User Controls
Posts by Sophie
-
2016-03-23 at 1:14 AM UTC in Driving on weedSriving on weed is fine. Ir doesn't matter how much i've smoked it's never as bad as when i drink.
-
2016-03-22 at 8:34 PM UTC in VBA Obfuscator/Encrypter + MS Office doc generator and questions regarding VB ScriptBump for VBA improvement pl0x.
-
2016-03-22 at 3:04 PM UTC in Have you ever seen...
That was joke, people he invited. If you can appreciate our sense of humor, I think you'll fit right in.
And you should know that the two pedos/hebes (sophie used to label himself as such, but now I'm not sure if he eventually surpassed that or was lying from the start) here don't represent our community.
I lied, you gotta' ease people into the scope of your depravity. It's better that way. Also, i'm not exlcusive so i like little girls and slightly bigger girls up until my age but she's gotta' be a specific type if i have to like her while she's my age. Basically, petite, small tits and cute as in adorable. -
2016-03-22 at 2:54 PM UTC in Have you ever seen...
I tried to introduce this forum to a bunch of people a couple of days ago and now I hope to god they don't bother coming here, because of this thread.
Weep more intensely, sodomite. -
2016-03-22 at 2:48 PM UTC in Lanny, as per your request
That's such an old picture, I totally look like a dork there. Here's a more updated one:
Caliph Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi is my homie for life. -
2016-03-22 at 3:25 AM UTC in Lanny, as per your request
do you even know what falcon looks like
I am pretty sure he looks like this.
-
2016-03-22 at 3:21 AM UTC in Have you ever seen...
I started the internet when I was 8 or 9 and downloaded so much CP from limewire
its not our fault all these lolis keep posting nudes MAYBE STOP GIVING 10 YEAR OLDS LAPTOPS AND SMARTPHONES
OMG LOOK AT THIS SICK FUCK
She has a weird face. -
2016-03-22 at 3:15 AM UTC in that innocence gives me a throbbing cock erectionMmm Maddie Ziegler, she's growing tits.
-
2016-03-22 at 3:07 AM UTC in If only there was a way to add bitcoin to wallet without putting any money in...
yeah I wish the banking system would implode too
Soon my friend. Soon.
-
2016-03-22 at 2:34 AM UTC in On converting ASM to Bytearray Shellcode and it's applications in malware.
AV scanners are only programmed to detect threats within standalone packing, but are not able to detect threats within certain combinations of packers. That is a fact, Chester. They won't say as much as "boo", even when heuristic scanning is specified.
When i said incorrect it was in reference to this.
[greentext]>It's not the packer or cryptor that makes the old trojan FUD again, it's the way you use the cryptors/packers[/greentext]
It doesn't matter how you use it. What makes it undetectable is the operation of the crypter itself. I'm not saying it's impossible to use multiple crypters/packers/whatever, it's just redundant.
What's more if your packer just compresses the executable it doesn't matter if you use ten of them because heuristics analyzes the behavior of the program. Now if your packer also encodes the executable, you'll take care of heuristics and if your encoding is polymorphic signature analysis becomes impossible as well.
This is a good example of what a proper crypter does, trust me you don't need more than this.
http://seclist.us/pecloak-py-beta-a-...sion-tool.html
Also, FUD is a skid term and who the hell is Chester. -
2016-03-22 at 1:24 AM UTC in I get paid tomorrow at midnight
what the fuck is beedrill
It's his local brand of benadryl. -
2016-03-21 at 8:19 PM UTC in ches rthutsWhat kind of pin was it? Pressure? Stinging? Burning?
-
2016-03-21 at 7:09 PM UTC in On converting ASM to Bytearray Shellcode and it's applications in malware.
Be that as it may, I can covert any detectable trojan or virus into a completely FUD trojan or virus, simply by mixing encryption/packing methods. I've already done it many times and tested the result on major scanners with the latest definitions. Not detected by any, and most of the main functions still work.
Sure, no contest here. This is what packers and crypters are for broadly speaking. -
2016-03-21 at 2:47 PM UTC in Shoplifting from a grocery store, I'm a horrible thief.Is that cum on your omelet?
-
2016-03-21 at 2:33 PM UTC in Lanny, as per your request
IT IS A LEGITIMATE QUESTION "does the nigger have the same moral status as myself?". FUCK NIGGERS who disagree. There is scarcely a sentient soul who doesn't think we need to draw a distinction between ourselves and, say, plants. If one such distinction is possible and widely agreed upon we owe it to at least consider the possibility that similar such distinctions exist between subgroups of homosepians. So let's ask the question honestly: do africans have a lesser moral status than those descended from europeans? In an honest appraisal I believe the answer is no. The element of human nature that makes us morally considerable objects, things whose interests are worth pursuing, is the fact that we have what seems to be the maximal known apparatus for pleasure/suffering. We can feel joy and pain seemingly more intensely than any other species. So then do sub-groups poses greater or lesser capacity for same? I think the answer is yes but we have no significant evidence to assert such capacity cuts along racial lines: indeed the starving african seems to have all of my own facilities that would be involved in an activity like starvation. As keen as my own, or anyone else's suffering, would the africans' be. It is then our duty to alleviate that suffering, to ensure well being in its place, as it is our duty to find ourselves food should we find ourselves starving.
