data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c068/3c06838e8b1ba4e9cd9b01f8786155dc10257c2c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6cbce/6cbce102483a29ef6cc1dfc1d032159bc316d578" alt=""
User Controls
Posts by Lanny
-
2016-10-26 at 1:51 AM UTC in My daughter turned 4 a couple days ago
I thought it was pretty cute, to be honest, but you you would never know anything about something like that.
That's probably because you're the kind of person who would take a job with a chukee cheese with the intent to defraud it for a free birthday party for your daughter you refuse to support. -
2016-10-26 at 1:04 AM UTC in I will no longer be posting on this website.
Bump for the greatest thread on niggas
I don't know, the §m£ÂgØL impersonator one was a pretty good followup -
2016-10-26 at 1:01 AM UTC in My daughter turned 4 a couple days ago
There is just something unimaginably depressing about that video. -
2016-10-25 at 4:28 PM UTC in Well I guess I'm back
You know, that's probably exactly why he hates himself so much. Remember… the "I'm a woman for 10 friggin' years" card plays into this as well.
I wasn't going to reply to Bill Krozby because he's so bad at insulting people it's not even fun but it looks like someone else has gotten a little salty -
2016-10-25 at 7:43 AM UTC in So Trump's gonna lose right?
He's only going to lose if the Democrats get away with the election fraud they got cooking.
Yeah mang, if the most controversial presidential candidate of this century doesn't win office surely it will have been for DNC voter fraud. There's absolutely no other conceivable explanation for such a turn of events. I can't even imagine another reason why something like that might happen. -
2016-10-25 at 5:48 AM UTC in Well I guess I'm back
yeah you were fat then, even malice made a comment about that weird scarf/glasses picture and said something about how it was gonna hurt and you got all strange and said you dgaf or soemthing, I may have been heavily into opiates then but I can suprislingly rember something, sorry for the porr grammar but im drunk now.
and not to be rude.. but your work whatever it is you do again.. needs to get a new scale , what do u do work at a gym or something? you look similar to pat, so probably around 245-258
no need to front lanny.
Lol, I'll freely admit I have the level of general physical fitness of a jellyfish and I've definitely been heavier than I should be at various points but I'm confident I've never weighed more than 200 pounds. -
2016-10-25 at 4:42 AM UTC in hot shitRemember, soliciting or distributing child pornography is a crime.
Remember, pedophiles get raped, beaten, and murdered in jail. -
2016-10-25 at 3:50 AM UTC in The retarded thread: Fuck, §m£ÂgØL made one first edition"it is it is"
-
2016-10-25 at 2:16 AM UTC in Well I guess I'm back
I saw one of you on rdfrn… which was hardly years ago where you had a very close cut shaved haircut and i think you were wearing a scarf..
And plenty of people have seen me strip on tinychat and can attest to me having a develishly sexy figure. But yeah lanny why don't you ever go on tc anymore? You did for a little bit… *shrug*
That was like, a year ago. Was I fat then? I don't think so. I don't know why I never go on tc anymore, just not in the mood most days I guess.Hey, Lan Lan, I've wondered this before but have never seen you mention it, how much do you weigh?
I don't weigh myself often since it is what it is. There's a scale at work which reports I'm 166. -
2016-10-24 at 4:28 PM UTC in Well I guess I'm back
Bill Krozby is right, I've seen a picture of you. And you could definitely stand to lose a few pounds or get a trendy heroin addiction. How old are you by the way?
Ho, you saw a picture of me years ago, you don't know me!
But yeah, I'm an alcoholic with a desk job and whose hobbies all include sitting still for long periods of time, yall expecting adonis? Why don't you post a picture and we can all marvel at the sculpted nature of your figure. -
2016-10-24 at 6:41 AM UTC in Anybody here remember Hand of Zek?(are you scared yet?)
-
2016-10-24 at 6:41 AM UTC in Anybody here remember Hand of Zek?TRANSPHOBIA
-
2016-10-24 at 6:41 AM UTC in Anybody here remember Hand of Zek?actually I would be sure, I'm like 99% sure zek has posted post-zoklet
-
2016-10-24 at 6:40 AM UTC in Anybody here remember Hand of Zek?I wouldn't be so sure
-
2016-10-24 at 6:37 AM UTC in Well I guess I'm backBill Krozby quick, call 911 and ask for an ambulance and fire truck because you just got a sick burn yo
-
2016-10-24 at 6:31 AM UTC in LannySo there's a few things to say here. By far the most important is this: I'm severely dissapointed that databitches.net chose to go with "another forum elsewhere", I really would have liked to see "Niggas In Space" in print, or at least web-print. What pussies.
Now I could be wrong, convinced by someone that's upset with Lanny, trying to sabotage Lanny's reputation and commitment to this community. So don't get upset Lanny and take this as an attack, and don't think that I'm personally trying to stir up shit, because I'm not.
No worries blood, you should be suspect of me, just in general, as a provider of a web service. There should be nothing I can say at this point that would make you trust me, if there is then you're too easily convinced. You should post under the assumption that the DB is an open book for law enforcement. That's safer for you, and it's safer for me.3. I was told that alone would be enough to get a subpena/warrant for this website.
It might be sufficient grounds to secure a warrant to seize the server or requisition data from it but LE would have to go through the process to do it. If they have better leads (likely, if this guy was for real I'm sure he didn't post from his home IP which is the extent of my records) there would be no point, there's probably one nigga buried under a mountain of cases who's following up on this, investigations cost money thus kept as brief as possible.I just want to hear from you, what happened with this incident?
Were you contacted?
I wasn't, as I recall the guy posted something and it was some dinky XSS attack that could like maybe skim a few people's CCNs? This is the first I heard of anything more significant than that. Realize of course that court orders can come with a gag condition and I might be legally compelled not to reveal anything about the matter, but then I probably wouldn't mention that if it were the case, a fact that may be worth remembering if you believe me now.
This is a good time to reiterate my policy on the law as it pertains to this forum: I will not risk my freedom because of someone else's OP sec. I won't go above and beyond my legal duty to report or prevent crime, I won't stop posters from incriminating themselves because that devolves into rule lawyering quickly, but I will comply 100% with law enforcement. I may employ whatever legal strategy is available to me to yield as little information as possible, you can challenge a subpoena but short of turning it into a publicity case for the EFF or something my legal resources are pretty limited. I'm not a fed (although I have been a state employee, and have worked on internet fraud prevention projects in the finance industry for whatever that's worth) but it might be worth assuming I am when you ask yourself "should I be posting this?". -
2016-10-24 at 5:50 AM UTC in Well I guess I'm back
Nobody broke any rules, dummkopf. Both bans were unjustified and you know it. The truth is, you just can't take it. As for the arena, I'm sure that's very convenient for you.
That's a lie, but I point again to the fact that I was talking about something bigger (miraculously) than your ego on internet forums. -
2016-10-23 at 6:45 PM UTC in Any male who uses this "emoji" is a piece of shit.It's the fucking nips man, blame it on them
-
2016-10-23 at 6:45 PM UTC in Well I guess I'm back
But we won't name names or anything. ;)
I mean yes, getting banned from an internet forum for breaking the rules is one of many ways in which deviancy is punished. I'd like to think we both have the perspective to realize internet forum politics weren't really the arena I was addressing. -
2016-10-23 at 7:04 AM UTC in Well I guess I'm back
[greentext]>implying you need alcohol to overcome bullshit social rituals[/greentext]
You just need to be rude. Or make the silly social ritual somehow more interesting through your wit.
When you're rude you lose out economically. The modern world is very good at shutting out people who are more forceful than is proscribed, or more generally those who deviate from some set of norms. You can't be a psychopath and economically successful but in very few situations, all of which are almost certainly bared to you (to basically everyone). That's the truly sinister dimension our society, it is not an impartial exchange of labor for fluid wealth. It is instead a game whereby the winning tactic is exclusively participation in it. What might one do to then to extract the benefits of playing the society-game well while not lowering oneself to an acceptance of the ideals successful play entail? You can go off and be a hermit, but this deprives one of the society-game's winnings, one can play earnestly but this is loss because it implies surrender of the self to successful value-set. What then of behaviors that involve action which appears to be in accordance with the society-game's victory conditions and yet does not subjugate the participant? One can imagine some approaches, I advance merely that alcoholism is one of them. It's engaging in the society game, playing it as a game, and yet holding it ever at arm's length: you can present the aspect of participation and yet reject it in your heart. When you're stumbling through the economic process shitfaced you say, at least to yourself, "this is not worth sobriety" and in so doing cast the absurd contrast the seperates the game-player from the earnest participant. The villainy of our society is not the extraction of labor but the process of coercing buy-in, heart and soul, of participants; thus any avenue which can both succeed in the game-playing dimension and yet fail in the intended internal-state dimension is an act of defiant heroism. Refusal to be marginalized simultaneous with refusal to allow internal states to be governed. This is the means of revolt of the alcoholic, the heroism of the drunk, the refusal to be bowed by those proud denizens of the gutter.