User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 324
  6. 325
  7. 326
  8. 327
  9. 328
  10. 329
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386

Posts That Were Thanked by mmQ

  1. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    neurolinguistic programming
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. He went to the Rajmahal to get baptized with trianglist snake limericks.

    Also i pissed off my dad so much today he almost called the cops

    I kept singing WHEN BUNDY WAS IN EGYPTS LAND

    LET MY BUNDY GOOOOO

    It's a religious song

    billy and landy
    bindy and landy
    landy and sandy
    mandy and sandy

    are you gonna do the hopscotch pogo with the butterscotch popsickle

    EEEEEE ??? CCCCCC !!!! PLENTLY OF EYECS AND ICYES AND ICIES AND ICUP AND I SEE YOU BE ME WE HE SHE TREE EEEEE CCCCC U HEPTATIO EEEEE U SEEEE ME ME MEMEM EMEEMEM eye c heptatitio hepul heptul kiptul fractal in the nichioliolioliolio in your i see u pees eee eee eee eee you have heptul c eye c u i c up CCCCCeye heptul hepatatio nichololio on your christmas yo!
    hepatito CCCCC eye C U CU CI CUU P I SEE YOU PEE YO ON CHRISTMAS, JOE! would you like some hepatitio with your cheerios and doritos chomo homo my bro yo named joe CCCCeyeCCCCUICUPICUPISEEYOUPEE. shekel ho ho ho!
    merry christmas yo!
    saint nichololio
    saint nicokekohepoheptatito
    hepatito
    heptatio eyes CCCCCC

    Ever eat a loaf of ear
    Ever rub lidocaine cream EVERYWHERE to get an imitation bundy high
    Cubic zirconhead
    Kubrick, a klon, ed!
    Somatoform Spongiform somniferum
    Somatoform bundy
    Floormat,Platform. Don't rundy
    Or youll end up a landy in bolognalumby

    kuje tej landy 12loop ouuul






    Post last edited by matrix at 2017-08-20T23:19:32.507805+00:00
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. are you fucking kidding me actor?

    you need to get your shit together and quit being such a pussy
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. mashlehash victim of incest [my perspicuously dependant flavourlessness]
    If you're not sure about meth, crack or dope then you don't belong.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. mashlehash victim of incest [my perspicuously dependant flavourlessness]
    That looks like stupidnoob
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. mashlehash victim of incest [my perspicuously dependant flavourlessness]
    I've wasted enough time reading your posts....

    They're all about dick

    gay
    for
    me
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  7. Don't worry, that's just your organs shutting down.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. Grimace motherfucker [my enumerable hindi guideword]
    From 11-14 I wore a back brace that caged my torso with metal. It had gears and pulleys and I was instructed to twist it tighter every so many weeks to gradually straighten my badly deformed spine. The tightening forced my back straight and it often caused excruciating pain as my growing body got used to the straighter posture. My family would all point at me and laugh and say, "Hahhaha! Look at the reject!! Look at the defective reject!!"

    WHO'S LAUGHING NOW, MOM?! WHO THE FUCK IS LAUGHING NOW?

    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. benny vader YELLOW GHOST
    Originally posted by infinityshock you mistake 'cant' for 'wont.'

    youre the idiot that thinks the yolk turns into the chick

    how many eggs have you hatched, again?

    you delude yourself with ''cant'' for ''wont''.

    anyway, it doesnt take a genius to hatch eggs. a hen with an iq of a hen is capable of hatching eggs. alone.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. NARCassist gollums fat coach
    you officially the biggest nigger dick obsessed faggot on NIS



    .
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. Originally posted by mmQ So, even though it's clearly generally agreeable what we consider as sins, is it not still a man-made concept that steals the essence of what Earth may have wanted for us, true nature, no rules other than the limitations of the planet itself.

    You are not apart from nature. Man made constructs are no less natural than an ant colony or a beehive. So that is the tautological argument: the way we are is the way nature intended, because we are a part of nature.

    But I think you deserve a better answer than that.

    You agree that this "total freedom", no rules, is the state of nature, right?

    Well let me introduce you to the idea of the categorical imperative:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categorical_imperative

    I recommend that you give the article a read, but let me give you the gist of it; since the "state of nature" is for everyone to be able to do anything they want, it can be argued that once everything exercises all of its "freedoms", the freedoms of everything principally cancel out; for practically every action, there is also a negation.

    For example, a cat's "right" by nature to kill a mouse is cancelled out by the mouse's "right" by nature to defend against being killed. (CF's note; when this arises in a practical circumstance, the fact that these do not "cancel" per season is that the practical exercise of these rights does not live up to the ideal, principle exercise of these rights).

    Kant therefore asserts that the state of nature principally has no freedom due to the fact that every individual is allowed to exercise their right; all these rights cancel out, infinitely.

