User Controls
This Is What You Get With Diversity.
-
2017-11-21 at 6:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist we're not claiming the percentages are the same etc. the point we are making is that there is still enough of white people committing the same acts that white people have no business looking down their noses at black people for doing the same things. even considering the ratio's, more of the crimes were still committed by white people overall.
.
Pics or it didn't happen nigger. -
2017-11-21 at 6:43 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 6:56 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 6:57 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 7:34 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 7:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader so like out of 10 negros you met 9 of them are out to get you ????
either you live in bad neighborhood or your a crime magnet.
interesting assumption considering that is nowhere close to anything ive ever said or even insinuated.
gives an interesting view into your thought process.
there is one nigger in my neighborhood and he lives with his fatass white sugar momma.
additionally...in my entire life I have never been in a physical altercation with a nigger where i didnt win. the closest was a draw.
ive posted several of the physical interactions ive had with niggers over the years on totse...rdfrn...totse2...skankery...here... -
2017-11-21 at 8:04 PM UTC
Originally posted by benny vader nah, its you who couldnt correlate.
when and if 6 out of every 10 niggers you met are criminals hell bent to crime the shit out of you as the statistic had shown …. and yet you do not think every nigger you come into contact with as a clear and present threat and fear them, then your meant to undergo that process that darwin observed and coined.
.
Originally posted by infinityshock if you're using statistics…more accurate numbers would be 9 out of 9.5.
where exactly do you get these figures from you dumbasses? you seem pretty sure on those exact figures for black people being criminals. i'm interested in how you came to those conclusions.
. -
2017-11-21 at 8:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock interesting assumption considering that is nowhere close to anything ive ever said or even insinuated.
gives an interesting view into your thought process.
there is one nigger in my neighborhood and he lives with his fatass white sugar momma.
additionally…in my entire life I have never been in a physical altercation with a nigger where i didnt win. the closest was a draw.
ive posted several of the physical interactions ive had with niggers over the years on totse…rdfrn…totse2…skankery…here…
so if thats the case where then do the statistics you quoted are valid ??? -
2017-11-21 at 8:41 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 8:43 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 8:44 PM UTCgandu ur nan fatThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-11-21 at 8:45 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 8:46 PM UTChttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias,[Note 1] is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.[1] It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. Confirmation bias is a variation of the more general tendency of apophenia.
People also tend to interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing position. Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain attitude polarization (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), belief perseverance (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series) and illusory correlation (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations).
A series of psychological experiments in the 1960s suggested that people are biased toward confirming their existing beliefs. Later work re-interpreted these results as a tendency to test ideas in a one-sided way, focusing on one possibility and ignoring alternatives. In certain situations, this tendency can bias people's conclusions. Explanations for the observed biases include wishful thinking and the limited human capacity to process information. Another explanation is that people show confirmation bias because they are weighing up the costs of being wrong, rather than investigating in a neutral, scientific way.
Confirmation biases contribute to overconfidence in personal beliefs and can maintain or strengthen beliefs in the face of contrary evidence. Poor decisions due to these biases have been found in political and organizational contexts.[2][3]
. -
2017-11-21 at 8:47 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist so no valid statistics then or anything, just the perceptions of an out and out racist? seems legit.
you are fucking retarded. scroll back to the specific examples and factual cases ive posted about to establish the fact that my position is the correct and accurate one. stop focusing on statistics because youre not going to get any successful points established by going the usual retard-route by swishing them around to suit your mentally deficient thought process. -
2017-11-21 at 8:47 PM UTC
-
2017-11-21 at 8:49 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
bias this, handsome and well tanned individual:
haiti
detroit
the top ten list of most dangerous cities in the US
rhodesia
south africa
every predominantly-handsome and well tanned individual neighborhood in the US
the US prison system
those are facts, fuckface, go interpret them -
2017-11-21 at 8:54 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock bias this, handsome and well tanned individual:
haiti
detroit
the top ten list of most dangerous cities in the US
rhodesia
south africa
every predominantly-handsome and well tanned individual neighborhood in the US
the US prison system
those are facts, fuckface, go interpret them
they are not facts, just a list of places which somehow in your pea sized brain have misinterpreted to mean something. see the explanation of confirmation bias which i already posted above, but here it is again in case you have trouble understanding the scroll bar function.
Originally posted by NARCassist https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias
Confirmation bias, also called confirmatory bias or myside bias,[Note 1] is the tendency to search for, interpret, favor, and recall information in a way that confirms one's preexisting beliefs or hypotheses.[1] It is a type of cognitive bias and a systematic error of inductive reasoning. People display this bias when they gather or remember information selectively, or when they interpret it in a biased way. The effect is stronger for emotionally charged issues and for deeply entrenched beliefs. Confirmation bias is a variation of the more general tendency of apophenia.
People also tend to interpret ambiguous evidence as supporting their existing position. Biased search, interpretation and memory have been invoked to explain attitude polarization (when a disagreement becomes more extreme even though the different parties are exposed to the same evidence), belief perseverance (when beliefs persist after the evidence for them is shown to be false), the irrational primacy effect (a greater reliance on information encountered early in a series) and illusory correlation (when people falsely perceive an association between two events or situations).
A series of psychological experiments in the 1960s suggested that people are biased toward confirming their existing beliefs. Later work re-interpreted these results as a tendency to test ideas in a one-sided way, focusing on one possibility and ignoring alternatives. In certain situations, this tendency can bias people's conclusions. Explanations for the observed biases include wishful thinking and the limited human capacity to process information. Another explanation is that people show confirmation bias because they are weighing up the costs of being wrong, rather than investigating in a neutral, scientific way.
Confirmation biases contribute to overconfidence in personal beliefs and can maintain or strengthen beliefs in the face of contrary evidence. Poor decisions due to these biases have been found in political and organizational contexts.[2][3]
.
. -
2017-11-21 at 8:59 PM UTC
Originally posted by NARCassist they are not facts, just a list of places which somehow in your pea sized brain have misinterpreted to mean something. see the explanation of confirmation bias which i already posted above, but here it is again in case you have trouble understanding the scroll bar function
this is why youre full-retarded.
i post examples why handsome and well tanned individuals are wholly incompatible with civilized existence and incapable of functioning in a civilization and youre mentally incapable of grasping such a simple concept.
this it nothing surprising and to be expected since youve previously admitted to being a handsome and well tanned individual yourself. you contribute to the general factual observation that handsome and well tanned individuals are inferior in every higher thought process.
now stfu and go chase a banana, you stupid fucking monkey. -
2017-11-21 at 9:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock this is why youre full-retarded.
i post examples why handsome and well tanned individuals are wholly incompatible with civilized existence and incapable of functioning in a civilization and youre mentally incapable of grasping such a simple concept.
this it nothing surprising and to be expected since youve previously admitted to being a handsome and well tanned individual yourself. you contribute to the general factual observation that handsome and well tanned individuals are inferior in every higher thought process.
now stfu and go chase a banana, you stupid fucking monkey.
you really do make this easy finny
. -
2017-11-21 at 10:17 PM UTC
