User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by gadzooks
-
2020-10-22 at 12:54 AM UTC in OnlyFans bitches really think there is no shame in what they're doingunless it's a burly amazon sticking her fingers inThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-21 at 11:05 PM UTC in Deleted posts for: Billy teh Block HeadFindom sounds like getting sexually dominated by an aquatic sea creature
-
2020-10-21 at 10:52 PM UTC in OnlyFans bitches really think there is no shame in what they're doingThe findom industry is a fucked up world and I don’t care what anybody says lol
Niggas goin bankrupt, gettin blackmailed, and buyin doo doo just to cum -
2020-10-21 at 9:58 PM UTC in Lanny + fralaThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-21 at 9:51 PM UTC in Lanny + frala
Originally posted by Bugz No no no, dear. You were drunk and triggered. You had 0 F*ILTER going on that night
That’s my normal state nigger. How many times do I have to tell you? Goddamn.
Originally posted by Indiana-Is-Eternal I'm far better off than you.
You're an old hag with saggy tits that dates lanny of all people.
You look like an old kike that writes for jezebel and calls for white genocide on Twitter.
And?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-21 at 9:23 PM UTC in Lanny + fralaI may or may not have pushed him over in his chair
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-21 at 8:53 PM UTC in Steve Jobs is responsible for #BLMYes I know this is just a joke thread and I shouldn't be making serious comments but FUCK YOU IVE HAD A HARD WEEK
-
2020-10-21 at 8:27 PM UTC in Deleted posts for: Billy teh Block HeadThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-21 at 7:54 PM UTC in OnlyFans bitches really think there is no shame in what they're doingedited for privacyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-21 at 7:52 PM UTC in Sasha (((Cohen))) aka Borat guilty of entrapment. Tricks Rudy Guliani in framing attempt.
Originally posted by gadzooks Not gonna lie, this is actually pretty significant for a run of the mill movie stunt.
Is the scene in the actual Borat sequel movie?
Has it officially been released yet?
I actually really wanna see it.
The original one was a pretty significant piece of pop culture.
It comes out this Friday on Amazon Prime I think.
this is an actual scene.
Fucking fantastic. Borat is a master troll. I was worried he wouldn't go far enough this time but damn has he done it, and I haven't even watched it yet.
Amazon gave away a month of Prime for free for Prime day too. So there are A LOT of people who will be able to watch this for free. Cohen is such a brilliant marketer.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-21 at 7:21 PM UTC in Who Do You Predict As Tomorrow Night's Debate Winner?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-21 at 5:47 PM UTC in Deleted posts for: Billy teh Block Head
-
2020-10-21 at 3:25 PM UTC in OnlyFans bitches really think there is no shame in what they're doingE-thottery is only bad when it relies on exploiting the psychology behind parasocial relationships to extract money from people's wallets. That said, basically every twitch streamer (both sexes) is guilty of this. I don't see it as necessarily being any worse when the parasocial relationship involves sexuality like with onlyfans. It's all horribly exploitative of sad dudes craving a meaningful social connection.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-21 at 1:18 PM UTC in OnlyFans bitches really think there is no shame in what they're doingThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-21 at 11:44 AM UTC in Eugenically desirable traits in a womanThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-21 at 9:41 AM UTC in Fona © 10-21-2020The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-21 at 9:33 AM UTC in Fona © 10-21-2020ur gonna have a great day.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-20 at 1:21 AM UTC in Are you ready for the FACTCHECKING?Penis length always rounds up to the nearest meterThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-10-20 at 1:20 AM UTC in Are you ready for the FACTCHECKING?
Originally posted by gadzooks It's still reasonable to put a certain degree of trust into the scientific knowledge base just on the face of it.
It's about putting trust in the integrity of other scientists within the community who act as peer review or in some other relevant capacity.
Yes, having faith in science is usually a safe bet.
Originally posted by gadzooks There's a reason that false science is always ultimately uprooted.
That's mighty optimistic and idealistic of you, and doesn't seem like the kind of thing you can really prove is true. It's kind of a tautological line of reasoning - it's more accurate to say that when false science is discovered it is uprooted. Eventually. Usually.
Originally posted by gadzooks Once somebody publishes a research study, the entire community of that particular field will be scrutinizing it (first during peer review, and then afterwards by others).
Peer review panels consist of a tiny fraction of the field, and the only people interested in any given study are going to be people to whose own research it is relevant.
Originally posted by gadzooks Then other scientists try to replicate the study.
Ideally, eventually this happens yes.
Originally posted by gadzooks If they can't replicate the same results, shit hits the fan.
If one study fails to replicate something that is accepted as dogma within a given field, it's going to take more than that for shit to hit the proverbial fan. At that point you've got 1 point for and 1 point against.
Originally posted by gadzooks To distrust scientific knowledge is equivalent to positing a conspiracy theory.
To distrust something is not the same as positing a completely alternate, unfounded theory. Simply saying "I don't trust that" is not equivalent to saying "actually this is true instead, it was revealed to me in a dream sent by fucking liserd men".The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2020-10-20 at 12:23 AM UTC in Are you ready for the FACTCHECKING?
lulzar
the entire point of reforming math like this appears to be to make the methods and answers less objective so that you're not just either 'right' or 'wrong' and that points can be awarded for attempts.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