    Therefore to truly have any freedoms, he contends that we must enter, as we have, a "state of society". In a state of society, we give up some of our rights, so that we may be able to exercise other rights. For example, you must all give up your right to murder someone, so that you may exercise your right to life. (CF's note: and you can take this further to say that when you violate someone else's right to life, you must also therefore forfeit your own right to life.)

    In this way, we can say that the "natural" state for a being that values true freedom, is the state of society, with rules, and not the state of nature.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  12. To put it simply, a compatibilist would also argue that most of your actions are NOT free will, if they are made out of first order reasoning rather than higher order reasoning. And unless you do employ 2nd or higher order reasoning, you are no different than a computer or a rock.

    Then the question is simply, why does the existence of an ultimate external cause, invalidate the freedom of all the subsequent internal processes?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  13. kroz weak whyte, frothy cuck, and former twink
    Originally posted by Dargo The shamelessness has no end.

    it was a playful slap, I've been slapped a couple times at bars by drunk chicks in the last year and I slapped them back. Just having fun, lighten up chicken.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery Space Nigga [my yellow-marked arboreous hypnotist]
    Originally posted by Bill Krozby bling just hangs on tinybltc because he finally got mod. sploo is in a mental hospital from abusing bundy and scrawny post else where because he doesn't like this site anymore.

    Is Bundy his dog's name?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  15. The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. fag Houston
    There was a real crazy one I heard about they did in the dark ages, They would tie a person between two small fishing boats, one on top of the other with the person in between. Then make some small cuts into the person and let them float on a lake and they would be eaten alive by maggots and bugs.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. This mind numbing conversation in a nutshell:

    Obbe: The animal Zarblox is impossible

    Me: What is Zarblox?

    Obbe: What everyone thinks what Zarblox is.

    Me: What does everyone think Zarblox is?

    Obbe: An animal that is impossible

    Me: But what the fuck is a Zarblox? Is Zarblox just any creature that is impossible? In that case, I could tell you a creature that is impossible and it would be a Zarblox.

    Obbe: No, that's not what Zarblox is, a Zarblox is a creature that is impossible

    Me: How is it impossible? Is it impossible for it to physically exist? Conceptually exist?

    Obbe: Zarblox is impossible

    Me: What impossible characteristics does it have?

    Obbe: Zarblox is impossible

    Me: What would it take for Zarblox to be possible?

    Obbe: Zarblox is impossible

    Me: Lets assume Zarblox is possible and exist. What would it look like?

    Obbe: Zarblox is impossible

    Me: Lets assume Zarblox is possible and exist. What would it behave like?

    Obbe: Zarblox is impossible
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. Originally posted by Open Your Mind Are we the same person? If you put input into two systems that have different programming, do you get the same output? Do computers have your so-called "freewill"?

    Compatibilism has already addressed this question. Again, if you're not willing to brush up on the basic terms, then why are you insisting on discussing the subject?

    Is a computer an agent of free will? No. Considering that it is being compelled by an(other) agent of free will (whatever human or ultimately human designed system goes into creating it), it is not. So stop babbling it over an over. In compatibilist theory, this would be like me putting you in chains and making you perform a certain action.

    Your output is not determined by external inputs. You, as a system, are creating outputs as a result of your mechanical (in the most literaly sense of the word, your physical mechanics) predispositions, and we both agree on that. But you are literally giving me a nonsense argument for how that isn't free will because you could not do otherwise.

    so again, for the jillionth time, ignore any part of my argument, and answedr this question; for a free being, if they do not spit out outputs based on some mechanical predisposition, by what mechanism would they make a free choice, and how would it be distinct from either randomness or free choice?

    I don't want your retarded babbling about the the intuitive idea of free will, because you're trying to avoid making a specific definition by trying to make me accept a flawed inference. I have explicitly defined my parameters, and it is time for you to define yours, or kill yourself.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. Originally posted by Open Your Mind A rock that is hit with a hammer spits out an "output" relative the "input" it is given … according to your logic, this is what you consider to be free will.

    No because you, as an agent of free will, are making it do something. Its predisposition, by the fundàmental laws of the universe, is to stay at rest. In the same way, me hitting you in the head with a sledgehammer does not make the spattering of your brains into a free action.

    So this argument now is about you not understanding compatibilism and using my simplified version for you (because you're getting dinner and dumber in the discussion) to give a weird broken idea of it and build an argument off it.

    In compatibilist theory, we account for qualia of thought, second (and higher) order reasoning and agency. But I'm not going to get into this discussion with you because at this point, it's just your job to educate yourself on basic terms rather than vomit out words without understanding the core concepts involved.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. kroz weak whyte, frothy cuck, and former twink
    You mad again lil dawg?
    \
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 324
  6. 325
  7. 326
  8. 327
  9. 328
  10. 329
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386
Jump to Top