The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Malice
To be fair, you could probably save a lot of lives with a million dollars. There could easily be a net gain.
which korz explicitly said he was not going to do, instead sinking it into a hotdog stand investment of all things
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
you will never have a "good" child Bill Krozby, you may have some sequence of bastards you abandon shortly after birth and who will surely live horrible lives because of you, but the fact that you lack the most basic parental sense speaks volumes to your total inability to successfully raise a child, any child, if you'd kill your own for money.
I used to shit on you for not being a part of your daughter's life. Now I think it's good, the less she sees of you the better off she'll be. Her life will be measurably better on the day you die, which, god willing, will be soon.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Bill Krozby is human scum, pure and simple.
Rapist, would-be child murder, he just needs to add torture to his resume to round it out. The again, maybe that's what him posting here is: an attempt to torture any and all unfortunate enough to read his posts.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
this is a rainbow thread faggots, be sure to keep on topic or else
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Bill Krozby
Source?!
how about multiple women accusing you of rape.
You are a rapist.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Honestly zok would have killed it with the ladies in college if he wasn't in the incel major. Or if he didn't have autism, you know, whatever.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
and zok and vladdy at some renaissance fair
kek
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Enter
you sir, are a RAPER
I can't not read it in the voice
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Malice
No, I’m just high and wanted to post a thought I had. I want to tone down the trolling, as I don’t want people to have that perception that I’m overly aggressive and insane.
typically one wants to consider this before posting about how autists are the ubermensch
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
midterms pending and construction hasn't even started. Who could have seen that coming?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Daily
Why are people like you drawn to animes? Could you break it down psychologically?
Because it's the most refined form of capitalist art. Nothing is off the table in anime, if it will sell someone will make an anime out of it. As attested to by the spree of incest anime being put out in the main stream by big name studios in the last several years. It is the artform that has finally managed to eliminate the single thing that makes art oil to capitalism's water: the artist. Anime is created by massive deeply pipelined and heavily parallelized teams, all artistic authority is vested in a committee which is fairly directly accountable to stockholders. None of the people involved in creating modern anime are irreplaceable. There are minor exceptions in big name directors and mangaka but even these vestiages are being shed as non-adapted anime are increasingly successful and the number of anime with a singular name attached to them has been steadily declining.
Wresting creative control from individuals has enabled incredible new levels of cross selling that's rivaled in the west perhaps only by the starwars memorabilia industry. It also facilitates trend riding, historically inserting a popular thing of the moment into a work would be resisted by an artist as it would date their work but art-by-committee is unconcerned with legacy. And secondary markets are better represented: singular authors are usually only aware of their primary market if they see their work as being specifically pitched to a market at all. With diverse representation in committee it's now not unheard of for a series to make more money outside of Japan than in.
It is the pinnacle of free market entertainment, and western devils can but sit and marvel at the well oiled capitalistic machine which generates it.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by -SpectraL
It's just common sense that if you start taking a bunch of mind-altering drugs, you'll eventually start hearing voices in your head and end up killing someone. Even a two-year-old should be able to figure that one out, but nope.
wrong
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by stupid noob
Raise your hand if you have a firm grasp on the pharmacological effects of these drugs. No? Then shut the fuck up retards.
Why don't you share what you think the pharmacological effects of SSRIs are?
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-02-14 at 2:47 AM UTC
in
People Don't Like Me
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
Originally posted by Open Your Mind
I just think that's what people mean when they talk about free will. They talk about how they could have acted differently than they did in the past. They say they feel like they are the conscious source of their thoughts and actions. Obviously that feeling is an illusion.
Who says they are the conscious source of their thoughts? I don't think any claims exclusive executive domain the contents of their minds, simple sense perception (which we clearly are not in total control of) is an immediate counter example. A claim that one "could have acted differently in the past" could either mean having the compatibilist freedom to have done differently (being able to act according to one's will, has one's will been different) or simply an uncritical colloquial expression.
There's a really interesting paper in 2005 that tried to find out what people do mean when they talk about free will using responses to some cases that don't implicate the linguistic issue here. The whole thing is interesting but the gist of it is on page 556 (6th page in the pdf):
https://philpapers.org/archive/NADSFF.pdfAnd it suggests that people do actually accept the compatibilist notion of free will when examining these cases.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
2018-02-16 at 11:10 PM UTC
in
Ｉｔ＇ｓ Ｆｒｉｄａｙ！！
Originally posted by A College Professor
what are u listening about
computational biology, it's actually pretty interesting it's just sitting on my ass for 6 hours with like a 10 minute break is kinda harsh.
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
The following users say it would be alright if the author of this
post didn't die in a fire!
