User Controls
Posts by Kek
-
2016-03-14 at 8:04 PM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?I will now demonstrate that my Timeless δ still gives me a higher poster value and that I am less forum codependent.
Let us compare on the whole our 4 most active accounts on this forum. Your first was The Boobyverse X = X 1 = 0 and your second the holy ghost. My first was thelittlestnigger and my second is Kek.
The math for OP:
The Boobyverse X = X 1 = 0
Posts: 643
Thanks: 2
the holy ghost
Posts: 1294
Thanks: 132
1294 + 643 = 1937 posts
132 + 2 = 134 thanks
This gives you a Timeless δ of 14.46. Remember this is True Timeless δ since it takes into account all possible variables and combinations of the sum of all possible Situational δ
Now for me:
thelittlestnigger
Posts: 988
Thanks: 114
Kek
Posts: 433
Thanks: 136
988 + 433 = 1421 posts
114 + 136 = 250 thanks
This gives me a Timeless δ of 5.68.
You see if we account for your True Timeless δ we find that your poster value objectively decreases even though you have spent more time on the forums and made almost 500 more posts than I have. This objectively proves that you are 1. a low value poster and 2. more forum codependent.
[SIZE=24px]LOW
O
W[/SIZE]
[SIZE=48px]VALUE
A
L
U
E[/SIZE]
[SIZE=72px]SPLOO
P
L
O
O[/SIZE]
-
2016-03-14 at 7:27 PM UTC in Find out the truth about drugs at drugfreeworld.orgI think its the latter
-
2016-03-14 at 6:33 PM UTC in My dad is cringe?ITT: Bill Krozby's daddy issues.
If your mom is cringe and your dad is cringe you yourself are their cringe combined.
*megacringe* -
2016-03-14 at 6:21 PM UTC in The worst^Bill Krozby you need to cut out the posting, you've become obsolete a long time ago.
-
2016-03-14 at 6:19 PM UTC in Find out the truth about drugs at drugfreeworld.org
god you're annoying and boring
What a constructive and useful comment to this conversation that in no way conveys the fact that you are massively butthurt about how I have objectively better opinions than you.
not -
2016-03-14 at 6:17 PM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?
Because average posts per day is a function from the beginning of Time. Sδ is arbitrarily defining a posters value from a certain subset of time and Tδ is defining a posters value from all of time. In this case, you are comparing your Timeless δ to my Situational δ, because you are only using the posts I've made since you've started posting for your calculations. Since Sδ and Tδ and incompatible in equating value difference between multiple posters, the only way to solve for this inequality is to use my Timeless δ, which once again puts me at 6.7 and you at an negatively-valenced outlier quantity (above 11).
Keep trying you low value 9 poster. -
2016-03-14 at 12:01 PM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?See I am objectively high value since Presidential Candidate Donald Trump supports my position and thinks your low energy low value bs is ridiculous.
-
2016-03-14 at 11:44 AM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?The best fucking part about this is that I coined δ. Only a high value poster could come up with and comprehend that shit. A low val like you just takes it and attempts to morph it into something it isnt.
LOW
O
W
VALUE
A
L
U
E
-
2016-03-14 at 11:42 AM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?Again more wishful thinking. The math is right in front of you. According to the Law of Thanks I am a 3 and you are a 9. Twist those words low val. Eventually you might get something.
[greentext]>Timeless δ[/greentext]
[greentext]>Situational δ[/greentext]
Literally not even defined. These are made up terms that bear no regard to the topic at hand and at best are just philosophical mental masturbation since they have not and can not be demonstrated mathematically.
Nice edit on your OP by the way. You made the fucking formula but had to edit it an hour later? What a low value move by a love value poster. -
2016-03-14 at 11:29 AM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?The above is gibberish. You are just making up terms. The fact remains that in the same timeframe (2/6/16-3/14/16) I had lower forum codependency while having a higher thank count. This makes me objectively high value and you objectively low value. You are a 9 dude. Deal with it. I am a 3. Just face the fact that I am better than you by your own standard and move on.
Or is admitting your objective defeat too painful? If so just keep weaving words together. You know what they say about a money a typewriter and an infinite amount of time? Im sure its relate-able to your situation. -
2016-03-14 at 11:13 AM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?[greentext]>an average over time, accounting for all variables[/greentext]
Its shit like this that makes you low value. -
2016-03-14 at 11:02 AM UTC in A contest: What am I afraid of most?Normies fear rejection. People like you fear the step before it.
-
2016-03-14 at 10:57 AM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?HAHAHA what a low value edit. Such a fucking 9 man.
-
2016-03-14 at 10:56 AM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?
[greentext]>Any idiot can see that you didnt take into account the fact that you have been posting since September and I have started posting last month.[/greentext]
That doesn't change post frequency. Post frequency indicates the total amount of nolifing trying to attain 1:1 on this forum. You've tried hard, but what is your inherent ability?
