User Controls
The Retarded Thread: Get Rekt, Faggot!
-
2017-12-08 at 3:51 AM UTC
Originally posted by LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery you always try to find something to be a snob about to distract yourself from the fact that you're a complete loser
you're a heroin addict on probation who made the news for punching his mom
im a college student with a loving family
also you're stupid and totally boring/uncreative -
2017-12-08 at 3:53 AM UTC
-
2017-12-08 at 3:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by jimmy you're a heroin addict on probation who made the news for punching his mom
im a college student with a loving family
also you're stupid and totally boring/uncreative
I distinctly remember that time you yelled your mom awake into a panic attack while recording so that you could upload it to youtube.
Then there's the time you tried to stab them and falsely accuse your dad of molesting you. -
2017-12-08 at 3:54 AM UTChttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corwin_Amendment
how do you explain the north ratifying a constitutional amendment that essentially protected slavery in an attempt to prevent the secession of the south? -
2017-12-08 at 3:54 AM UTC
-
2017-12-08 at 3:57 AM UTCactually for context, this article (https://www.paulcraigroberts.org/2017/08/23/know-called-civil-war-not-slavery/) is what I read that goes into detail on the matter
-
2017-12-08 at 3:58 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corwin_Amendment
how do you explain the north ratifying a constitutional amendment that essentially protected slavery in an attempt to prevent the secession of the south?
I never said the war was fought over slavery, just that it was an essential economic factor. -
2017-12-08 at 4:10 AM UTC
Originally posted by 哈哈你看不懂中文 I never said the war was fought over slavery, just that it was an essential economic factor.
that's just trickery though.
The common implication today (not necessarily that you said it, but it's almost universal) is that the war was fought over the morality of slavery. If that article is correct (it seems to be cited fairly well), slavery specifically was of little importance; the north didn't care if the south wanted to keep slaves, their only real concern was keeping economic power through taxes and tariffs. -
2017-12-08 at 4:12 AM UTCWait, sploo got into college?
-
2017-12-08 at 4:13 AM UTCIt's snowing..
-
2017-12-08 at 4:15 AM UTCAren't you in FL? How is that possible?
-
2017-12-08 at 4:18 AM UTC
-
2017-12-08 at 4:19 AM UTC
-
2017-12-08 at 4:27 AM UTCSold my soul for an Audemar Pigot,
Murdered my fiance for a new Rolex,
I just got a call from the CEO of sudafed,
he said "RestStop your movin' too much crystal meth". -
2017-12-08 at 4:36 AM UTCLOLOLOL!
-
2017-12-08 at 4:37 AM UTC
-
2017-12-08 at 4:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by 哈哈你看不懂中文 You're just upset because I'm better than you will ever be.
you lost your virginity at 21 to hydro. you said a fat phillipino girl is out of your league. you're a handsome and well tanned individual too. you're stupid as fuck but convinced you're "enlightened"and intelligent even though you just post cringey beta male bullshit all of time. paint your walls with your brain. since im not ugly and stupid the girlfriends had were blonde russian girls, and i lost my virginity almost 10 years before you. and you have average intelligence at best. i want to squash you like a bug for being such a waste of genetics and your absent father's sperm cells -
2017-12-08 at 4:43 AM UTCyou write shitty books that no one reads
i literally design valid intelligence tests as a hobby that hundreds of people take -
2017-12-08 at 4:50 AM UTCShut up you useless fat bitch.
-
2017-12-08 at 4:52 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra that's just trickery though.
The common implication today (not necessarily that you said it, but it's almost universal) is that the war was fought over the morality of slavery. If that article is correct (it seems to be cited fairly well), slavery specifically was of little importance; the north didn't care if the south wanted to keep slaves, their only real concern was keeping economic power through taxes and tariffs.
I guess, but slavery *is* super essential to why they had economic problems in the first place. Massive propaganda campaign for people to fight against slavery is important too. That kind of shit is always used to rile people to fight. Something like 10% of the Union was black too. If you had phrased it slightly differently I wouldn't have gone autistic on you.
There's a book by Harry Turtledove that I've been wanting to read about the south winning the war. I think it's in the 1980's or something. Interesting concept. Would change politics dramatically. Too bad he's a shitty writer.