Eh i was just being a racist douche bag for the lulz though, lel. -
2016-03-21 at 1:45 PM UTC in On converting ASM to Bytearray Shellcode and it's applications in malware.
Even if the executable code produces errors, it can still be executable. Just think of PIDs. You can have a situation where some of the PIDs produced by the executable file can be broken, while others can still function normally. In some cases, you'd actually want errors, because the scanner is looking for code which produces no errors, backwards as that sounds.
And this is where your lack of programming knowledge really shines through. When we say errors in the context of code we can mean either of three things.- Syntax errors
- Semantic errors
- Logical errors
When errors are detected we distinguish between run time errors and compile time errors. Your program will run fine when you have a run time error(Dynamic semantic/logical error that the compiler does not detect) but will not do what you expect it to do. In this case your "executable code" has an error in it but it will still run. This has nothing to do with PIDs and you never want errors. Perhaps i should have been more specific and say compile time errors or syntax errors but that's besides the point.For example, if you take an old rootkit (which virus scanners already easily detect), and then run it through UPX, and then run it through ASPack, then run it through UPX again, that breaks SOME of the sub processes on the executable program, while leaving other sub processes fully functional, because certain sections of the program's code get all garbled from using the different packing methods back and forth. The virus scanner then passes right over it, even though a good majority of the code is still known viral code. The scanner doesn't want to produce a possible false positive, so it allows it. Meanwhile, the main process and some of the sub processes may still work… ie: opening port, calling home, replicating, etc. So yeah, even if the executable code is producing errors, it can still be executable.
That's really not how it works. -
2016-03-21 at 5:06 AM UTC in Lanny, as per your request
^^ Yee, that's pretty much it. Cap't said he'd donate to the site if I would fix it, I said I'm working on a fix for a few of the major issues (namely a migration back towards vB3 or 4 which have less buggy/broken approaches towards things like PMs), he said he has cancer and wants to give his money away and I said it'd be better spent with givedirectly, my personally preferred charity which operates by making direct cash transfers to the extremely poor primarily in Kenya and Uganda (a preference made based on the empirical efficacy of the strategy in improving human lives per dollar spent).
Considering the personage in question I think it's safe to assume cap't donated a few bucks and used either photoshop or the browser dev tools (either of which would make it trivially easy to falsify the amount donated) to come up with the screen caps in OP. But my skepticism aside, donating any amount to a good cause is a commendable deed, I'm happy if even a couple of dollars went to helping people who could make better use of that money than people like me or CF.
I could rant for a while on why effective altruism is a good thing, on why first world citizens wildly underestimate both the amount of happiness their money can buy for others, and the happiness they can get from helping others, but that's largely besides the point. The relevant facts here are that starving niggers just got somewhat less starving and that's a good thing. A better thing than you're going to feel all month. A thing which, if you invest in it, will justify your depressive suffering because no matter how bad the exetencialist sense of emptiness we feel as a product of who we are, our upbringings, the albatross of western intellectualism about our necks, something good has been done and even if we are so emptied of a meaningful emotional existence we can at least acknowledge, on a purely intellectual level, that something good has taken place here.
**drunkpost
Niggers not starving is good?
I've stopped computing.
-
2016-03-21 at 4:44 AM UTC in On converting ASM to Bytearray Shellcode and it's applications in malware.
Executable code is a type of code, you child rapist. Executables are executable files.
Yeah the thing is, all code is executable on the condition you don't have any errors. -
2016-03-21 at 4:35 AM UTC in Dropping some dank OClrn2prayer
Our father who art in heaven hallowed be thy name thy kingdom come thy will be done on earth as it is in heaven. Give us this day our daily bread and forgive us our trespasses as we forgive those who trespass against us and lead us not into temptation but deliver us from evil.
[size=6]Amen[/size] -
2016-03-20 at 9:46 PM UTC in Kraken is arguably the best name for a botnet ever.It's an oldie but goodie. Just imagine, your team of blackhat programmers just finished your dank ass botnet and you're about to launch. I imagine a bunch of nerds in an IRC room going like:
[SIZE=72px][SIZE=48px]UNLEASH THE KRAKEN![/SIZE][/SIZE]
Lel. But all joking aside, Kraken was one of the most succesful botnets ever. With an estimated 500k machines infected through IM/SE, when the announcement of it's existence came at the RSA conference between 07/08 the operators took the C&C infrastructure offline and updated their entire botnet, rendering previous research invalid. Very impressive.
Here's an awesome article from the time that really gets into what the botnet was all about.
https://www.fireeye.com/blog/threat-...-botnet-1.html
