User Controls
Can you get your head around the vastness of nothing?
-
2020-01-21 at 4:01 AM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 4:05 AM UTCThe inversion is true as well. There is infinite space and endless dimensional levels at the microscopic level, just as there are in the exterior world. The deeper you look, the more endless the space becomes. There's no end to it in either direction, only boundary markers, in an ever-changing dynamic engine.
-
2020-01-21 at 4:09 AM UTC
Originally posted by -SpectraL The inversion is true as well. There is infinite space and endless dimensional levels at the microscopic level, just as there are in the exterior world. The deeper you look, the more endless the space becomes. There's no end to it in either direction, only boundary markers, in an ever-changing dynamic engine.
Fluid, not static -
2020-01-21 at 4:38 AM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 6:58 AM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 7:01 AM UTCbunch of egg heads pulling their pud here getting all frothy at eachother about nothing *spins his fedora and blows sand in their eyes*
-
2020-01-21 at 7:09 AM UTCCan you get your head around how big my muscles are? Just good old fashioned american juice, oats, having sex and day drinking. Not to mention the cocaine JEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEERT!!
-
2020-01-21 at 10:24 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-01-21 at 10:25 AM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 10:36 AM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 11:24 AM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 11:30 AM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 11:35 AM UTCwhats circular reasoning ?
-
2020-01-21 at 12:10 PM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 1:42 PM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 4:49 PM UTC
-
2020-01-21 at 4:55 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2020-01-21 at 5:40 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny whats circular reasoning ?
It is where you pose your conclusion as part of your premises and begin by assuming what you're trying to argue.
There is no notion of "an electron not moving" if the universe is not on "pause". It only makes sense if you look at an instant in time. In that instant, the properties you will calculate for it will inherently contain equations of motion that will translate it during the next instant.
So no shit, if you pause time and look at an instant, then there is no flow of time. D U H. But not only does time still exist, it is implied in the properties of the instant. O can explain this further if you'd like.
Another thing to consider is some basic quantum mechanical principles. I'm assuming you know some algebra.
The equation for Heisenberg's uncertainty principle is like
(Ux)(Up)≥(Hbar)/2
Where Ux is the uncertainty in position X and Up is uncertainty in momentum p, and hbar is Planck's constant.
Don't worry about Planck's constant. It's just a proportionality constant.
You can treat the ≥ like a =
Now try dividing both sides by either Ux or Up to isolate one term on the left. See what that does to the relationship between Ux and Up?
Then think about what would happen to Ux if you froze time. See how that affects Up? What does that tell you? -
2020-01-21 at 5:45 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny yea like your single 'abionesis' is a proven fact.
Well its definitely a fact that it happened once. If it happened a second time or more and didn't die out almost immediately then we'd have life here on earth that wouldn't be genetically linked to allother life on earth. So far DNA fingerprinting has not found a single shred of evidence for this.
So can you show otherwise, or is what you said just the jabberings of an idiot?
.
. -
2020-01-21 at 5:46 PM UTCIf reality consisted of one object and that object could not move or do anything, is there a flow of time?
