User Controls
Posts by -SpectraL
-
2019-08-05 at 5:36 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny the basic tenets of terrorism is to attack the most innocent for best effect.
if you kill a bunch of drug dealers they probably deserve it and people would cheer even.
thats why baslan happened.
But these aren't drug dealers, and nobody would cheer on the shooting of children. -
2019-08-05 at 5:27 PM UTC in Funny thing about mass shootingsWiki is a creation of the CIA, in partnership with intelligence agencies from around the world. Same with Facebook, Google, YouTube, Twitter, SnapChat, all of them. They set these up, set up the "Faces" to represent them, then they drain them and record them and document them and archive them for tactical information. Everything you've been told is a lie. Everything you see is a lie. We are now living inside a giant lie.
-
2019-08-05 at 5:23 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
-
2019-08-05 at 4:52 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
-
2019-08-05 at 4:46 PM UTC in 8chan shoah'd by cloudflare
Originally posted by Sudo https://news.bitcoin.com/uk-police-force-investigates-the-defunct-mintpal-exchange-and-owner/
when this was being hacked, cloudflare acted like it was being ddos'd and couldn't do shit meanwhile it was a fake page to make it look like a hack when it was internal
Yep. That's what they do. They rip off their own customers while staging fake hacks. Even the cops themselves steal when they investigate these places for stealing. -
2019-08-05 at 4:43 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Less security..softer easier target than a republican convention, also schools are readily available and close by. Makes perfect sense.
Why not a Republican picnic or something then? That's got to be pretty soft? But, no, they go shoot up a crowd from a Las Vegas hotel room upper window, with security and police crawling all over the place. -
2019-08-05 at 4:40 PM UTC in Funny thing about mass shootings
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Circular references are such a clever hack of the system. And all it is is a few hundred jedis at various different colleges citing each other back and forth without any reference to any primary evidence. And it actually works.
And they don't even use permanent sources. Many, many of their so-called "credible sources" are linked to sources that no longer even exist on the Internet and have no backups/archive. And when you try and delete the statement they based their now non-existent "credible source" on, they reinstate the statement and leave the dead link there at the same time. They'll keep doing it again and again, too, on the same page. Very, very persistent radical leftists. But that's what makes them fun, you know? -
2019-08-05 at 4:34 PM UTC in Funny thing about mass shootings
-
2019-08-05 at 4:33 PM UTC in What is your opinion of social justice warriors in general?
-
2019-08-05 at 4:31 PM UTC in Funny thing about mass shootings
Originally posted by Jυicebox I have literally never seen a page where this would work
IME they're all so chock full of circular references that they can just say "lol, you have one source, we have fifty, and all of ours agree. Begone, goyim!"
Then you're shadowbanned.
Anyone can edit any Wikipedia page at any time. It's an open-based platform. -
2019-08-05 at 4:29 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson What makes you think that's the thought process at work and reasoning behind it versus the dude just being a fucking worthless nut who knows his only way to "fame" is to do something shitty?
These young tits are so fucking weak they see a mass shooting and the attention the shooters get (both positive and negative) they want to "live forever" via history rather than die alone of a heart attack at age 51 in their 87yr old mothers basement.
It's the old "go out in a blaze of glory or fade away" dilemma, of course they are too cowardly (or physical failures) to actually sign up to the army or something where they might actually face someone that will shoot back.
So yep, churches, schools, malls…soft easy targets that will cause the most outrage and so get their names in the international news and earning them a place in history.
That's it. Conspiracy not required.
But a radical leftist who hates Trump and the Republicans would still get the exact same national attention if he shot up, say, a Republican convention, or a Republican headquarters, or a Republican picnic. Why a school? Or a bar? Or a church, where there are Democrats as well? It doesn't make sense! -
2019-08-05 at 4:24 PM UTC in Funny thing about mass shootings
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country It's very hard to do anything to improve the slant on wikipedia because you will literally get mobbed by infinite numbers of insane jedis and lefty college students. It's just not worth even trying.
Whenever I read one of their pages that goes way over the line of credibility and is full of unproven and un-cited and un-sourced leftist claims, I edit it right at the top of the page with: [PLEASE NOTE: THIS PAGE IS CHALK FULL OF RADICAL LEFTIST OPINIONS AND CONTAINS NUMEROUS UN-CREDIBLE SOURCES]. Then some radical leftist doof deletes the edit, so I wait a few days and then go back in and re-add the line at the top with an explanation for the deletion. Then I wait a few more days and do it again. Open platform. Factual public edits are permitted. At least they have to work for their liberal propaganda bullshit. -
2019-08-05 at 4:16 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Well jeez that's simple, they are soft targets and will make the news…these betas want to be someone..that's the only way they can someone…by doing a cowardly act.
