User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by Obbe
-
2017-07-07 at 9:43 PM UTC in bias and magical beliefs
Originally posted by 霍比特人 How can you say science is a tool though? Science is the most objective reality we have. It isn't a tool any more than you would say oxygen is a tool for breathing. It's so inherent that to call it a tool implies its something to be manipulated. You can't manipulate objective reality.
What's inherent about science? It didn't exist for most of the history of the world, of life, of our species. It doesn't seem to be any more natural than any other human invention. And in the fairly short time it's been with us it's changed internally and radically. The modern practice of science seems like whatever the opposite of "inherent" is to me.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-07-07 at 3:03 PM UTC in bias and magical beliefsThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-06-30 at 9:33 PM UTC in Deleted posts for: Cone of TruthGentlemen, the truth is not hidden among endless streams of data.
It certainly is not found on google or reddit.
But this place... This is like a sacred blessed domain.
We draw power from this together.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-06-29 at 11:38 PM UTC in the race to fuck hts
Originally posted by infinityshock sexuality is designed for one single specific purpose: continuity of the species.
according to WHO ??? you ??? Gott ??/ evolutionists ???? Darwin ????
Our genitals are multipurpose ; they are to pee, and they are for intercourses,
how are we to be so sure that our sexuality are pure, single purpose and not multipurpose ????The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-06-16 at 8:51 AM UTC in I need to talk to a Psychonaut that isn't a complete asshole
Originally posted by Lanny Hooo boy, there are whole dimensions of pain you've yet to learn about
Trust me, I know a little. That cheap Mexican clinic trip I puked all over my floor and felt like every inch of my body was being pierced by millions of needles. The word that kept coming to mind was EXCORIATED. I didn't even know what it meant, but I was convinced I was being EXCORIATED. Looked up the definition afterwards and it was accurate af. I remember after I puked all over the floor I remember thinking that that was basically me, a pile of fucking puke, and I was convinced that I shouldn't be permitted to exist. That I was as disgusting as that puke. After that trip I realized that out of all the possible realities and experiences we are all fucking BLESSED to be experiencing this one. There was some Event Horizon shit going on in my mind.
It was fucking gnarly. Also ended up feeling like I didn't exist, which is a rather an ironic sensation. Like "the big jokes is I can't die because I don't even exist". Haha.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-06-11 at 11:19 PM UTC in DeterminismSkimming through this thread, does anybody other than Obbe even know what the fuck determinism is? It doesn't seem like it.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-06-10 at 4:19 PM UTC in DeterminismThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-06-09 at 2:11 AM UTC in Determinism
Originally posted by Sophie I am in the free will camp.
Philosophers typically consider the issue of free will as being orthogonal to physical determinism. There's not really a good argument for physical indeterminism enabling the libertarian notion of free will beyond what's afforded in a deterministic model.Also, if everything is determined why do we even punish criminals?
Because the society where the outcome of crime is punishment is going to contain fewer criminals than the one where it isn't. How your society deals with criminals is part of the deterministic decision making process that generates criminality. -
2017-06-09 at 12:34 AM UTC in DeterminismThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-06-03 at 10:09 PM UTC in did bundy change my personality
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Let go of your anger and stop being retarded. You literally have nothing to be upset about.
I swear this ridiculous overreaction to anything they perceive as negative, and a greater likelihood of perceiving or misinterpreting things as such, is a common symptom of Asperger's. There's actually a neurological basis for this due to anatomical differences in the amygdala and its connection to the prefrontal cortex. Various other factors also have a significant influence on this.
I think I may recall RisiR mentioning a history of mental illness in his family. Very possible he may be suffering from his genetic lineage.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-06-02 at 5:31 PM UTC in how can i transcend my ego?
Originally posted by Open Your Mind See, it's like I said in the beta/beta thread. I try to tell the group the truth and get attacked.
I'm not attacking you, I just felt like responding and couldn't think of anything other than "whoa that's deep". Using the meme was more a jab at myself than it was you, haha. You're an interesting dude.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-06-01 at 11:36 AM UTC in Are pedos monsters or just sick?
Originally posted by Sophie I agree, and to do so one must consider these things on a person to person basis. Ergo, you can't make a blanket statement and say: "All 12yos are mentally incapable of consenting to sex".
