User Controls

Can you get your head around the vastness of nothing?

  1. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Originally posted by Narc Well its definitely a fact that it happened once. If it happened a second time or more and didn't die out almost immediately then we'd have life here on earth that wouldn't be genetically linked to allother life on earth. So far DNA fingerprinting has not found a single shred of evidence for this.

    So can you show otherwise, or is what you said just the jabberings of an idiot?


    .


    .

  2. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    My other theory is that our universe is an atom, one of many that makes up another universe which is also one of many atoms that makes up another universe. and that the multiverse is literally that every universe is an atom and they are all nested within a multitude of never ending universes that are all atoms, all making up other universes that never end making up other universes which are all atoms making up other universes. And that nesting of atom/universes never ends, just keeps going on infinitely making up other universes.


    .
  3. Originally posted by ORACLE It is where you pose your conclusion as part of your premises and begin by assuming what you're trying to argue.

    There is no notion of "an electron not moving" if the universe is not on "pause". It only makes sense if you look at an instant in time. In that instant, the properties you will calculate for it will inherently contain equations of motion that will translate it during the next instant.

    So no shit, if you pause time and look at an instant, then there is no flow of time. D U H. But not only does time still exist, it is implied in the properties of the instant. O can explain this further if you'd like.

    Another thing to consider is some basic quantum mechanical principles. I'm assuming you know some algebra.

    The equation for Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is like

    (Ux)(Up)≥(Hbar)/2

    Where Ux is the uncertainty in position X and Up is uncertainty in momentum p, and hbar is Planck's constant.

    Don't worry about Planck's constant. It's just a proportionality constant.

    You can treat the ≥ like a =

    Now try dividing both sides by either Ux or Up to isolate one term on the left. See what that does to the relationship between Ux and Up?

    Then think about what would happen to Ux if you froze time. See how that affects Up? What does that tell you?

    i think you misconcepted what i said.

    i said if nothing moves, time will be at a stand still. i didnt say stopping time will cause everything in the universe to stop.
  4. Originally posted by Narc Well its definitely a fact that it happened once. If it happened a second time or more and didn't die out almost immediately then we'd have life here on earth that wouldn't be genetically linked to allother life on earth. So far DNA fingerprinting has not found a single shred of evidence for this.

    So can you show otherwise, or is what you said just the jabberings of an idiot?


    .


    .

    i'd like to see what genetical similarities between you and anaerobic baterias that feed on sulfurs.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  5. Originally posted by Obbe That is 100% imagination.

    *takes notes*
  6. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i'd like to see what genetical similarities between you and anaerobic baterias that feed on sulfurs.

    Carbon based lifeforms

    Convert food to adenosine triphosphate for energy

    Undergoing mitosis

    Both write literotica about 8 year old neighbor girls

    Etc
  7. Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Carbon based lifeforms

    Convert food to adenosine triphosphate for energy

    Undergoing mitosis

    Both write literotica about 8 year old neighbor girls

    Etc

    C.

    low effort post.
  8. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i think you misconcepted what i said.

    i said if nothing moves, time will be at a stand still. i didnt say stopping time will cause everything in the universe to stop.

    What I am saying is that you are essentially making that statement by even saying "if everything stopped moving". If you say "the electrons stopped moving", you're basically making a meaningless statement by itself unless you mean that the clock has been stopped to enable you to do so. There's no such thing otherwise. Every instant implies change in itself intrinsically. There is state of function. And equation of change for function. That's it. Period. You can not move at all and still keep moving in time because time is not dependent on movement, that's just measurement on your personal part. Movement is dependent on time. The entire concept of Velocity is defined entirely in terms of time and position. Velocity = rate of change of displacement. Rate of change = change per unit time.
  9. Originally posted by ORACLE What I am saying is that you are essentially making that statement by even saying "if everything stopped moving". If you say "the electrons stopped moving", you're basically making a meaningless statement by itself unless you mean that the clock has been stopped to enable you to do so. There's no such thing otherwise. Every instant implies change in itself intrinsically. There is state of function. And equation of change for function. That's it. Period. You can not move at all and still keep moving in time because time is not dependent on movement, that's just measurement on your personal part. Movement is dependent on time. The entire concept of Velocity is defined entirely in terms of time and position. Velocity = rate of change of displacement. Rate of change = change per unit time.

    yes it is. time is totally dependent on movement.

    look at a still image or pictures. no movements, no time, and because a picture doesnt have any movements, time is at a stand still at the moment the shutter clicks.
  10. Originally posted by vindicktive vinny C.

    low effort post.

    I guess we share 50 percent of our DNA with bananas because God amirite
  11. Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace I guess we share 50 percent of our DNA with bananas because God amirite

    I've shared 100% of mine with your mom.
  12. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    Originally posted by vindicktive vinny yes it is. time is totally dependent on movement.

    look at a still image or pictures. no movements, no time, and because a picture doesnt have any movements, time is at a stand still at the moment the shutter clicks.

    Nope. Nothing inconceivable with a universe with nothing moving where the time axis keeps progressing and all states are identical. Position in time itself is an informational aspect. If there is a difference in interval then that's an informational matter whether anything is moving or not.
  13. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]
    Holy shit, all the atoms in your body laid end to end would stretch for 32 light years.

    LIKE WHAT DA FUK? You could be stretched out to proxima centuri and back 4 times.




    .
  14. ORACLE Naturally Camouflaged
    I'll stretch your mom's pussy to Andromeda faggot
  15. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson I've shared 100% of mine with your mom.

    Lame 7th grade tier joke
  16. Narc Space Nigga [connect my yokel-like scolytidae]



    .
  17. Obbe Alan What? [annoy my right-angled speediness]
    Can you wrap your head around the vastness of nothing... on salvia?
  18. Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Lame 7th grade tier joke

    Wasn't a joke, I really have...son
  19. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    If an object had no movement at all, it couldn't be made of matter, because all matter vibrates at the atomic level.
  20. Originally posted by Jiggaboo_Johnson Wasn't a joke, I really have…son

    Yawn
Jump to Top