User Controls
Posts That Were Thanked by Obbe
-
2017-08-23 at 12:32 PM UTC in "Nimrod" is an interesting insult.It was singlehandedly turned into an insult by Bugs Bunny. Not even kidding. In the canon, Nimrod is a great hunter. So in Bugs Bunny, he sarcastically refers to Elmer Fudd as Nimrod because he can't even hunt one measly rabbit.
-
2017-08-21 at 6:01 PM UTC in livin with parents and trippin delemas threadSo your mother is now supposedly a single mom because of you, and has to work long 12 hour days to support your able bodied ass while you sit in your room doing drugs all day like a pathetic manchild.
Cool story brah. -
2017-08-12 at 11:43 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
Originally posted by hydromorphone As for my son, if I suicide now, he won't remember me when he's older so it'll be fine.
you think nobody is gonna sit him down when he asks why he hasn't got a mom, and tell him..,
i'm sorry son, but your mom was very mentally ill and committed suicide when you were very young'.
but what he will actually hear is...
'i'm sorry son, but your mom didn't give a shit about you enough to stay around and look after you, you obviously never meant anything to her and she obviously had no desire what so ever to want to see you grow up and see what you became with your life. she obviously had no concern pertaining to protecting you from any harm or dangers you may of faced during your childhood, or to seeing to it that you stayed on the right track and were looked after and had everything you needed. or had any interest in just being there for you on all the countless times during your life when you just needed advice, support or encouragement, or for those times when you just needed your mom, like just for a hug, or to show him he's loved like every child needs countless times while growing up and even as an adult. she simply gave no thought to you what so ever'.
and as time goes by, in his head that will turn into...
fucking bitch, just leaving me like this. i fucking hate her'.
i mean go ahead hydro, do it, you certainly won't regret it if you do. your son on the other hand will regret what you did every day of his fucked up, miserable little life.
. -
2017-08-10 at 8:40 PM UTC in Pulling ya girl's yoga pants down and fucking her while you finger her clit
Originally posted by hydromorphone You do realize… vaginas get fingered… uh, not clits, right? they get rubbed… like, you aren't going to fit anything "in" a clit, because it's got no "in"… Clits are like micro penises…
In this case, the interpretation I got from the OP is that he is using fingering synonymously with "rub". I agree that "fingering" sounds somewhat off , and it perhaps IS being misused in Op's vocabulary but I still instantly knew that the sexual stimulating act he was referring to was "rubbing a clit."
Hydro probably knew what he meant as well but the vocabulary conundrum he had gotten himself into was too good for her to pass up. lol, he kind of walked right into that one. Maybe you should have thrown in a Guess you didn't read that anatomy book in high school either?! AMIRITE?
Although, yes, I do agree, "rub" works a lot better than "finger" when speaking about this specific type of sexual stimulation. The important thing is that I still understood what he meant and we were both thinking of the same thing in regards to the the actual physical stimulation being described. I did not jump to a ludicrous conclusion that he is trying to rip open an entry way through the clitours only to be proceeded by aggressive finger banging no more and no less that 3 fingers worth. No, no, no, of course not. That would be just insane. I hope would hope that most men wouldn't be so thrown off in a similar situation if it were the female to have a vocabulary mixup.
Originally posted by NARCassist if a girl said 'finger my clit' to a lot of idiots she'd prolly get her clit poked out.
"Wait, what? She wants me to finger her clit? Oh god that is so confusing, why didn't she just ask me to rub it? Oh what am I gonna do, I can't look like I don't know what I'm doing. Oh Gods in the heavens above, why must you torment me with this tricky word play? .... Oh well, guess I'll just poke it out.
Post last edited by What_a_Kreep at 2017-08-10T20:44:37.643903+00:00 -
2017-07-30 at 6:48 PM UTC in Recommend me a book...The Stand [1978/Unabridged]] is an epic read.
-
2017-07-26 at 5:45 PM UTC in The Music Forums Next Top NameThe Vinyl Solution
-
2017-07-26 at 3:52 PM UTC in autistic people were born with spider eggs in their brain
-
2017-07-23 at 12:48 AM UTC in Human-like A.I. within 9 yearsNo one gives a shit if you incidentally didn't read something, actively refused to read something, are mentally incapable of reading something, or transcendentally beyond reading something. It's just a snotty reply that neither generates discussion or is an amusing retort. I'm not even the one you're not reading and it's obnoxious to see the same reply to every other post got dang.