Let's say you hated Trump and you hated the Republicans, and you even wrote that online. Would your first thought be to go shoot up a school of Democrat children, or a gay bar full of Democrat party-goers, or a college full of Democrat socialists? Makes no sense! -
2019-08-05 at 4:12 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by Jυicebox Anyone that enters my home without permission will be cleaning my blood from their crevices and orifices for weeks
But the feds come in as SWAT, with a no-knock warrant, full-body shields, battering ram, full metal armor, flanking firepower, face shields, infrared and smoke/concussion grenades. Nobody can withstand that. You wouldn't have a chance, even if you were fully armed. -
2019-08-05 at 4:05 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Homework lol…reading conspiracy nut sites and believing it.
Again if the US gov (or any gov) had wanted there to be WMDs…there would have been WMDs…
If you refuse to consider anything else, consider this:
If a person is so enraged against the system, the government, the police, etc, why would they go shoot up a school of defenseless kids, or a church of Christian worshipers, or a mall of random people? Let's say you hated the government with a passion. Would the first thought in your head be to go shoot up a nightclub? Let's say you hated the system and the powers that be. Would your first thought be to go shoot up a school of defenseless children? It doesn't make sense! And yet here we have dozens and dozens of this very situation playing out in front of us time after time after time. The so-called manifestos point specifically to a hatred of the system, and yet it's not the system being attacked, it's the public being attacked. It doesn't make sense! But it DOES make perfect sense, if you look at it from the angle that the real attackers are not part of the public, but are, in fact, part of the system: the government itself. The real attackers aren't going to attack themselves! What's that old saying that the most likely scenario is probably the right one? Occam's Razor, or something like that? -
2019-08-05 at 3:56 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by Jυicebox If "behind bars" means in a mass grave maybe
I would highly advise against making any such statements online: to the effect you wish someone dead, or even desire to incite someone else to see someone dead. The feds can easily, and I mean easily, turn around and use that single statement against you and raid your home at 4:30am and seize all your equipment and throw you in a solitary confinement cell to sweat it out and see what you know. Then they can lay felony charges on you and destroy your life, if they want, or even if they just don't like your face. Although their philosophy is quite true, that might makes right, you wouldn't want to expose your position online here or places like this. Believe it or not, they congregate in places such as this, looking for easy targets to fill their quotas and get more fodder for their gigantic funding. I mean, if you're getting 500 billion dollars a year from the taxpayer, you have to have something to show for it, right? You'll do! And they make sure you can't come back to snitch them out either. You just.. disappear into the nether. Never reveal your positions to these freaks of nature, that's my best advice. -
2019-08-05 at 3:24 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson That's what the non-mainstream media want you to believe, you fell for it.
No, the unbiased envoy was sent in by the US government itself, and the fakestream media fully reported on it. The only real problem here is you haven't done your homework at all, and yet you're here to pontify on how much you know about the subject, which is basically nothing. I like you, JJ, but you're just plain wrong on this. Stop buying into the fake news/deep state narrative. They don't care about you. They couldn't care less if you dropped dead tomorrow. Stop trying to front for them. They're all going to down the shit chute soon. It's not like they are going to be the proud winners of anything at all. The only thing they're going to be is behind bars, where they belong. -
2019-08-05 at 3:20 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by Jυicebox Let's not forget that the Bush family often stayed with the bin Laden family while they were working out oil deals in the 1980s, or that the "Syrian Observatory on Human Rights" is just some britbong in a Manchester apartment
Bin Laden was actually one their guys, a CIA intelligence operative working abroad. When it came time, they used him as the patsy, faked/staged a "capture", then cooked up the "burial at sea" ploy so they wouldn't have to produce a body. Bin Laden was never captured, and he had already died long before 9/11. The 9/11 tapes they plastered on the fakestream media networks were also forged fakes. Shit, even Jeff Epstien is a Mossad intelligence operative. That's why they had to let him go the first time. I'll bet you dollars to donuts he won't be living too, too long either, not with the British Prince involved now. -
2019-08-05 at 3:14 PM UTC in Ohio shooting
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson (even thought they did in fact find some chemical weapons which are classed as WMDs)
No, they did not find chemical weapons. Anybody who was actually following the thread of that false flag operation knows that a neutral and unbiased envoy was sent into Iraq and given free reign to examine all and everything, approved by Saddam himself, and after weeks of careful local investigation, not a thing was found, except an old rotted out truck in the desert, which contained some noxious materials. So, no, there were no chemical weapons found at all; that is yet another fakestream media lie you just went ahead and bought. -
2019-08-05 at 3:09 PM UTC in Ohio shootingAt this point, that anyone believes ANY official story is a sure sign of severe mental illness and a willful and deliberate desire to bury their head in the sand and wish it all away.
