31')P. Pogba (45')

    2
    BBC One

    Pitch
    Events
    Line-ups
    NewPlayer Stats
    Stats
    Score Centre

    MNU: Throw-in
    Bets placed in accordance with our Market Rules

    All markets will be settled on 90 mins unless stated otherwise

    Win 66/1
    Draw 10/1
    Win 1/16
    Chelsea
    8/1
    Manchester Utd
    1/25
    Latest
    Boost
    Willian to score the 3rd goal in 90 mins


    Eden Hazard to score in 90 mins
    4/1
    5/1
    Winner of interval (61-75 mins) - Chelsea


    Cesar Azpilicueta (90 Mins Only) to be carded in 90 mins
    4/1
    Susp
    Correct Score - Manchester Utd 3-1 in 90 mins
    12/1
    14/1
    Willian to have 1+ Shots on Target in 90 minutes (0 so far)
    6/4
    P. Pogba to have 2+ Shots on Target in 90 minutes (1 so far)
    11/4
    E. Hazard & G. Higuain Each to have 1+ Shots On Target in 90 minutes
    11/2
    M. Rashford to have 3+ Shots on Target in 90 minutes (1 so far)

    E. Hazard, M. Rashford & P. Pogba to have 6+ shots on target between them in 90 minutes (2 so far)
    18/1

    Please refer to the RequestABet rules before placing any bets. Booking Pts: Yellow = 10, Red = 25, 2 Yellows leading to 1 Red With Dismissal = 35. Corners: Only corners that are actually taken will count.

    Herrera & Matic to be carded
    5/2
    Herrera & Young to be carded
    5/2
    Herrera, Matic & Young to be carded
    5/2
    Over 2.5 goals and Herrera & Matic to be carded
    9/2
    Over 2.5 goals and Herrera & Young to be carded
    9/2
    Shaw & Matic to be carded
    9/2
    Shaw & Young to be carded
    9/2
    Shaw, Matic & Young to be carded
    9/2
    Hazard to score and Matic to be carded
    5/1
    Hazard to score and Young to be carded
    5/1
    Show All
    Under 3.5 goals and 11+ match corners
    8/13
    Over 2.5 goals and 11+ match corners
    11/8
    Over 2.5 goals, 11+ match corners and 35+ match booking points
    Susp
    Under 2.5 goals and 11+ match corners
    15/8
    Over 3.5 goals and 11+ match corners
    11/2
    Over 1.5 goals each team and 6+ match corners each team
    7/1
    Under 3.5 goals and under 11 match corners
    11/4
    Over 2.5 goals and under 11 match corners
    4/1
    Chelsea over 1.5 goals, Chelsea 6+ corners and Chelsea 3+ cards
    Susp
    Over 3.5 goals, 13+ match corners and 45+ match booking points
    Susp
    Show All
    Chelsea
    11/8
    No Goal
    11/10
    Manchester Utd
    4/1
    Home
    Draw
    Away
    3-2 66/1
    2-2 12/1
    0-2 11/10

    3-3 200/1
    1-2 5/2


    0-3 13/2


    1-3 12/1


    2-3 40/1


    0-4 50/1


    1-4 100/1







    Important information on In-Play betting Terms and Conditions

    Football Chelsea v Manchester Utd

    Super 6
    ● ● ●
    0My Bet Slip

    You have no selections in your Bet Slip
    Go to In-Play betsBuild an AccumulatorNext Races

    Absolutely not.
  19. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
    Originally posted by Sophie Also, if he really wanted to he could just ban everyone he didn't like outright, because the website is hosted on a server he pays for and runs software he himself designed and wrote.

    This means that this website and the very software it runs on is Lanny's property, and he can kick you off if he wants and he would be morally well within his rights to do so. Since he doesn't do that though evidenced by the fact that he even lets you post here really takes the wind out of your sails with regards to what you said.

    EX-ACTLY!

    I've been saying this for weeks/months/whatever now...

    There are so many examples of people being allowed to express "anti-Lanny" opinions that I really shouldn't have to dig any up as a demonstration... It's pretty self-evident.

    So why is infinityshock literally the only example of Lanny allegedly being biased and banning someone he simply doesn't like?
  20. gadzooks Dark Matter [keratinize my mild-tasting blossoming]
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 383
  6. 384
  7. 385
  8. 386
  9. 387
  10. 388
  11. ...
  12. 638
  13. 639
  14. 640
  15. 641
Jump to Top