Originally posted by Kafka
It's so fucked and what's worse is there seems to be a lot of impressionable people here dragged in to thinking it's normal like Kinks or because their own parents weren't around like Lanny being allowed on Totse at 15 so he turns a blind eye because that's all he knows. I'm so glad I didn't migrate to the internet until I was 19, I remember what being normal was like.
tbf i think the internet was fundamentally a different beast back when we were all on totse, and that it honestly wasn't that fucked up. sure totse was a wretched hive of scum and villainy, but like... it was moderated semi-strictly. i don't think it's weird full stop to interact with minors in a group setting like a forum, and that was pretty much the extent of the internet once upon a time.
but like... these days... grooming your 14 year old discord kittens and stalking them on facebook is an everyday activity for some of these mfs, apparently.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Lanny
Damn, so no sexy lumberjacks? Sounds like SF wins again
SF's sexy lumberjacks are mere shadows cast on the wall of the American cave system - shadows created by the brilliant rainbow incandescence of Canada's overwhelming innate homosexuality and abundance of natural resources.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by ⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀⠀
In the mob, room temperature means dead.
yes, this is because metabolism ceases once you perish meaning the average homeotherm will no-longer be warmer than the ambient temperature of their environment. when you kill somebody, within a day the body will have cooled (or warmed!) to the temperature of its surroundings ie 'room temperature'. to make somebody room temperature, therefore, would imply you mean to kill them (else put them out in the cold for a very precise length of time, so that upon re-entering the 'room' their body will be - at least to the touch - 'room temperature'). thank you, special.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Pretty sure the common concern for gun-interested but very hesitant liberals is the threat they pose to themselves on a bad day. Locking the gun up in 3 parts and 3 separate safes is a terrible idea if you want it for home defense but it's a great idea if you want it for plinking and you're the kind of person who's likely to come home from work one day, have a mental breakdown, and eat the fucker.
(This isn't me shit talking pansy liberals: if I was to get a gun this is pretty much my thought process - I don't particularly want/feel I need one for defense, but a range toy and a self-defense weapon are both equally capable of unaliving me if the mood strikes and the mood has struck once or twice before. If I'd had a gun at the time I wouldn't be writing this.)
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Yes. Generally I would say the international community as a whole should intervene (be it by economic sanctions or militarily, or both) to prevent genocides from taking place. To be "permitted" is to not be interfered with. The Irish should also be permitted to genocide the brits.
The redskins shouldn't be permitted to genocide me though.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
