User Controls
Posts by gadzooks
-
2019-03-07 at 5:42 AM UTC in BDSMToo much liquor and xanax.
FUCK. -
2019-03-07 at 5:42 AM UTC in BDSMHOLY FUCK WRONG FORUM.
LMAO. -
2019-03-07 at 5:42 AM UTC in Muh xanniez
Originally posted by GGG That is sweet. I get a similar deduction for my tuition. Cool that you're gonna get it from years past though.
FUK the paperwork though.
The funny thing is that, even though I finished my post-secondary schooling over 5 years ago, I am ONLY NOW getting around to filing for it.
I hate the paperwork too, man.
But when I actually realized how much I could get back... I just had to force myself to do it. -
2019-03-07 at 5:39 AM UTC in BDSMSo where do you all find yourselves on the "spectrum".
No, not that spectrum.
I mean in terms of BDSM.
I, personally, contend that literally everyone lies SOMEWHERE on this spectrum.
There might be some wackjob religious fundamentalists who only engage in sex for the purpose of procreation, and engage in the missionary position night after night. But secretly, they yearn for more.
So where do you fit?
I have very strong submissive tendencies (in the bedroom, at least). Just about anything short of scat or pegging turn me on.
I'm not saying it's ideal, or right, or wrong, or anything. ITT we just talk kink, no value judgments. -
2019-03-07 at 5:26 AM UTC in Muh xanniez
Originally posted by GGG I still have to do mine. I have a lot of different sources of income this year so they're going to be annoying.
I generally don't much care for filing my taxes, but I discovered that I have a whole bunch of carryover deductions from years ago when I was in school (paying tuition, etc) with nearly zero income.
Apparently I get to use them shits now that I have income.
It's pretty sweet. -
2019-03-07 at 5:23 AM UTC in Muh xanniezONLY TWO AND HALF HOURS UNIL TAX RETURN DEPOST...
I think.
I don't know if gubment does midnight deposit or during business hours. -
2019-03-07 at 5:19 AM UTC in In this thread we post pics of ourselves
-
2019-03-07 at 5:15 AM UTC in In this thread we post pics of ourselves
-
2019-03-07 at 5:14 AM UTC in Influx of incest pornOK THIS THREAD IS TOO MUCH.
SHUT IT ALL DOWN. -
2019-03-07 at 5:11 AM UTC in Aliens Cause Global Warming
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i dont you understand what im saying, its not the fudging of the data. its the interpretation of it.
say an artifact is 6000 years old according to c14 dating technique. that means it could be either 5500 years old or 6500 years old, now your free to place this piece of artifact as to belong to the reign of this pharoa or that, and youll still be right.
Any scientist worth their salt is going to include the raw data in either the paper's publication, or in an appendix, or will make it available for verification.
Then, a few years later, another scientist will perform a meta-analysis on the raw data, and they will find that the data tells a different story, and they will then proceed to publish that observation.
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny not really. scientists are people too, and have their biases due to their personal beliefs or financial needs.
scientists are no more different than your typical politicians, and the only difference between them is instead of working with lesgilation and legislating, they work with data and the intepretation of it.
Scientists absolutely are just like any other human being. Biases creep in. That is 100% true.
BUT, the degree to which that hinders or blemishes science is nowhere near as high as you're trying to make it seem.
The peer review process is yet another mechanism by which scientific discoveries are monitored.
For every paper published in a reputable journal, there are like 5-10 respected PhD'd scholars in the same field reviewing that paper.
Of course blips will sneak by from time to time, but eventually they are discovered and refuted.
In academia, if you can actually demonstrate that a long-held assumption in your field is actually false, you will become like the Britney Spears or Backstreet Boys of the academic world. The incentive to find these flaws in existing theories is FUCKING HUGE. -
2019-03-07 at 5:05 AM UTC in Influx of incest porn
-
2019-03-07 at 5:01 AM UTC in In this thread we post pics of ourselves:(
-
2019-03-07 at 4:59 AM UTC in In this thread we post pics of ourselvesOk I gotta bail on all this.
You two have fun, but I can't.
I'm cursed with being a zero on the Kinsey scale.
And it really is a curse because it basically shuts out like half the world's population.
If I had a genie, I'd wish to be smack dab in the middle of the Kinsey scale.
Peak bisexuality is the absolute ideal. -
2019-03-07 at 4:56 AM UTC in Muh xanniez
Originally posted by GGG Are you sure you got GOOD phenibut? I mean I can understand thinking it's subtle, but you should've gotten sick I think. Or maybe alcohol has hardened your body to it. I dunno. Body weird. GGG not know everything. Only most things.
Yeah I've considered that it might just be some kind of cross-tolerance thing.
I also bought some high quality Kava Kava (after researching it and finding it recommended by high rep posters on various sites as even "TOO potent"), and then I took like 4 times the suggested dose, and still nothing (MAYBE some subtle plabeo-ish effects).
With Phenibut, though, I've only tried two different batches (like 5 years apart), but neither were all that effective.
I might try getting some straight up Phenibut FAA and try that.
I mean, I did convert some of my Phenibut HCl to FAA, but it only made it easier to ingest, and didn't do much effects-wise. -
2019-03-07 at 4:50 AM UTC in In this thread we post pics of ourselves
-
2019-03-07 at 4:50 AM UTC in Influx of incest porn
-
2019-03-07 at 4:47 AM UTC in In this thread we post pics of ourselves
-
2019-03-07 at 4:44 AM UTC in Influx of incest pornAh, dolphin rape...
And earlier today I thought I had seen the weirdest thing I would see for the day. -
2019-03-07 at 4:41 AM UTC in Aliens Cause Global Warming
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny this wrong.
for example, an archeological piece needs its age to be radiocarbon dated. the range of c14 dating is about roughly +-500 years.
now, any archeologist who have an agenda to put a piece of artifact to his or her preffered dynasty would have no problem of doing so and still be able to say his or her claim is scientific facts.
the same goes for ice core samples.
Yeah, an INDIVIDUAL could totally fudge up their data... But then when that same study is scrutinized by others in the field, or new evidence comes to light, then that PARTICULAR SCIENTIST will be shown for the fraud that they are.
For ENTIRE scientific fields to pull this shit off would require a little thing called a conspiracy.
And the second anyone started dropping that particular C-word, I'm out.
I'll debate reality, not wild and unsubstantiated speculation. -
2019-03-07 at 4:39 AM UTC in Aliens Cause Global Warming
Originally posted by -SpectraL No, it's not, because "interpreting" of the results also relies on the "interpreter's" motivation and agenda. Sorry, but "scientists" lost any and all credibility long ago. They made their bed, now they need to lie in it.
ie:
Coffee is good for you!
Coffee is bad for you!
Sugar is good for you!
Sugar is bad for you!
Global warming!
Oops.. I mean climate change!
Which is when I usually reply to them, 'how about go fuck yourself!?'
That's because of incorrect THEORIES, not incorrect DATA.
Theories change over time.
Data does not.
Nobody lied when they said the former in each of your scenarios.
They presented the best possible interpretation of the FACTS at the time.
