User Controls
Posts by HTS
-
2018-07-17 at 11:02 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
-
2018-07-17 at 10:40 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
Originally posted by Madman circumcision is not genital mutilation
Look, it's probably weird for you to acknowledge that your genitals have been mutilated and that you're okay with that... but circumcision is 100% mutilation. I don't even like my dick and I'm planning on potentially mutilating it in far more interesting and complex ways than a simple circumcision, but I DO have foreskin and boy lemme tell you... if I didn't, it'd be because my penis had been brutally cut on and mutilated by some kike-brainwashed doctor at my kike-brainwashed mother's behest. -
2018-07-17 at 2:15 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
Originally posted by RisiR † All you do is argue this SJW bullshit nowadays and I usually try to avoid that term. . I don't like people that (basically) exclusively identify with their sexuality…
I really don't do that anywhere outside of PHM threads (most of the time anyway). He's such a... stereotypical alt-right cuck... and he's been overtly hostile towards me over "my sexuality" or whatever enough times that I basically just play the part to antagonize him. Same with joerell, jigaboo johnson etc. I've totally been on some SJW shit lately, and it's mostly to aggravate those guys. I would barely ever mention being a tranny if it didn't get brought up every time I get into an argument with one of those chucklefucks and make 'em look bad.
Originally posted by RisiR † Meh, sorry Lucy. Please disregard. My assessment was flawed.
Don't worry about it. I mean it wasn't entirely flawed. I have been doing exactly what you said lately, but I mostly ain't serious about it. ♥ -
2018-07-17 at 7:34 AM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
-
2018-07-17 at 6:58 AM UTC in Karen, the world weighs upon me in your absence.
-
2018-07-17 at 5:54 AM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
-
2018-07-17 at 5:52 AM UTC in This is Lanny posting from my Zanick account, fuck all you niggas straight to Hell.
-
2018-07-17 at 5:34 AM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
Originally posted by PrettyHateMachine CP is adult sexuality imposed on children with a completely different perspective and mindset
If you weren't a complete retard you would know this
Children expressing their sexuality is an okay thing.
It usually boils down to sniffing each other's sexual organs and touching them innocently they don't even know about intercourse or squeezing semen out of a vagina or 69ing etc
I get that, I'm just wondering if it was bad for me to look for CP when I was a horny 12 year old. -
2018-07-17 at 5:29 AM UTC in This is Lanny posting from my Zanick account, fuck all you niggas straight to Hell.
-
2018-07-17 at 5:19 AM UTC in She's on a different vibe
-
2018-07-17 at 5:14 AM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
-
2018-07-17 at 5:05 AM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
-
2018-07-16 at 9:21 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
Originally posted by PrettyHateMachine If you have been following the farleft progressive agenda at all you'll notice the trend.
They started out with pushing transgenderism on kids, telling parents they weren't allowed to know what the kids were being taught in school, then they started allowing kids in gay pride festivals twerking half naked next to grown men, then the (((media))) uploaded videos to youtube of everything from consent to gender confusion, then the desmond is amazing psyop.
I can see it already, there will be a children's rights movement in the near future and part of that will be sexuality but the thing worse than pedosexuality is that they want children to be allowed to make any decisions for themselves including leaving their parents for their 39 year old hubby just because they want to, so if you force your child to go to bed at a certain time or wear a certain type of clothing they'll leave you for their pedophile lover.
The most I can see is people letting children sexually experiment with eachother at young ages (ie "don't freak out if you catch your young child playing doctor") and allowing them to "be sexual". Letting kids and adults fuck will still be out of the question, because as you said:
Originally posted by PrettyHateMachine Pedosexuality won't take off from the perspective of the adult
Adults still won't approve of adults having sex with kids. They'll just approve of kids being able to have sex. They'll be okay with letting young kids behave "sexually" (twerking at pride, desmond can still be amazing), but they won't let the old men the kids are twerking in front of take a grab (behaving sexually isn't permission you rapist) and desmond won't be allowed to be amazing in bed with an adult until he's one too. -
2018-07-16 at 9:14 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
-
2018-07-16 at 9:08 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
-
2018-07-16 at 9:04 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Lol…totally and utterly impossible for everyone to agree and accept such a thing. There is NO potential for such a ludicrous suggestion to ever be possible.
And cows aren't perfect spheres. Sure.
It is POSSIBLE though, it's just so wildly improbable that it hardly bears consideration. -
2018-07-16 at 8:55 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
Originally posted by PrettyHateMachine Pedosexuality won't take off from the perspective of the adult, it will come about from the left trying to give children more rights.
This sounds wildly speculative. Would make a good basis for a speculative fiction utopic dystopian novel in the vein of 1984 though. -
2018-07-16 at 8:52 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
Originally posted by joerell once they kill with solid evidence, DNA or an IRK they should be executed and remove the possbility to commit more crimes.
So basically you're just arguing for the death penalty in murder cases, which is ultimately only tangentially related to the subject of pedophilia at best. -
2018-07-16 at 8:44 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Again no they can't…give me an example of a universally applicable moral and I'll try to think of a group that would kill you/jail you or just dislike you and reject those morals.
The obvious counter ones are radical Muslims who don't think the western world should even exist..and would take much glee in seeing westerners slaughtered, raped and tortured…to them that's morally the right thing to do…and western society to them is morally corrupt.
I'm speaking only of the potential for universal acceptance of any moral code. All it takes is for everyone to believe it is universally applicable for it to become so. And all it takes for it stop being universally applicable is for someone to disagree. I'm with you that morality is totally subjective if you keep reading that post. :p -
2018-07-16 at 8:36 PM UTC in [Serious] Pedosexuality
Originally posted by Sophie A set of morals doesn't require a divine mandate to be universally applicable. All we need is reason.
Pretty much any set of morals CAN be universally applicable. Whether or not yours SHOULD be pretty much boils down to divine mandate. For as much as justice systems try to be beacons of rationality, it basically comes down to what people prioritize subjectively. For example there's a totally rational argument for killing criminals instead of keeping them alive - "good" people shouldn't have to pay to keep criminals alive in jail for the rest of their lives. Depending on whether you prioritize the wellbeing of the non-criminal taxpayers or the "sanctity of human life" (not exactly a rational belief), it would be totally rational to abolish the death penalty OR to enforce it far more broadly, so criminals only cost the good taxpayers the price of a single bullet.
I don't think there's any way that rationality can generate a universally agreeable list of priorities or especially justify the sanctity of life.
