User Controls
Posts by arthur treacher
-
2015-07-10 at 3:10 PM UTC in The "crazy eyes"Well, just imagine her fifteen years ago, or something.
-
2015-07-10 at 2:42 PM UTC in The "crazy eyes"I would probably put up with a lot of that bitch's craziness ^^^^
-
2015-07-10 at 2:34 PM UTC in What are you listening to right now, space nigga?go to the A on the top right of your post and there is a button with a place to enter a url.
Ah, I almost forgot...
-
2015-07-10 at 2:25 PM UTC in we are all niggas
-
2015-07-10 at 2:23 PM UTC in we are all niggasglad you made it over. there are like three threads just like this already, though. I mean, like, identical.
-
2015-07-10 at 1:54 PM UTC in attn: kolokolwhere the fuck is giygas, its been like two weeks
-
2015-07-10 at 1:13 PM UTC in donald trumpI need one of these signs:
-
2015-07-09 at 1:13 AM UTC in I HIT THE POINT PAST GO FASTI'm making tinctures out of various strains of Crouton in my kitchen....got a kilo altogether to process tonight.
-
2015-07-08 at 7:56 PM UTC in Myristicin is better than wood rose LSA and morning gloryHeh, shodan, you had a strong trip, apparently. I didn't have much nausea, except what was triggered by that wierd taste. I took HBWR, I have never tried morning glory seeds.
I have never tried nutmeg, I have heard it's a good phenethylamine-type trip, but that you feel terrible the next day, was that the case with you, §m£ÂgØL? I had some nutmeg extract for a while, but I never tried it and I think it got opened and used to cook with. You can get it at the health food store or order it online, it's way easier than eating whole nutmegs, and it works. I don't know if it's expensive or not. -
2015-07-08 at 7:48 PM UTC in Fucking kill yourself, New Zealand.I swear to god I posted this in spurious generalities....what the fuck
if you get a chance, can you move this lanny? thanks and sorry -
2015-07-08 at 7:40 PM UTC in Reddit comment deleter -- mactoYeah, this is why I change names every time I change sites. I am not sophisticated enough with computers to know if it helps much, but it makes me feel like I'm doing something proactive.
-
2015-07-08 at 7:37 PM UTC in Get your car questions answered here!This is potentially an awesome thread, but I just got a notice in the mail that my license is suspended, again.
-
2015-07-08 at 7:26 PM UTC in “The uniformed member then walked away without responding.â€There is more to the story at the link, and it says that video shows him 'crouching' behind her, then walking away, or something like that. I guess he wanted to glaze her donut.
-
2015-07-08 at 6:57 PM UTC in attn: kolokolAn explanation for this thread, if anyone cares: I have a forum that I opened because I fucking hated redfern's founders, and I offered some of my most loyal posters some free gifts for their sticking around and shitposting at my near-empty site. It wasn't a bribe or anything, as they had already been posting there on their own for a couple of months. It was just an expression of gratitude. You all missed out, I guess. The gifts were just some legal highs type stuff, and we have been discussing the merits of the various items ever since. I just brought the discussion over here, as I am posting here more than over there these days.
-
2015-07-08 at 6:41 PM UTC in attn: kolokolI forget
-
2015-07-08 at 6:09 PM UTC in Any wantreprenuers here?I guess I didn't explain the window thing properly. You know how those candles in the glass jars have the lids with the clear plastic or rubber seal? My window covering would have a softer, rubbery version of that, somewhat pliable, that would 'wedge' itself into the broken window space, and the clear covering would be larger than the seal, and serve as a transparent barrier and windscreen. I would think that the sheer variety of shapes of the back windows of cars, and the rarity of people having broken back windows, would make this idea less than feasible to manufacture.
-
2015-07-08 at 5:38 PM UTC in “The uniformed member then walked away without responding.â€http://nypost.com/2015/07/07/veteran-cop-accused-of-splashing-semen-on-co-worker/
A veteran NYPD sergeant allegedly splashed semen on a civilian employee as she walked down a hallway at One Police Plaza, where they both work, sources told The Post on Tuesday.
