User Controls

Ohio shooting

  1. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country

    Anyone remember Osama's Mountain fortress?

    On the right is his real (supposed) house.

    whenever I see these diagrams I assume they're commissioned by companies that sell bunker penetrator missiles and stuff like that
  2. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson (even thought they did in fact find some chemical weapons which are classed as WMDs)

    No, they did not find chemical weapons. Anybody who was actually following the thread of that false flag operation knows that a neutral and unbiased envoy was sent into Iraq and given free reign to examine all and everything, approved by Saddam himself, and after weeks of careful local investigation, not a thing was found, except an old rotted out truck in the desert, which contained some noxious materials. So, no, there were no chemical weapons found at all; that is yet another fakestream media lie you just went ahead and bought.
  3. Originally posted by -SpectraL No, they did not find chemical weapons. Anybody who was actually following the thread of that false flag operation knows that a neutral and unbiased envoy was sent into Iraq and given free reign to examine all and everything, approved by Saddam himself, and after weeks of careful local investigation, not a thing was found, except an old rotted out truck in the desert, which contained some noxious materials. So, no, there were no chemical weapons found at all; that is yet another fakestream media lie you just went ahead and bought.

    That's what the non-mainstream media want you to believe, you fell for it.
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jυicebox Let's not forget that the Bush family often stayed with the bin Laden family while they were working out oil deals in the 1980s, or that the "Syrian Observatory on Human Rights" is just some britbong in a Manchester apartment

    Bin Laden was actually one their guys, a CIA intelligence operative working abroad. When it came time, they used him as the patsy, faked/staged a "capture", then cooked up the "burial at sea" ploy so they wouldn't have to produce a body. Bin Laden was never captured, and he had already died long before 9/11. The 9/11 tapes they plastered on the fakestream media networks were also forged fakes. Shit, even Jeff Epstien is a Mossad intelligence operative. That's why they had to let him go the first time. I'll bet you dollars to donuts he won't be living too, too long either, not with the British Prince involved now.
  5. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Dark Matter [my scoffingly uncritical tinning]
    Anyone remember "Saddam could hit London" bullshit?


    https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-139703/Just-45-minutes-attack.html
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/northamerica/usa/1406638/Saddam-weapons-are-a-very-real-threat-to-Britain-warns-Tony-Blair.html

    Thank Yahweh our PNAC friends in Tel Aviv warned us in time.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. And people wonder why nobody trusts the US government
  7. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson That's what the non-mainstream media want you to believe, you fell for it.

    No, the unbiased envoy was sent in by the US government itself, and the fakestream media fully reported on it. The only real problem here is you haven't done your homework at all, and yet you're here to pontify on how much you know about the subject, which is basically nothing. I like you, JJ, but you're just plain wrong on this. Stop buying into the fake news/deep state narrative. They don't care about you. They couldn't care less if you dropped dead tomorrow. Stop trying to front for them. They're all going to down the shit chute soon. It's not like they are going to be the proud winners of anything at all. The only thing they're going to be is behind bars, where they belong.
  8. Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Dark Matter [my scoffingly uncritical tinning]
    Some people will shill for TPTB, no matter who TPTB are. And I understand that. They'd do the same thing no matter who was in charge.
  9. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    people crave status and will often do whatever they can to get it

    ***yes, there is a hint of irony in this statement
  10. Originally posted by -SpectraL No, the unbiased envoy was sent in by the US government itself, and the fakestream media fully reported on it. The only real problem here is you haven't done your homework at all, and yet you're here to pontify on how much you know about the subject, which is basically nothing. I like you, JJ, but you're just plain wrong on this. Stop buying into the fake news/deep state narrative. They don't care about you. They couldn't care less if you dropped dead tomorrow. Stop trying to front for them. They're all going to down the shit chute soon. It's not like they are going to be the proud winners of anything at all. The only thing they're going to be is behind bars, where they belong.

    Homework lol...reading conspiracy nut sites and believing it.

    Again if the US gov (or any gov) had wanted there to be WMDs...there would have been WMDs...
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. kroz weak whyte, frothy cuck, and former twink
    Originally posted by Japan-Is-Eternal WHAT THE JEWS WANT

    - No right to self-preservation for your race and soil
    - No right to self-defense with firearms
    - Restricted speech and expression
    - No rights to your own children (if the kikes want to turn your son into a tranny you have no right to protect him)
    - No more countries
    - One racially homogeneous shit brown race of subhuman trash that will be easily ruled over (Kalergi plan)

    Killing the people behind these anti-nationalist and anti-white movements should be the top priority.
    Murdering random civilians won't bring about any good change for patriots, we should be killing the CEOs, heads of intelligence agencies and military, NGOs etc who are directly responsible for the decline and eventual death of our people and nations.

    you know kalergi was eurasian right?
  12. Originally posted by -SpectraL No, the unbiased envoy was sent in by the US government itself, and the fakestream media fully reported on it. The only real problem here is you haven't done your homework at all, and yet you're here to pontify on how much you know about the subject, which is basically nothing. I like you, JJ, but you're just plain wrong on this. Stop buying into the fake news/deep state narrative. They don't care about you. They couldn't care less if you dropped dead tomorrow. Stop trying to front for them. They're all going to down the shit chute soon. It's not like they are going to be the proud winners of anything at all. The only thing they're going to be is behind bars, where they belong.

    If "behind bars" means in a mass grave maybe
  13. And stop falling for retarded trolling will you?

    Please?
  14. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Originally posted by aldra that doesn't explain the suppression of the other, better-supported viewpoints though. if it were truly a 'marketplace of ideas' as it's often claimed and as you insinuated earlier, it'd benefit a news outlet to go against the grain and prove all the others wrong - in many areas like those listed above though, it simply does not happen. the smaller outlets that do are reviled and their integrity is constantly attacked, with Assange being the extreme case of someone literally being imprisoned for decades for doing the job of an investigative journalist.