My inherent ability is to decimate all other posters in terms of poster value. It is obvious that the universe is pushing me towards -1:1 post value which would, as stated earlier, basically make you my slave.[greentext]>m is equal to (n-1) + 1[/greentext]
K K K
K E K
K K K
[greentext]>not getting the joke that m = n[/greentext]
Your 9 is showing.[greentext]>Let us say in the time we both have been on the site shall determine our poster value.[/greentext]
It doesn't work that way. Post frequency indicates the amount of time training in a particular field, not the beginning date of posting.
This is silly and whimsical. I love childish thinking. Unfortunately you have spent exactly zero amount of time training in any particular feild. Posting frequency is obviously the frequency of which a user posts generally denoted in posts per day. To think that it has anything to do with "training" in particular "feilds" is a low value thought and shows that you do not have what it takes to be considered high value. You seem to fail to comprehend the objective fact that in the time I have been on this site I have gotten more thanks than you(me: 117 you: 61) and made less posts than you (Me: 400 you: ~800) in the same amount of time. If you know anything this obviously means that I have a higher poster value than you without even doing the math.[greentext]>The important thing is that I have a poster value of 5.9 which is in fact less than 6.7 which makes me the superior poster even if we are using your *magical* solution.[/greentext]
In that case you aren't applying the formula that places me at 6.7 to yourself, where it places you at 11.3
No sir I will not apply your formula that place you at 6.7 as it dishonestly depreciates your number. If you read my above post your true number compared to mine is 8.21 with my number being in the 3.somethings. My mathematics and method are clearly of higher value than yours as I bring into account the number of posts and thanks in the same timeframe rather than doing a low value song and dance that incorporates "post frequency". Its sad to see you resort to such low value methods in an attempt to interlope into the high value class to which I belong.[greentext]>In the same amount of time you have gathered 61 likes over more than 500 posts.[/greentext]
But again,this is not relevant, refer to tenet 2. The amount of nolifing and effort spent on totse derivatives is an essential modifier of ability. There is fluid intelligence and crystallized intelligence. Crystallized intelligence is something that can be learned, and acquired through nolifing a high posts per day ratio. Fluid intelligence is innate, and reflects the δ of a poster in the purest form. If I nolifed as hard as you did, my returns would be far greater.
Literally pseudoscience. Kill yourself for believing in crystal intelligence. That shit is as quack as crystal energy and psycic readings. If you want to use bad math, bad numbers and bad karma then thats fine. But do not attempt to pass your drivel off as anything other than utter, unsubstantiated, low value nonsense. -
2016-03-14 at 10:37 AM UTC in A contest: What am I afraid of most?Your biggest fear is quite obviously someone actually caring for you and subsequently genuinely caring for them. Human affection terrifies and confuses you so you do things like breathe rape chicks so they grow to hate you.
-
2016-03-14 at 10:20 AM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?
Sorry m8. U got RIPPED fair and square. -
2016-03-14 at 10:17 AM UTC in ATT: Crazy Mike and/or Sophie
everyone in this thread needs to cool it
[greentext]>listening to Bill Krozby[/greentext]
[greentext]>ever[/greentext]
-
2016-03-14 at 10:15 AM UTC in Nig Ops I Nigs@Nite EditionFuck if we got a tunneling thread going that would be real dope.
Unfortunately I have little experience in outdoor shelter. I constructed grain bins for a summer but I feel that this is not the same as you are thinking. Me and by buddy were gonna build a winery (just planned fencing a shed) but we only got like 4 posts in the ground before saying "fuckit lets smoke weed".
I would like to make a small shack somewhere real remote like. Just a little place to chill and hang my hat. Maybe if EasyDoesIt sees this thread he will give us some tips on cabin building. Though its unlikely because he is mad that I as a dick to him in his survival gear thread. -
2016-03-14 at 10:05 AM UTC in Find out the truth about drugs at drugfreeworld.orgThat ad... With a haircut like that they are lucky he is just droppin some acid and isnt shooting up schools. He was fucked before he even took the drugs I tell ya.
These anti-drug campaigns are all the same "Think of the children! You can get hooked on acid in just one hit! The war on drugs is a noble effort! Now please give us more tax money to combat this by arming the mexican drug cartels!" Its all the same crock of shit rehashed to keep america fighting a war on what literally boils down to chemicals. Its an easy path to a police state ill tell ya that and its the people who need help the most who are simply locked away in a federal facility.
If people knew the truth.
The whole truth.
About drugs.
like maybe all the wars and shit would stop.
And we could live in like
harmony
and shit. -
2016-03-14 at 9:48 AM UTC in What's your thank: post ratio?post.