User Controls
Canadia seems really big
-
2019-11-25 at 5:47 AM UTCBenny mad that I make mistakes speaking my third language
When he can't even speak one -
2019-11-25 at 6:02 AM UTC
-
2019-11-25 at 6:03 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace *汉字
Those are the kind of mistakes people make when they actually, you know, speak Chinese and use a Chinese keyboard to do it.
汉子 literally just means man, but I guess whatever translator you used didn't separate it correctly and took the 汉 and the 子 separately.
汉字 is the characters. Maybe your translator will get that one correct.
Never mind that they're pronounced the exact same with the same tones and everything.
this is hanji : 漢.
this is communist-ji : 汉. -
2019-11-25 at 6:45 AM UTCThat's just han. Not hanzi. Definitely not han"ji"
And again, no country uses wade giles. You are over half a century late to the party. Not that you even know wade giles, you seem to hip hop around random and non-existent systems because 'romanization doesn't matter'.
Yet, you don't use Chinese either so???
Yep. Fake Chinese. Confirmed yet again.
/discussion -
2019-11-25 at 10:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace That's just han. Not hanzi. Definitely not han"ji"
And again, no country uses wade giles. You are over half a century late to the party. Not that you even know wade giles, you seem to hip hop around random and non-existent systems because 'romanization doesn't matter'.
Yet, you don't use Chinese either so???
Yep. Fake Chinese. Confirmed yet again.
/discussion
no you stupid, inferior, low IQ spic.
i posted one 'hun' in its original hanji and another 'hun' in its communisted, communist
ji.
pls just lay off of my language since you obviously dont have enough hardware processing power to process it.
stick with your espicada. -
2019-11-25 at 12:33 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny american and nato funded.
Oh you plonker benntHarrier Jump Jet
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
For the video game, see Harrier Jump Jet (video game).
Harrier Jump Jet
Spanish EAV-8B Harrier II+ "Cobra" (27448607244) (cropped).jpg
A Harrier II in hover with downward jet exhaust
Role V/STOL strike aircraft
National origin United Kingdom
Manufacturer Hawker Siddeley
British Aerospace / McDonnell Douglas
Boeing / BAE Systems
First flight 28 December 1967
Introduction 1969
Status In service
Primary users United States Marine Corps
Royal Air Force (retired)
Royal Navy (retired)
Indian Navy (retired)
Produced 1967–2003
Developed from Hawker P.1127
Variants Hawker Siddeley Harrier
British Aerospace Sea Harrier
McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II
British Aerospace Harrier II
The Harrier, informally referred to as the Harrier Jump Jet, is a family of jet-powered attack aircraft capable of vertical/short takeoff and landing operations (V/STOL). Named after a bird of prey,[1] it was originally developed by British manufacturer Hawker Siddeley in the 1960s. The Harrier emerged as the only truly successful V/STOL design of the many attempted during that era, despite being a subsonic aircraft, unlike most of its competitors. It was conceived to operate from improvised bases, such as car parks or forest clearings, without requiring large and vulnerable air bases. Later, the design was adapted for use from aircraft carriers.
There are two generations and four main variants of the Harrier family, developed by both UK and US manufacturers:
Hawker Siddeley Harrier
-British Aerospace Sea Harrier
McDonnell Douglas AV-8B Harrier II
-British Aerospace Harrier II
The Hawker Siddeley Harrier is the first generation-version and is also known as the AV-8A Harrier; it was used by multiple air forces, including the Royal Air Force (RAF) and the United States Marine Corps (USMC). The Sea Harrier is a naval strike/air defence fighter derived from the Hawker Siddeley Harrier; it was operated by both the Royal Navy and the Indian Navy. During the 1980s, a second generation Harrier emerged; manufactured in the United States as the AV-8B and in Britain as the British Aerospace Harrier II respectively. By the start of the 21st century, the majority of the first generation Harriers had been withdrawn, many operators having chosen to procure the second generation as a replacement. In the long term, several operators have announced their intention to supplement or replace their Harrier fleets with the STOVL variant of the F-35 Lightning II, designated as the F-35B.
It was British intellect that conceived the idea. That's what counts. But I guess expecting a moron to understand such a thing is a bit too much to ask, lol.
What a Plonker
. -
2019-11-25 at 12:39 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny that was an exploratory phase ?
It was a tactical retreat bennt, all forces make them, its how war goes.
What was the final outcome of that war bennt? tell us all again.
and what was the final outcome of china's "tactical" retreat into Taiwan, again?
come on bennt tell us, we'd all love to hear.
. -
2019-11-25 at 1:04 PM UTCplonker
-
2019-11-25 at 2:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny no you stupid, inferior, low IQ spic.
i posted one 'hun' in its original hanji and another 'hun' in its communisted, communist
ji.
pls just lay off of my language since you obviously dont have enough hardware processing power to process it.
stick with your espicada.
You are tremendously stupid and I can tell at a glance you speak literally no Chinese.
Use pinyin, the universal standard. Or bopomofo. Nobody uses... Whatever the fuck that is. -
2019-11-25 at 3:21 PM UTCYare bennt's reelie doopid, innie §m£ÂgØL?
. -
2019-11-25 at 3:50 PM UTCAll non Canadians should kill themselves
The world would be a better place -
2019-11-25 at 3:52 PM UTC
-
2019-11-25 at 7:12 PM UTC
-
2019-11-25 at 7:15 PM UTC
Originally posted by Narc It was a tactical retreat bennt, all forces make them, its how war goes.
What was the final outcome of that war bennt? tell us all again.
and what was the final outcome of china's "tactical" retreat into Taiwan, again?
come on bennt tell us, we'd all love to hear.
.
americans saved you after the your military tactically lost to the germans due to tactical cowardice.
like i said, that was chinese invasion of taiwan, not a retreat. -
2019-11-25 at 7:17 PM UTC
-
2019-11-25 at 8:46 PM UTC
-
2019-11-25 at 8:47 PM UTC
-
2019-11-25 at 10:04 PM UTC
-
2019-11-25 at 10:09 PM UTC
-
2019-11-25 at 10:40 PM UTCCanadians took the bulk of the German barrage on D-Day, and still successfully breached their defenses, while Americans took a flanking position.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
