User Controls
Posts by The Self Taught Man
-
2017-02-10 at 6:55 AM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin
-
2017-02-10 at 6:49 AM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshinWhy dont you just take bundy malice. 30mg really makes a difference if you are having an off day with smoking which happens to me every now and then.
I have athsma and I just started smoking cigs so sometimes I take a bundy and it helps with coughing.
Also smoking pipes and joints irritates me up really bad, bongs with ice and hot/cold water is perfect, or a vape. -
2017-02-10 at 6:46 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straight
Originally posted by Actor cuz i didnt have ne
Post last edited by Actor at 2017-02-10T06:42:23.871542+00:00
So put the shit in a cool dark place and get some weed you fucking nigger.
I can't even touch psychedelics, or MDMA without weed, fuck that. I have had too many bad trips to not want to be stuck in that state, I know other people that won't ever take a psychedelic without a xanax on them for emergency, but I guess thats more "mainstream" these days.
Even meth and heroin I was smoking high quality weed the whole time and it helps with the bad effects of hard drugs. Truly a miracle plant. -
2017-02-10 at 6:45 AM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin
Originally posted by Malice I do it because my lungs are a pair of bitches (nowhere near as bad as you, though). I'm sure the standard hikikomori household air quality contributes considerably to this. Then again, outside of this environment, I may have essentially gained immune system super powers. I never really become seriously ill, maybe the common cold for a few days a year.
Also disagree that it's particularly unhealthy. The cough response can lead to irritation and is often greatly disproportionate to what is needed. You can clear your lungs fine without a harsh involuntary cough.
Oh, I'm also interested in trying BPC-157 to repair my GI tract and decrease inflammation. It has a high bioavailability. Really remarkable substance, BPC stands for Body Protective Compound: https://www.reddit.com/r/Nootropics/comments/5raknu/bpc157_a_healing_peptide_summary_of_known_benefits/?st=iyzg2osy&sh=6fd7e139
you have a low IQ -
2017-02-10 at 6:45 AM UTC in Site not secure?I believe most sites that "default" use automatic redirects. Many host and domain providers offer free redirects.
It's honestly not important honestly, just asking. I think it also works if you only have a redirect on one page, for example the index, correct me if I'm wrong for thinking all subsequent actions will simply be https as a result. -
2017-02-10 at 6:43 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straighti wonder if i can stay high for a month+ off nutmeg. i'd have to take 10 jutnegs every 3 days, and there are 30 in a 5$ pack. so 15$ for 27 days of tripping, 45$ will last almost 3 months of being high 24/7. there's a tolerance gain over a few days so add 10 or 20 dollars more if you dont want the effects to trail off. is anyone up to trying this? i'd do it but i still have school.
-
2017-02-10 at 6:40 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straight
-
2017-02-10 at 6:39 AM UTC in The mind is a meat radio.
Originally posted by Lanny It seems perfectly fair to say a coin being heads up is a function of it being tails down and vice versa, one fact is reducible to another. If a coin is in the heads down state this entails it must also be in the heads up state.
Yes but it's a matter of coincidence rather than cause. One could model one as a function of the other, but the context in which you said that implied that one determined the outcome of the other, but I don't think it's useful or even accurate to say that the heads side is up *because* the tails side is down; one simply accompanies the other.That's true, is that the position you want to take? That together the state of two entangled particles represents one "roll of the dice"?
To the best of our knowledge, they are both independent "rolls", which are 100% guaranteed to be the opposite of each other.Why in this case? Do you think that a best current model should always be considered a physical reality or do you think there's something special about this case? If the latter, what is it?
I think when the alternative explanation is literally impossible without tossing out the established workings of mathematics and principles of logic, I think it's as close to being a physical reality as possible.
However, even if we move past that, you could make this argument for anything, it's simply not useful; how can you make a strong positive statement that evolution is real and anthropogenic climate change is actually happening? You can't deductively prove them. But when we're like 99.99% sure, I think there needs to be some evidence of the remaining 1% before we stop and give it any consideration in the discussions we base upon the conclusions drawn from the outcome. At every branch up the tree of knowledge, I could point out 1000 different explanations from established science. But we still talk about the established science in the context of our discussions of science, because it's as close to the truth as it gets.I can't speak to scientific consensus. I can say that Bell's Theorem alone certainly doesn't close the book on the subject, at minimum it has nothing to say about non-local deterministic models.
True. But two points:
1. The idea of a non local variable being responsible for the seemingly random outcome of quantum events is such an overwhelmingly huge special case that would require tearing down many, many walls of already established, mathematically and experimentally supported science upon which we have built existing science. For example, the entire relativistic model of physics. And you'd need to have some pretty compelling evidence of it existing before it's worth entertaining the thought.
2. The non-local hidden variable, if it indeed exists, also cannot be the explanation for why a particle's wave function collapses in a specific way. Even a non-local variable would fall into the same trap. There is room for a non-local variable explanation for entanglement but resorting to an explanation that violates locality is even more difficult to justify, specially since we literally have no reason to believe it, and lots and lots of reasons not to.Can you point to any evidence that there is in fact "overwhelming scientific consensus" that I could consult without reading a bunch of back issues of journals of physics? I'm not trying to be facetious, if there really is that degree of consensus on the subject I'd like to be able to say I know that from some source other than some guy on the internet (to put it charitably)
No, you're being 100% reasonable. I've kept in the loop because of a personal interest in the sciences and it wouldn't be fair to expect you to take me at my word. I can say with confidence that the Copenhagen interpretation is what we use in almost every capacity in the modern day for science, but it's reasonable to expect my to give evidence that it is in fact overwhelmingly the most accepted and used view of QM. But I'll have to search for it, I don't imagine it's very common for someone to make the statement that a particular view is the consensus, specially since physics as a field almost never makes positive statements about something not being true, or being impossible. -
2017-02-10 at 6:37 AM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin
-
2017-02-10 at 6:36 AM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin^waterfall bong hits
-
2017-02-10 at 6:35 AM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshinTake ZBZ and CCC and you can smoke 7 bowls in a row and smoke a cigarette and you couldn't cough if you wanted to.
And guaifenisen. -
2017-02-10 at 6:34 AM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin
-
2017-02-10 at 6:33 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straightCCC gives me amnesia but I can't stomach cough gels or syrup anymore.
-
2017-02-10 at 6:30 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straighti agree guaf changes the bundy effects but to me it makes the high dirtier and have less visuals/more amnesia
-
2017-02-10 at 6:28 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straight
Originally posted by Actor
Guaifenesin increases the analgesic effect of paracetamol (acetaminophen) and aspirin, increases the sedative effects of alcohol, tranquilisers, sleep-pills and total anesthetics
Guaifenesin has muscle relaxant and anticonvulsant properties and may be acting as an NMDA receptor antagonist.
Fucking Retard who doesn't even smoke weed when you do LSD. -
2017-02-10 at 6:25 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straightahhhhh da dag daaaaa medddd dnuddddddd
-
2017-02-10 at 6:23 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straight
-
2017-02-10 at 6:20 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straightnudmedddddddd juddneddddd nudddjedddd
-
2017-02-10 at 6:15 AM UTC in WE DIDNT START THE FIAAAH!!!
-
2017-02-10 at 6:14 AM UTC in ive been high for 7 days straightnuddmmeeggeg