I once drank half a bottle of Goldstrike which is 100 proof, then i told my buddy: Let me drive your motorcycle bro, it'll be fine, he was drunk as well and said: lol ok.
I got on, drove 20 yards and fell over. We were both glad i didn't make it farther and didn't go any faster than 15 Km/h or it probably would have ended badly.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Malice
More signs of the SSRI induced psychosis and psychopathy.
What dose of Prozac are you on now, MQ (if you're still using it)? I noted a distinct shift in your behavior some time after you began taking it months ago.
Honestly Mal, i love and all but you are pretty shit at psychology.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Memeing_Electron
I would assume that because all value is determined by sentience, and since most economic and social systems in place defend the individual, then the reasonable assumption would mean that you should generally avoid doing harm to any sentience/individual. Changing the thinking/feeling of an individual (making them go a different route than what is most safe and effective for them) would be the equivalent of crippling them socially/emotionally/mentally. The effects of this are not noticeable unless you're looking for it, but the effects do exist.
As a closing note on this i would like to add that i believe i cannot decide for other people what is best for them. It is not my right nor my place, therefore everyone should decide for themselves what is best. If they feel agreeing to X action is what they want and feel what is best then who am i to say no?
Of course this does not apply to really young kids who can't know what is best for them so the crux of the matter is when do we consider someone mature or old enough to agree or consent to X action. Like i said, we should determine this on a person to person basis.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
How long until you bleed out? Today i was just sitting on a bench smoking a cig looking down at my feet like a sperg and since i am so white i am almost transparent i could see one big ass vein/artery in the calf area of my leg. I thought, dang, that is one big ass vein. And you know i would slice it open myself just to find out, but i am not sure how i feel about bleeding to death.
inb4doitanyway
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Memeing_Electron
Really the only 12 year old you can fuck would have to be incredibly smart, will have to have encountered and overcome many social and emotional obstacles, and be able to make logical, neutral decisions without being affected by instinct and bodily wants. How you choose to determine that is up to you, and interpretation may always be biased for or against, depending on personal preference. Best suggestion I can give is find an 18 year old with a daddy kink.
I have an age appropriate gf IRL so don't worry about it. (n_n")
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Memeing_Electron
All of what I'm saying is just a basic breakdown of how to behave logically and fairly when interacting with other sentient beings.
I agree, and to do so one must consider these things on a person to person basis. Ergo, you can't make a blanket statement and say: "All 12yos are mentally incapable of consenting to sex".
Originally posted by Memeing_Electron
If you feel that you do not agree with these rules, then feel free to disagree, but remember that that also means that society's rules can't protect you and you're fair game if you happen to catch yourself on the receiving end of an unfair "transaction".
I agree and this is fair.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Memeing_Electron
. With age you should be able to determine whether or not a person is an idiot mentally and emotionally.
Also, the "badness" of such an unfair transaction is a spectrum as opposed to an absolute "good or bad". Cheating someone out of 5k is one thing, it's a whole other thing to change someone's line of emotion and reasoning for life. It's damaging someone's mind while it's in its most crucial stage of development for social interactions
I will agree that it is a spectrum. So how do we determine how much is too much?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
I bet you could fire small nuclear ordnance from a Gustav. Also the Nazis invented jet engines and cruise missiles and all other kinds of cool and useful stuff you fucking jedi.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
So these guys keep up with all the tools to have come out in the pentesting field with links to github and such. It's an interesting resource and i'd invite you to go have a look if you're interested.
