2021-04-30 at 1:56 PM UTC
God does not fuck with the world he just lets it do it's own thing
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2021-04-30 at 2:21 PM UTC
I win this thread. GG ez.
2021-04-30 at 6:12 PM UTC
I'll put some crema in your coffeehole
2021-04-30 at 8:08 PM UTC
The best argument for the concept of God is to imagine if everyone in the world could be a God to their very own earth. Just as a little play thing. Experiment. Almost like a dream.
If you could fantasize anything and then also have it happen, but it's a dream, does it count? Did it really happen?
If you punch an old lady in the face repeatedly until she dies, while she sobs and begs for you to stop, screaming and crying with all her might, experiencing the pain, but you're just dreaming, then does it even matter? Does her pain matter?
Lol.
2021-04-30 at 8:09 PM UTC
Originally posted by mmQ
The best argument for the concept of God is to imagine if everyone in the world could be a God to their very own earth. Just as a little play thing. Experiment. Almost like a dream.
If you could fantasize anything and then also have it happen, but it's a dream, does it count? Did it really happen?
If you punch an old lady in the face repeatedly until she dies, while she sobs and begs for you to stop, screaming and crying with all her might, experiencing the pain, but you're just dreaming, then does it even matter? Does her pain matter?
Lol.
Simulation hypothesis basically
Originally posted by Chairman Takeshi Kaga
The simulation hypothesis holds that in a universe where ancestor simulations can happen as a result of intentional actions, the overwhelming likelihood is that they will happen at least once somewhere, and that in a universe where it happens at least once, the amount of simulated conscious observers in a particular reference class will vastly outnumber the number of unsimulated observers to the point where the relative chance of any given observer being unsimulated will be virtually zero.
According to the most modern state of neuroscience, human consciousness seems to be the result of physical processes involving our brain and thus seems to be simulatable within our own universe.
Thus the chances that any particular observer in our reference class (including you and I) are simulated are overwhelming. Thus the chances are that we exist within one of a massive number of ancestor simulations.
These simulations, being the results of intentional actions, would be controlled by some entity that is capable of conscious comprehension. This entity would have total control and perfect information of every aspect of our reality.
They could move stars around your sky at will to form pictures. They could return the save file of your dead loved ones and remove their cancerous organ with the save file of a healthy organ. They could give you superpowers or perform miracles. They could make reality retrospectively change to reflect and "rationalize" all their actions, including our memories, so it always seems to be consistent with natural phenomena.
Such a person would be fit to be called god and as demonstrated above, is likely to be existent relative to our reality.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2021-04-30 at 8:13 PM UTC
Fuck yeah. I'm learning today.
Pettifog.
Simulation hypothesis.
I like that. Thats exactly what I mean. The odds of all this could be one in a zillion billion but that doesn't make it any less likely that we are still a product of something, like a penny from a billionaire still is a penny.