-
2017-07-19 at 8:17 AM UTC in Feminismmmm, you can smell the ignorance of this thread from a mile away. Continue angry men of the world, your rage delights me
-
2017-07-18 at 4:06 PM UTC in Lanny you fucking faggot
-
2017-07-16 at 7:52 PM UTC in God Bless the European people
-
2017-07-16 at 7:38 PM UTC in God Bless the European people
-
2017-07-15 at 7:43 PM UTC in ITT we post really sexy womenthe url needs to end .jpg, or .png etc for it to be embedded as an image. yours aren't tho.
Originally posted by Open Your Mind [..Img]https://i.imgur.com/pY1MUiS_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=high[/img..]
[..Img]https://i.imgur.com/h5Q3jlG_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=high[/img..]
[..Img]https://i.imgur.com/h87d6Zp_d.webp?maxwidth=640&shape=thumb&fidelity=high[/img..]
if you replaced the '_d.webp?..........' with .jpg, then they should work.
. -
2017-07-12 at 7:39 AM UTC in Texas should legalize mjGood luck, Bill Krozby. Shit ain't gonna happen in Keksas
Originally posted by anra I'm curious what all this MJ legalisation will do to the skilled workforce over the next few years
I'd imagine it will get better in some forms as people who were previously barred simply for smoking weed are able to start getting better jobs.
Inb4 fake piss, not everyone is comfortable/that doesn't always work. -
2017-07-11 at 2:40 PM UTC in Captain Falcon vs Lanny
Originally posted by greenplastic o rly?
because it really sounds like you do
He doesn't care so much, that he's got to make sure we all know how much he doesn't care. By making multiple posts that reiterate just how little he cares and the zero fucks he could give about a subject that he hadn't even noticed in the first place because he wasn't paying attention due to the fact he doesn't really care. -
2017-07-11 at 5:39 AM UTC in bias and magical beliefs
Originally posted by 霍比特人 And science is the language of truth. If you haven't found out the truth, you haven't done proper science.
I don't think that's a very fair analysis of what "proper science" is. Indeed, some of those we consider the greatest minds of science in history, Aristotle, Herophilus, Newton, Darwin, Einstein, and many other productive if lesser scientists throughout the ages have advanced theories which simply were not true yet were tremendously useful and revolutionary in multiple fields. Surely we can't fault Newton, say he did "improper science", when he failed to anticipate relativistic phenomenon he had no means of observing. And if we could, on what possible basis could we say we are now conducting "proper" science knowing paradigmatic revolution could be just around the corner? -
2017-07-10 at 9:13 PM UTC in A comprehensive list of hydro's craziness
Originally posted by Open Your Mind Yeah remember you were saying stupid stuff like "I think there's 2 sciences" and philosophy is useless and how you only posted in the thread after seeing me post and called me an acid burn out. You know giving me the gears, giving me a hard time, why did you do that?
The guy is either trying to troll half the time or just posts whatever bullshit comes into his head without thinking and then doesn't want to admit when he's wrong. I can't figure out which -
2017-07-08 at 2:06 AM UTC in bias and magical beliefskill yourself
-
2017-07-07 at 10:24 PM UTC in bias and magical beliefs
Originally posted by 霍比特人 When I say science I mean 'true science' as in what is objectively real. Obviously science, being a human construct, doesn't know everything.
I see there being two sciences. Science as a study of reality, and science as the organization of reality.
I definitely consider the laws of physics to be an example of science/reality. It is (so far) an objective reality about the universe. You can't manipulate the noumenal world. If something is able to be manipulated/changed then it simply isn't true and is therefore no longer science.
So that's the better part of the issue resolved: when we talk about science in the philosophy of science, and I'll argue even common usage aligns with this, we're talking about either a process by which with study the world or the human institution tasked with studying the world. Using science as a synonym for reality is, uhhh, a little unexpected. But if we understand the terminological issue then you should agree with Obbe's original statement that science (per the usage I've described) is a tool: it's a technique we use to attempt to study the objective world. -
2017-07-07 at 9:59 PM UTC in bias and magical beliefs
Originally posted by 霍比特人 If you want to make this a semantics game you can fuck off. Call it reality or whatever. And if you don't believe in objective reality you can also fuck off. You guys know just as well as I do that science is more than just 'the study of.' I'd like to see you give more than a semantics argument on how it is a tool, if that's what you believe.
I mean it seems like it's already a semantic argument, I think what you are referring to when you say "science" is something very different than what the rest of us use the term to mean. The laws of physics are not science in the way we use the term in, say, the philosophy of science, although the process by which we discover the laws of physics probably is. Is it fair to say you would consider "laws of physics" to be an "example of science" per your usage so far ITT?