The victim, an administrative aide in her 60s, had just left the women’s rest room and was walking back to her office when Sgt. Michael Iscenko, 54, allegedly approached her from behind and splashed the substance on her leg and shoe, the source said.
“She suddenly felt something on her leg, looked down, and said to him, ‘What are you doing?’ “ the source said of the January incident.
“The uniformed member then walked away without responding.â€
The woman, whose name was not released, immediately complained to her superiors.
The substance on her leg was tested, and was confirmed to be semen, the source said.
The two are workplace acquaintances, the source said.
On Monday, the Manhattan DA’s Office obtained a warrant ordering the sergeant to provide a DNA sample so that a lab can determine if the substance is a match.
Iscenko, a divorcee from Long Island who is assigned to the Organized Crime Control Bureau, has been suspended. [FONT=pt-serif][SIZE=16px] [/SIZE][/FONT]
-
2015-07-08 at 5:18 PM UTC in California scam
Buy food stamps for half price is a lower scam than just not paying for food.
Whatever makes you feel better. I never said anything about 'low', or made any sort of moral judgements. I just said it wasn't that good of a scam, when you factor in the time and effort and the restrictions on having a job and all that stuff. Then I mentioned the food stamp thing, because it was the only thing I could think of that I would even bother with, I just don't smell any real money here. I usually shoot for multiplying my initial investments, but I would settle for doubling it. Not sure that it is even worth the effort, though, unless a deal sort of just fell into your lap or something. -
2015-07-08 at 4:59 PM UTC in Fucking kill yourself, New Zealand.I'm not sure if I broke the law with that title, but if I was in New Zealand, and posted that to someone, I could face three years in a New Zealand prison, getting my topknot braided by two huge maori warriors who may just try to murder each other over the right to tattoo their name and a bunch of stupid seagull shapes over every inch of my face.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/newzealand/11725668/New-Zealand-makes-internet-trolling-illegal.html
[FONT=georgia][SIZE=10px] [FONT=arial][SIZE=16px]Internet trolls face up to two years' jail in New Zealand under a controversial new law which bans “harmful digital communicationsâ€.
And under a parallel amendment to New Zealand's Crimes Act, a person who tells another to kill themselves faces up to three years in prison.
The law will help mitigate the harm caused by cyber-bulling and give victims a quick and effective means of redress, supporters said.
But critics said the law harms free speech and its fine print could threaten public interest journalism in the country.
• Online abuse: how to live a happy troll-free life on the internet
Under the Harmful Digital Communications Act in effect from this week, anyone convicted of “causing harm by posting digital communication†faces two years in prison and a $50,000 (NZ) (£6,500) fine, while businesses face fines of up to $200,000 (NZ).
Harmful communications can include truthful as well as false information, and “intimate visual recordings†such as nude or seminude pictures or video shared without permission.
The bill was introduced after a public outcry over the horrific "Roast Busters†scandal, in which a group of teenage boys from Auckland was accused of sexually assaulting drunk, under age girls and boasting about the acts on social media.
But in an editorial, New Zealand’s Dominion Post said while the law's intentions were good, it went too far and could "pick up in its drift-net the sorts of noise and criticism that make for the talk of a free societyâ€.
Noting it effectively bans online communications judged “indecentâ€, “false†or “used to harass an individualâ€, the Post asked if reports on political expense scandals, or cartoons that mock religious figures, may also be banned under the legislation.
The bill passed the New Zealand parliament with an overwhelming 116 to 5 majority.
Speaking against the bill, Greens MP Gareth Hughes said while its intent was noble, its definition of “harm" was “irresponsibly broadâ€, and said the law could damage journalism in the country.
Arguing what was not an offence offline should not be an offence online, Mr Hughes criticised the fact reporters were not exempt from the legislation, which he said may prevent them publishing online the same story about a corrupt MP which would be perfectly legal to publish in a newspaper.[/SIZE][/FONT]
[/SIZE][/FONT]
-
2015-07-08 at 4:46 PM UTC in attn: kolokolshitposting is where the money's at