    You are still not hearing what I'm saying. I'm not saying media outlets have no agenda and are fully devoted to the honest dissemination of unbiased information for the benefit of the public.

    There is no "free marketplace of ideas" in media, if you think that is even happening on the internet then you are incredibly naive and simply swallowed the marketing from the next group of hucksters who want your eyeballs for YouTube ad revenue. You really think the Daily Stormer is giving you a bias free factual report?

    News outlets are also trying to push an agenda. But it's their own agenda and that's what you're seeing rather than some directed government or jéw propaganda effort. Their agenda is money. Not what idea is the best but how does our brand want to draw attention, and what angle they are taking.

    If I am Fox News, I have a viewer profile I want to appeal to. I want people to post clips of Hannity on Facebook to own their libtard aunt, I want them to want my stats as if I'm their verifying factor.

    The current state of American news media is an emergent one from many agents making decisions locally, not one agent making a decision globally.

    Look, American news will always have a white house flavour, that is going to be true for any country with legit outlets, the government is their direct line to what's going on out of public view. For example with the Crimea referendum, you will usually only either see lies of omission or direct quotes from US officials without a judgement either way, which is how they trim a narrative. "US official said X", but no mention of contradictory claims from credible international bodies for example.

    To you it seems like a directed effort, but to me I just see how similar the news outlets' process pipelines are: "Crimea has an election and it goes smoothly" isn't the story, the story is "CIA SAYS CRIMEA ELECTION RIGGED" with the pictures and quote you got firsthand from an official at a podium with an eagle on it.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  15. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jυicebox If "behind bars" means in a mass grave maybe

    I would highly advise against making any such statements online: to the effect you wish someone dead, or even desire to incite someone else to see someone dead. The feds can easily, and I mean easily, turn around and use that single statement against you and raid your home at 4:30am and seize all your equipment and throw you in a solitary confinement cell to sweat it out and see what you know. Then they can lay felony charges on you and destroy your life, if they want, or even if they just don't like your face. Although their philosophy is quite true, that might makes right, you wouldn't want to expose your position online here or places like this. Believe it or not, they congregate in places such as this, looking for easy targets to fill their quotas and get more fodder for their gigantic funding. I mean, if you're getting 500 billion dollars a year from the taxpayer, you have to have something to show for it, right? You'll do! And they make sure you can't come back to snitch them out either. You just.. disappear into the nether. Never reveal your positions to these freaks of nature, that's my best advice.
  16. Common De-mominator African Astronaut
    Like, the media is the media. You can explain 99% of this stuff as American media doing its thing, jumping on half assed scoops because it's easier to apologize, treating white house information packets like Word of God.

    If you see how similar their process pipeline is, it's no wonder that there are particular narrative cycles and focuses, they're all working off similar information in similar ways.

    90% of what big news outlets do anyway is enhancement Reuters' newswire for their particular target audience.
  17. Originally posted by -SpectraL I would highly advise against making any such statements online: to the effect you wish someone dead, or even desire to incite someone else to see someone dead. The feds can easily, and I mean easily, turn around and use that single statement against you and raid your home at 4:30am and seize all your equipment and throw you in a solitary confinement cell to sweat it out and see what you know. Then they can lay felony charges on you and destroy your life, if they want, or even if they just don't like your face. Although their philosophy is quite true, that might makes right, you wouldn't want to expose your position online here or places like this. Believe it or not, they congregate in places such as this, looking for easy targets to fill their quotas and get more fodder for their gigantic funding. I mean, if you're getting 500 billion dollars a year from the taxpayer, you have to have something to show for it, right? You'll do! And they make sure you can't come back to snitch them out either. You just.. disappear into the nether. Never reveal your positions to these freaks of nature, that's my best advice.

    Anyone that enters my home without permission will be cleaning my blood from their crevices and orifices for weeks
  18. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Homework lol…reading conspiracy nut sites and believing it.

    Again if the US gov (or any gov) had wanted there to be WMDs…there would have been WMDs…

    If you refuse to consider anything else, consider this:

    If a person is so enraged against the system, the government, the police, etc, why would they go shoot up a school of defenseless kids, or a church of Christian worshipers, or a mall of random people? Let's say you hated the government with a passion. Would the first thought in your head be to go shoot up a nightclub? Let's say you hated the system and the powers that be. Would your first thought be to go shoot up a school of defenseless children? It doesn't make sense! And yet here we have dozens and dozens of this very situation playing out in front of us time after time after time. The so-called manifestos point specifically to a hatred of the system, and yet it's not the system being attacked, it's the public being attacked. It doesn't make sense! But it DOES make perfect sense, if you look at it from the angle that the real attackers are not part of the public, but are, in fact, part of the system: the government itself. The real attackers aren't going to attack themselves! What's that old saying that the most likely scenario is probably the right one? Occam's Razor, or something like that?
  19. Originally posted by -SpectraL If a person is so enraged against the system, the government, the police, etc, why would they go shoot up a school of defenseless kids, or a church of Christian worshipers, or a mall of random people?

    Well jeez that's simple, they are soft targets and will make the news...these betas want to be someone..that's the only way they can someone...by doing a cowardly act.
  20. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Jυicebox Anyone that enters my home without permission will be cleaning my blood from their crevices and orifices for weeks

    But the feds come in as SWAT, with a no-knock warrant, full-body shields, battering ram, full metal armor, flanking firepower, face shields, infrared and smoke/concussion grenades. Nobody can withstand that. You wouldn't have a chance, even if you were fully armed.
Jump to Top