User Controls
Posts by NARCassist
-
2017-09-05 at 10:49 PM UTC in I Cant See Underneath My Tits.i think we prolly got different ideas on what 3rd world means. to me its a country that lacks infrastructure, reliable and affordable healthcare, access to clean water, shit like that. places like afganistan for example where most people live on a par with europe 500 years ago. places where the vast majority of the country live in extreme poverty and prolly don't even have access to electricity. south africa has infrastructure, it has thriving cities where they have clean water. they have pretty good healthcare altho i can't comment on its affordability by all citizens. they have a good tourism economy and altho they might not completely compare to europe and the US, they are hardly afganistan.
. -
2017-09-05 at 10:01 PM UTC in I Cant See Underneath My Tits.btw, if you want the link for that^ then check your own post above
. -
2017-09-05 at 10 PM UTC in I Cant See Underneath My Tits.
Criticism of the term "developing country"
This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (March 2013) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
There is some criticism of the use of the term "developing country". The term implies inferiority of a "developing country" or "undeveloped country" compared with a "developed country", which many countries dislike. It is criticized for being too positive and too negative.
It assumes a desire to "develop" along the traditional Western model of economic development, which a few countries, such as Cuba and Bhutan, choose not to follow.[4]
The concept of "development" rests on the assumption that Modernization theory holds. Modernization theory, as the dominant development theory of the late 19th and 20th centuries, has largely contributed to the definition of "development". In short, it argues that there is only one way to achieve "modernity" and "development" - that of "Western" nation-states. Largely challenged today, modernization theory still holds an important role in defining "development".
The term "developing" implies mobility and does not acknowledge that development may be in decline or static in some countries, particularly in southern African states worst affected by HIV/AIDS. In such cases, the term "developing country" may be considered a euphemism. The term implies homogeneity between such countries, which vary widely. The term also implies homogeneity within such countries when wealth (and health) of the most and least affluent groups varies widely. Similarly, the term "developed country" incorrectly implies a lack of continuing economic development/growth in more-developed countries.
In general, development entails a modern infrastructure (both physical and institutional), and a move away from low value added sectors such as agriculture and natural resource extraction. Developed countries, in comparison, usually have economic systems based on continuous, self-sustaining economic growth in the tertiary sector of the economy and quaternary sector of the economy and high material standards of living. However, there are notable exceptions, as some countries considered developed have a significant component of primary industries in their national economies, e.g., Norway, Canada, Australia. The USA and Western Europe have a very important agricultural sector, and are major players in international agricultural markets. Also, natural resource extraction can be a very profitable industry (high value added), e.g., oil extraction.
An alternative measurement that has been suggested is that of gross national happiness, measuring the actual satisfaction of people as opposed to how fiscally wealthy a country is.
During the late 20th century, and with the advance of World-systems theory, the notions of "developed country" and "developing country" have started to slowly be replaced by the less-controversial, trade-based, notions of "core country", "semi-periphery country" and "periphery country". The terms of "developing countries" and "developed countries", although obsolete, still continue to be dominant, as part of the official narrative.
you can stfu now
. -
2017-09-05 at 9:53 PM UTC in A better linux ???i got the original trilogy alright. they are now 4,5 and 6 tho. its 1, 2 and 3 that i got fucked up. and 7 the force awakens as well.
. -
2017-09-05 at 9:49 PM UTC in The whose alt is who's fredNARCassist is is all mememememe with me
. -
2017-09-05 at 9:49 PM UTC in The whose alt is who's fredreveal any alts you know of.
like
霍比特人说中文不好 is §m£ÂgØL
Needledick is actor
Matrix is sploo (i know he got others but can't think which they are off the top of my head)
. -
2017-09-05 at 9:44 PM UTC in what are the odds .....DEFCON 1 EVERYBODY, DEFCON 1 ^
. -
2017-09-05 at 9:31 PM UTC in what are the odds .....would certainly explain mill the fat's constant use of code words like nigger dick and colon.
. -
2017-09-05 at 9:29 PM UTC in pakistan should be wiped off the earth
-
2017-09-05 at 9:28 PM UTC in Yellowstonethe drunken old bastard
. -
2017-09-05 at 9:27 PM UTC in Yellowstone
-
2017-09-05 at 9:23 PM UTC in My dog has a gash in her legcanine abuse
. -
2017-09-05 at 9:21 PM UTC in @ those of you who lived where weed became legal
-
2017-09-05 at 9:18 PM UTC in In Druggland ....
-
2017-09-05 at 9:16 PM UTC in In Druggland ....i said on the silk road forums years ago that it would be the best idea if addictive drugs were legalized, that they should only be made available via mail order, like the dnm type set-up. that way it would take away the option of buying your certain amount, and then caning it quick and going straight out and buying more. the very earliest you'd be able to get more would be the next day. especially with crack, that stuff is the worst for that. many times i got paid and thought i'd just treat myself to a 20. then 4 hours later i'm skint and going off on the rob, lol.
. -
2017-09-05 at 9:03 PM UTC in Serial animal fucker
Originally posted by infinityshock 4 years for killing a chicken
7 years for killing a bird…a really annoying bird, at that.
who the fuck is paying for all his court appearances and bleeding-bottoms motel stay? the fucker rode his bike to molest the bird…he sure to fuck doesnt have any money
if the people want to enjoy the safety of having this guy removed from society then they have to pay for it, nobody else is going to.
. -
2017-09-05 at 8:59 PM UTC in In Druggland ....
Originally posted by mmQ Fucking tax it, steal more money off the streets and into the govt pocket. Depends on your government at that point how beneficial or detrimental this could be for the populus.
it would be very beneficial financially just from costs saved by law enforcement as well as value of property that is lost or damaged due to drug crime. so insurances would also go down. of course if they did something stupid like taxing the fuck out of it then that benefit would be lost. addicts would still have trouble financing their habit so would go and rob etc to pay for the legal drugs just like they do now for the expensive legal drugs.
. -
2017-09-05 at 8:55 PM UTC in I Cant See Underneath My Tits.
-
2017-09-05 at 8:41 PM UTC in Why does this happen
-
2017-09-05 at 8:37 PM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS