User Controls
This Is What You Get With Diversity.
-
2017-11-22 at 3:05 AM UTC
-
2017-11-22 at 3:31 AM UTC
-
2017-11-22 at 3:31 AM UTC
-
2017-11-22 at 4:02 AM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist go on then, haiti, what's your point?
.
Its a shithole. Just like South Africa, Sudan, Nigeria, Detroit, the South Side of Chicago and any other place on the planet ran by niggers.
The African continent has more coastline than any other continent and yet no African (ran by niggers) nation has ever fielded a Navy worth a shit. Hell the best 5 African navies are South Africa, Algeria, Egypt, Libya, and Morocco. These are only rank 4 navies which are defined as follows.These are navies possessing the ability to project force into the adjoining ocean basin. While they may have the capacity to exercise these further afield, for whatever reason, they do not do so on a regular basis.
None of these 5 nations were built by niggers. But there navies still suck. Wanna know why? Because niggers. They all have way too many niggers in the navy. -
2017-11-22 at 4:29 AM UTC
-
2017-11-22 at 5:05 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Its a shithole. Just like South Africa, Sudan, Nigeria, Detroit, the South Side of Chicago and any other place on the planet ran by niggers.
The African continent has more coastline than any other continent and yet no African (ran by niggers) nation has ever fielded a Navy worth a shit. Hell the best 5 African navies are South Africa, Algeria, Egypt, Libya, and Morocco. These are only rank 4 navies which are defined as follows.
None of these 5 nations were built by niggers. But there navies still suck. Wanna know why? Because niggers. They all have way too many niggers in the navy.
niggerville technically doesnt start until south of the sahara desert. thats why they call it 'sub saharan africa'
the n.african countries are handsome and well tanned individuals but a degree of improvement over niggers. -
2017-11-22 at 5:06 AM UTC
-
2017-11-22 at 5:16 AM UTC
-
2017-11-22 at 5:25 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock niggerville technically doesnt start until south of the sahara desert. thats why they call it 'sub saharan africa'
the n.african countries are handsome and well tanned individuals but a degree of improvement over niggers.
The niggers still get up north. They spread everywhere they go like mold. -
2017-11-22 at 5:27 AM UTCPopping in again to remind you Jill is an inferior victimized loser scared of pigmentation.
-
2017-11-22 at 5:32 AM UTCpigmentation is scary though
imagine waking up albino -
2017-11-22 at 5:35 AM UTC
-
2017-11-22 at 5:36 AM UTClooks like he walked into a plastic surgeon's office with a printout of trollface.jpg
-
2017-11-22 at 5:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by Number13 The declining influence bit? Purely by the fact that as a country is filled with non natives it's overall ideas and ideals shift, to give a recent example look at brexit, the majority of scotland voted to remain within the eu but as scotland is a part of britain it had to be held to the majority decision even beyond it's borders.
It's the same within a single country, if a state is invaded by foreigners at some point the foreigners will be the majority and will decide for the country, it has happened, is happening and I'd prefer it didn't.
Non whites within the government of a majority white country is an attack on the influence of whites, we've seen though that whites in a non white countries government works but is neither here nor there because it's not a declining influence thing.
And I'm not sure I understand your question if it's about the economic bit because murder, assault and rape are not methods of gaining economic standing unless being payed to do so.
You could claim the first 2 as a result of robbery and such but you forget the fact that there are plenty of nonviolent but still illegal means of gaining money, as well of course as legal work.
Meaning lack of intelligence to commit the nonviolent crimes or a predisposition to violence.
And you might not have claimed this but you said that you believe it correlates with poverty which I addressed in my post, rates of poverty even with a margin did not account for rates of crimes, not all of them.
Unless, like I said, you hold blacks and whites to different standards.
And Narcs reply didn't address anything perfectly, whites committed more crimes overall because they are 72% of the population of the US.
For some percentage statistics of crimes, once again from https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2013/crime-in-the-u.s.-2013/tables/table-43
Murder and nonnegligent manslaughter W45.3% B52.2%
Rape W66.2% B31.3%
Robbery W41.9% B56.4%
Aggravated assault W62.9% B33.9%
Burglary W67.5% B30.4%
Larceny-theft W68.3% B28.7%
and it goes on
You'll notice that the majority of the white percentages of overall crime mostly hover around 60-70% and 70% of the population committing 70% of the crime is understandable and logical, can you agree there? It's pure percentages
But 13% of the population committing 30% or more of the crime doesn't conform to that logic.
This has been my entire point and it cannot be refuted regardless of their reasons.
I plainly said I don't know why they do it and it was in reply to your question, just your muh slavery muh poor slop doesn't sit right with me, why do I have to have a reason for them to be committing crimes? so you can say it's understandable why they do it? so you can use it as an excuse to sweep it under the rug? I don't have a reason for why whites commit crimes but I'm not trying to explain them or excuse them.
Slavery and racism against asians was and is real in the us, I used the internment camps as an example because it's one that people that are still alive or were recently alive lived through and yet they don't do the same as blacks, there's no asian version of detroit.
No one alive was involved in the US slave trade as merchant or merchandise.
First of all, I am racist, openly.
Second of all is that the english language is read left to right which is an important thing to keep in mind for my post(the quote above) up to the point of that post I had not said anyone was superior or inferior, and once again I was replying to you, please do read what you have said so that you don't misconstrue what I'm saying.
I don't know what to say to this, my opinion changes when adequate and verifiable information is considered, none of you have provided that so far so I'm unsure why you brought this up, I've used sourced statistics, you have used supposition.
aren't you an incel in the uk that lives with his parents because you had a mental break down?
\
Post last edited by Bill Krozby at 2017-11-22T05:42:41.909470+00:00 -
2017-11-22 at 5:53 AM UTC
-
2017-11-22 at 6:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by Totse 2001 Her dad is probably going to be in your closet one night, waiting for you to fall asleep.
I can't go into any other details.. to disturbing.
LOL. Just joking. That nigga died last year of a heart attack and her mom as been an MIA crackhead virtually since she was born. -
2017-11-22 at 10:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock thats for you to tell me.
tell me some things about haiti. its history. current events. its demographic and population. its society and social norms. its economy…internal infrastructure…and trade. the government functionality.
go.
no its not for me to tell you, you pulled it up to use as an argument, so explain your point. otherwise it isn't one, its just the name of a country and has no relevance to this argument.
Originally posted by infinityshock youve literally avoided everything ive posted and focused on the fucking word 'statistics' that you have some sort of fetish with.
here. one, single example… something simple to keep your handsome and well tanned individual liserd-brain from imploding due to mental overload:
HAITI.
go. -
2017-11-22 at 10:12 AM UTC
Originally posted by aldra That doesn't really affect the statistics unless there's a major disparity between the number of multiple charges or number of repeat offences between different racial groups.
With statistics how they are, assuming that an average of 5 of each recorded white-perpetrated offence is committed by a single criminal and 5 of each recorded black-perpetrated offence is committed by a single criminal, the ratio of offences and criminals per capita remains the same. The only way that you could argue that the 'blacks are statistically more violent' claim is invalid is if you could show that they're far more likely to receive multiple charges or far more likely to reoffend - indicating that the recorded charges are spread among a much smaller group. I don't think statistics are gathered in that level of detail though.
Lopht is right that black males 15-30 or so are responsible for extremely high numbers of offences, making women and older people look bad, but I'd argue that the same thing probably happens in other racial groups too - males in that age range are more likely to commit crimes, specifically violent crimes than any other demographic (race aside).
no it doesn't change anything. it seriously disputes the claim that 6 out of 10 black people are criminals, which is what the racists have been using as the basis of their argument.
. -
2017-11-22 at 10:17 AM UTCwow ppl get old and die shitting themselfs sometimes he had his chance to achieve greatness
-
2017-11-22 at 11:37 AM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist no it doesn't change anything. it seriously disputes the claim that 6 out of 10 black people are criminals, which is what the racists have been using as the basis of their argument.
how do you know for sure ???? do you have access to american niggers ????
or them access to you ???
i dont have access to niggers so I based my claim on the knowledge that out of every 10 famous nigger actors i remember,
6 of them were famous for having portrayed, or are synonymous with black criminals.
my case, i rest it here.
.