User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 262
  6. 263
  7. 264
  8. 265
  9. 266
  10. 267
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386

Posts That Were Thanked by mmQ

  1. Lanny Bird of Courage
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  2. Yes, take a regular $10 bill and bleach it in a pan filled with concrete stripper. Then print the old pre-1990s $100 bill scans (available online) on to it with a good quality laser printer. Then rough it up so it looks used. Or if your $10 bill was mint, don't rough it up and say it's from a collection. Or literally sell the damn bill online to money collectors.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  3. Originally posted by Sudo You are wrong about all these. Jessica is a generic white girl name and some white girls are fat but also some aren't.

    Cindy is a trashy old milf name. Every Cindy smokes cigarettes and wears too much makeup.

    Bethanys are the closest as many are overweight but this is not to be confused with Elizabeths who are not fat so make sure you know your Beth derivatives

    Abby is just a white whore name

    The fattest girl I ever knew was CASSIDY. I only knew her from kidergarten to first grade, but she was the prodigous essence of FAT incarnate.

    She left and I was soooo sooooo happy, good to hear it!

    I had a dream where I wanted to hug her buttcheeks and I told my friend Alex. He was very confused
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    Originally posted by ohfralala Paula

    Paula is an overworked office drone with shoulder pads
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. Item 9 African Astronaut
    It was total bullshit, all I did was get over into a left turning lane, at a normal pace not slow, and this douchebag behind me who had JUST switched lanes into the same lane as me, had to BARELY slow down for me to get over, sticks his hand out his window and gives me the finger because I "slowed him down"...even though I didn't and the piece of shit still totally made the light anyways.

    ...I had a brief fantasy about driving after him and pulling up beside him and honking my horn to get him to look over at me, pulling out a gun and shooting him in the lower face or neck and then driving off... but then after i got home and smoked some weed i forgot about it...
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. HTS highlight reel
    Originally posted by aldra you two have diametrically opposite disorders

    We're not so different, Enter and I.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  7. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by HTS I legit don't get it, Enter. Women are great. Women are superior beings. Men are basically biologically perfect for manual labor and slavery and nothing else. You only hate women because they're better than you. Why? Shouldn't they be an inspiration? Why are you so angry? Why can't you relate to women?

    you two have diametrically opposite disorders
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  8. aldra JIDF Controlled Opposition
    Originally posted by HTS It'll never be obvious. The whole point is like boiling a frog, and it just never realizes the water is getting hotter. The new normal will always be normal.

    there are a LOT of kids today who have never not been connected to and catalogued in 'social media'.

    ***Actually Assange recently spoke about that:

    https://www.rt.com/news/438968-assange-last-interview-blackout/
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. Lanny Bird of Courage
    We already won LMAO. We just keep you around because it's hilarious to watch you thinking you have any kind of control over your life. We're working on the "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream" technology right now and in a couple of years you're really going to see what VR can do.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  10. Sudo Black Hole [my hereto riemannian peach]
    Originally posted by Mad Matt You will be shaking that head to the tune of project Matt soon enough

    I cringed my teeth through my jaw
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  11. Everglades makes me think of

    Foreverglades, which is a pretty sounding word & image to me

    Trifle is a stark, bitchy way to dismiss your kid's macoroni art,,,

    Canny is a kind of a trashy word, when i wanna feel like a piece of shit,,

    Lass is incredibly classy, too classy for me me do re me

    Splendid(!) is a word I don't think I'll ever use, but I like how it looks and sowunds!
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  12. I thought we were already living in the NWO?
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  13. RisiR † 29 Autism
    Don't know if this is the right forum but I need a new phone. I want to spend 200€ max.

    Suggestions are appreciated. I know absolutely nothing about phones so please help me out picking a good one.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  14. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by mmQ Uhhhhhhhhh.

    Don't make me have to start on the verses. Nobody wants that.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  15. RisiR † 29 Autism
    I actually know a fat Debbie -Deborah. A rich girl. One of my buddies fucked her with a cucumber. She never brushed her teeth for whatever reason. She only chewed those gums that are supposed to clean your teeth. Pretty nasty.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  16. Nil African Astronaut [the overexcited four-footed chanar]
    Originally posted by mmQ What the hell are you talking about? Jesus Christ.

    Every single post they make is a non-sequitur.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  17. Originally posted by Lanny Fine, you can make this objection but your argument has changed from "morality requires everyone to agree on it to be true" to "morality isn't supported by 'concrete, measurable data'" with the tacit premise that a theory needs to be supported supported by 'concrete, measurable data' to be valid or acceptable

    My argument encompasses everyone needing to use the same foundation and rules for morality in order for one to justly force moral pressure on another.

    That is not to say that a moral system's foundation is true or not, just consistent by all who practice morality, since it is possible for people to be morally consistent, yet use different foundational systems. Those different systems are equally valid because morality is based on feelings. You can say it's about law or canon, but it isn't, as feelings must enter the equation when formulating morality, and men cannot feel each other's feelings, so it unreasonable to assume that two men should always reach the same conclusion on something that requires them to ponder their respective feelings during their reasoning processes.