I agree and this is fair.
but that's how the law works. the law is unable to determine on an individual level when somebody(adolescent) would be ready for physical relationships. so it determines that nearly all are ready by a certain age, i.e 16 in the UK, 18 in the US, and imposes a blanket ban on sexual relations with anyone under that age. if it was left to the individual to determine this before entering into relations it would be ridiculous. an offender could just claim that the victim seemed ready, acted ready, and they had no clue to lead them to assume otherwise.
even tho this means that many are ready before the age of consent, without the means to determine individualy, society just has to accept the blanket ruling.
as I said before in this fred, a post pubescent teen is physically very little different to an older teen who is above the age of consent. so if you are deliberately targeting an under age, then its not because of the physical attraction, its because they are under age that is attracting you. its the naughtiness, the increased risk that is exciting you. whether the offender realizes this or not.
.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-06-01 at 12:59 AM UTC in Are pedos monsters or just sick?
Originally posted by Memeing_Electron I would assume that because all value is determined by sentience, and since most economic and social systems in place defend the individual, then the reasonable assumption would mean that you should generally avoid doing harm to any sentience/individual. Changing the thinking/feeling of an individual (making them go a different route than what is most safe and effective for them) would be the equivalent of crippling them socially/emotionally/mentally. The effects of this are not noticeable unless you're looking for it, but the effects do exist.
As a closing note on this i would like to add that i believe i cannot decide for other people what is best for them. It is not my right nor my place, therefore everyone should decide for themselves what is best. If they feel agreeing to X action is what they want and feel what is best then who am i to say no?
Of course this does not apply to really young kids who can't know what is best for them so the crux of the matter is when do we consider someone mature or old enough to agree or consent to X action. Like i said, we should determine this on a person to person basis.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-06-01 at 12:30 AM UTC in Are pedos monsters or just sick?The problem with consent in regards to sex is the same as consent with any sort of transaction. Both parties need to know the true values of exchanged goods or services, as well as terms of the exchange. If you were to swindle someone by making a deal that they did not fully comprehend, then you have done wrong, because you took advantage of the person's intellectual shortcomings (this argument could be used to argue against rights for individuals and such, but that's a topic for a different thread).
The same concept applies to a sexual exchange between a child and an adult. The child, regardless of theoretical knowledge of sex or their enthusiasm to try something new, is incapable of making a fully informed and neutral decision (neutral as in logical and not blindly fueled by hormones. If you let hormones lead you to fuck everything, you have the intellect of a retard and should be protected as such). Children are on an inferior level intellectually because they are still getting a grasp on choosing logic over bodily impulses, they have much to learn about the world, and they are physically and mentally incapable of defending themselves if any interaction or psychological/physiological transaction were to occur.
Same goes for dumb adults. Don't stick your dick into a retard either, you shit.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-30 at 7:03 PM UTC in Are pedos monsters or just sick?
Originally posted by Open Your Mind From what I can tell the pro-pedo argument that Sophie proposes is that getting consent from the child makes it ok. The argument most people use to counter that children are not actually mature enough to give that consent.
I want to hear more opinions from more members on this. If a child gives consent is it still immoral?
a child doesn't know what it wants from one minute to the next. one moment they want this, then that, then its this again. their brain isn't developed enough to make an informed decision on much more than which flavour ice cream they want. how the fuck could they possibly make a decision on a subject they know fuck all about?
.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-30 at 12:11 PM UTC in Are pedos monsters or just sick?The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-05-30 at 11:02 AM UTC in Are pedos monsters or just sick?
Originally posted by Dargo I think it is extremely immoral. Not being a pedo in and of itself, but the choice to indulge in those deviant thoughts and seek out things such as CP or relations with lolis.
weighing your desires against someone else's safety, physical, psychological or otherwise is pretty filthyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-30 at 10:54 AM UTC in Are pedos monsters or just sick?
-
2017-05-30 at 1:28 AM UTC in Are pedos monsters or just sick?
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Right you dont choose. Their brains are just wired that way. I guess what I want to know from you mmQ is whether or not you would change that about someone if it were possible. If it were like healing an injury or correcting a cleft palate. Would you correct an abnormality in someone's brain of it were the cause of their desire to fuck children? Would you correct an abnormality in someone's brain if it were the cause of their desire to murder people?
Yes.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-05-29 at 11:08 PM UTC in teh retraded thred herppppp slober fuk glum editshin
Originally posted by Malice You're misusing the word: patronize - treat with an apparent kindness that betrays a feeling of superiority.
I'm not patronizing you, there's no illusion of kindness involved, this is pure belittlement.
You're talking down to me as though I'm too inept to know what field I work in or one typically obtains a bag of weed. That's patronizing. We both know I know how to fucking get weed 99 times out of 100. Instead of waiting for my dealer to get off work I wanted one sooner. It's not that crazy.
Go answer obbes question.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