    If canon is accepted as word of God, which you seem to have agreed with earlier, correct me if I am wrong, that is an exception. As I suggested before, morality is about the feelings of human observations. If there are no feelings involved with decsion making, as you could potentially theorize of bacteria or plants (not that I necessary agree with that premise), then there would be no morality extant within such creatures.

    with the tacit premise that a theory needs to be supported supported by 'concrete, measurable data' to be valid or acceptable

    Yes, my arguement also asserts that theories of how people "ought to think" of their fellow man (ehtics, morality, perhaps other fields) are not calculable, quantifiable, or able to be physically sensed by humans. Therefor, it can not be expected that two men should come to the same moral conclusions, as men will have different definitions of what is good and bad, as I mentioned in my last post:

    Does good denote pleasure? Some people may recieve pleasure by punching others in the face. Well-being? What if I consider my well-being to be living in the hospital when I'm not sick becuase I like how it feels? Happy? Perhaps I am happiest killing infidels for Allah. Even if it is some conglomeration of certain states of being, every state can be reached by different means depending on the person.

    MID POSIT EDIT: After a quick google search on morality, I believe what I wrote here was in fact an example of the Arguement from Disagreement, which I have not read yet. This may help us progress, or at least get us into more meaty (no pun intended) debate.

    That's not a mathematical theorem though. That's you finding that a mathematical model of how collecting coconuts works. If I say "I have two coconuts and I take three coconuts then I should have six coconuts because 2*3=6 but I find I have five" I haven't formed an argument against mathematics, empirical counter evidence, I've simply formed a poor model of coconut collection.

    Okay, I agree with you now that mathematical theorems are not empirical. However, unlike morality, math is calcuable and quantifiable, which means it is reasonable to expect two men to always reach the same conclusions. 2+2 is always 4.

    Falsifiability is a cornerstone of the modern scientific method, to some the idea of falsification or verification is fundamental to meaning in general.

    Yes, we are getting closer.

    Feelings about observations, the basis for morality, are not falsifiable, or replicable because I cannot be you and feel as you feel.

    MID POSIT EDIT#2:::
    Perhaps let me take a moment to back it up as well.

    I believe we are running into the Is-Ought problem.

    EDIT #3:

    OH MY GOD WE WASTED SO MUCH TIME FOR NO REASON especially since I typed all this on my phone

    Okaye
    that was stoopti
    Oka

    I see the world "as is", and I don't necessarily think that it "ought to be" anything. I can't PROVE that is ought it not to be something, but you can't prove that it ought to be something either. To do that requires religion or an ideal view of something, which again, everyone has a different perspective of. What is the ideal way to treat animals? As servants? As friends? As food? As gods? As tools?

    There is nothing about "rationality" that requires measurement. How can you "measure" a logical proposition or argument like "p -> q; p; Q.E.D. q"? What units do you measure it in? What tools do you use to measure it? Rationality isn't about measurement at all.

    I don't know what that is. Think of any mathematical equation you want. I measure it with mathematical units, and I compute it with a calculator or my mind, which calculates.

    Yes, rationality itself does not require measurement, but morality is irrational to believe in because it must be germinated though feelings, which are irrational. It requires

    we can use tools like logic and reasoning and argumentation to reach moral conclusions.

    To build up to them yes, but that building is founded on your feelings, which I cannot feel.

    Originally posted by DietPiano My argument encompasses everyone needing to use the same foundation and rules for morality in order for one to justly force moral pressure on another.

    Storytime:

    Morality requires faith in something. Not necessarily God, but some kind of vision. But I can't understand your vision, and you can't understand mine.

    I think Malice was of the opinion that there was nothing he ought to put his faith in, because he saw no reason to have faith. I appear to be going in the direction of no faith as well.

    However, unlike Malice, I see this not pessimistically and reason for one to kill thyself because there is no point (although Malice had many other major problems I'm not mentioning at the moment).

    I see this as an utterly liberating thing, as I can make whatever experiences I want, think whatever I want, and be free of any chain-gang of the mind others would try to force on me.

    If compassion is the root of morality, I believe compassion, again, is an intricately complex form of egoism. I cannot even prove or disprove morality, nor can you.

    All I know is that I do not know.

    I don't think humans can comprehend what THIS is. I think it's beyond our perceptive abilities to understand existence whatsoever.

    But there is stuff and stuffness, and stuffness is more interesting than nothing, if nothing even exists. Again, I don't think we can even understand the concept of nothing.

    But I'll go with it. I am at peace, because this is the way it is.

    Way I see it, you can see yourself as a servant, or a God. How do you know you aren't God? Has a different God told you you aren't God? We might all be Gods. Working for infinite complexity&feelings, as we do cool shit.

    Isn't that neat!?

    Boy that 5 strip really fucked me up, family.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  18. RisiR † 29 Autism
    Originally posted by mmQ Define sane.

    Not sane.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  19. RisiR † 29 Autism
    Almost a year without smoking weed as a lifestyle for me. ONE MONTH WITHOUT SYNCANS!

    It has actually helped me a lot. I don't plan on starting again anytime soon. God bless.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  20. RisiR † 29 Autism
    I reverse psychologied many people to not kill themselves just to spite me.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 262
  6. 263
  7. 264
  8. 265
  9. 266
  10. 267
  11. ...
  12. 383
  13. 384
  14. 385
  15. 386
Jump to Top