User Controls
Would it make you gay to jack another dudes dick with a remote controlled hand?
-
2018-10-18 at 3:46 PM UTC
-
2018-10-18 at 5:43 PM UTC
Originally posted by MORALLY SUPERIOR BEING 2.0 - The GMO Reckoning Mosty guys and girls are bisexual to some degree or other. Like I'm disgusted by most guys, but I have met some guys who I definitely would have went to bed with, in a big way. Sadly the opportunity never arose, though that's mostly my fault I guess.
Gay is an identity. It's not "black" to do stereotypical black things, and it's not "jedi" to be careful with money and want to protect your own country.
I don't think there's anything "gay" about a man stroking cock, sucking cock, having sex with a guy, etc. It's just fun, and not something horrible to be stigmatised (unless STDs are involved, don't let some guy inject AIDS up your asshole, and especially don't bring the infection back to your gf/wife the way all the niggers in Africa do).
You're right that's not horrible or something bad. To each their own. But, you suck another man's penis and it's gay.
I mean, bro, that's gay.
Like you and a friend could be tag teaming a bitch and there's certain lines you don't cross. Like putting his cock in your mouth. Because it's gay. That's what makes it gay. So you don't do it. -
2018-10-18 at 6:30 PM UTC
-
2018-10-18 at 7:14 PM UTCOnly on Halloween and Labor day otherwise nah it's all good brah.
-
2018-10-18 at 9:19 PM UTCSuppose that I have a button which, if pressed, produces an orgasm in a random male somewhere on Earth. The target is different each time, and there is no downside other than the issue of one man creating pleasure in another. I would argue that there is literally no reason at all not to press this button as often as possible, and furthermore that it isn't gay no matter who is affected.
-
2018-10-18 at 9:21 PM UTCLol.
Creep shit.
Where that button came from tho? -
2018-10-18 at 9:22 PM UTCIt's a divine gift to humanity.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-10-18 at 10:38 PM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick Suppose that I have a button which, if pressed, produces an orgasm in a random male somewhere on Earth. The target is different each time, and there is no downside other than the issue of one man creating pleasure in another. I would argue that there is literally no reason at all not to press this button as often as possible, and furthermore that it isn't gay no matter who is affected.
only a faggot would think up such ridiculousness -
2018-10-18 at 10:50 PM UTC
-
2018-10-18 at 11:56 PM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick Suppose that I have a button which, if pressed, produces an orgasm in a random male somewhere on Earth. The target is different each time, and there is no downside other than the issue of one man creating pleasure in another. I would argue that there is literally no reason at all not to press this button as often as possible, and furthermore that it isn't gay no matter who is affected.
Just thinking that thought makes you gay. Posting it makes you a flaming goatse faggot. -
2018-10-18 at 11:58 PM UTCUr a virgin.
-
2018-10-19 at 12:39 AM UTC
Originally posted by infinityshock only a faggot would think up such ridiculousness
I can understand the suspicion that the creator of the button or maybe the person who presses it might each be conceived as gay, but surely the beneficiary can't be gay. This remotely provoked orgasm is essentially spontaneous to them. Is it gay to be spurned to orgasm by another man if you don't realize he's done it?
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Just thinking that thought makes you gay. Posting it makes you a flaming goatse faggot.
Maybe I'll make a special button just for you. -
2018-10-19 at 12:40 AM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick I can understand the suspicion that the creator of the button or maybe the person who presses it might each be conceived as gay, but surely the beneficiary can't be gay. This remotely provoked orgasm is essentially spontaneous to them.
Maybe I'll make a special button just for you.
Is that what your sister called you when she abused you? Her "special button"? -
2018-10-19 at 12:47 AM UTC
Originally posted by Speedy Parker Is that what your sister called you when she abused you? Her "special button"?
To be honest, I don't remember. I was a little kid at the time and there were a lot of names she called me. I don't mind talking about it, but you're decidedly off-topic in a discussion forum.
I think it's interesting that a written threat to your sexuality provokes an aggression response. It's almost as though you really think I'm capable of putting such a button together, rather than just being deliberate in refusing to answer a thought experiment that I can only think must be outside of your comprehension. Why don't you put this same energy into addressing my post thoughtfully? -
2018-10-19 at 12:50 AM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick To be honest, I don't remember. I was a little kid at the time and there were a lot of names she called me. I don't mind talking about it, but you're decidedly off-topic in a discussion forum.
I think it's interesting that a written threat to your sexuality provokes an aggression response. It's almost as though you really think I'm capable of putting such a button together, rather than just being deliberate in refusing to answer a thought experiment that I can only think must be outside of your comprehension. Why don't you put this same energy into addressing my post thoughtfully?
Because your premise is to stupid to deserve a response. Now be a good little "special button" and run off to report me. -
2018-10-19 at 12:51 AM UTCHow cruel would it be to have such a button exist, & refuse to use it?
-
2018-10-19 at 1:05 AM UTC
Originally posted by DontTellEm How cruel would it be to have such a button exist, & refuse to use it?
I agree with you! If you accept that it's preferable to do something that causes pleasure instead of not doing anything, then the existence of such a button would seemingly demand that it be pushed.
Furthermore, I think it's reasonable to assume that, for most ordinary people, the utility of this button would outweigh that of our other activities. You can offer more pleasure to the world by quitting your job, leaving your partner, and abdicating from social obligations and instead pushing the button a few more thousand times each day. -
2018-10-19 at 1:24 AM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick I can understand the suspicion that the creator of the button or maybe the person who presses it might each be conceived as gay, but surely the beneficiary can't be gay. This remotely provoked orgasm is essentially spontaneous to them. Is it gay to be spurned to orgasm by another man if you don't realize he's done it?
no...it has nothing to do with the scenario. it has to do with you thinking up the scenario in your faggot mind in the first place.
a straight heterosexual doesnt have the faggotry inclinations causing such thoughts to manifest in the first place. only a faggot, with faggot inclinations, and faggot desires, would have the faggot idea flowing through its faggot mind.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2018-10-19 at 1:26 AM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick To be honest, I don't remember. I was a little kid at the time and there were a lot of names she called me. I don't mind talking about it, but you're decidedly off-topic in a discussion forum.
I think it's interesting that a written threat to your sexuality provokes an aggression response. It's almost as though you really think I'm capable of putting such a button together, rather than just being deliberate in refusing to answer a thought experiment that I can only think must be outside of your comprehension. Why don't you put this same energy into addressing my post thoughtfully?
youre an idiot. this 'scenario' is just a means for you to come up with some faggot stimulation for your next fag-fapping session. like a perving nipponese wandering through a crowded bus full of women wearing dresses with a micro camera attached to his shoe. -
2018-10-19 at 1:27 AM UTC
Originally posted by Zanick I agree with you! If you accept that it's preferable to do something that causes pleasure instead of not doing anything, then the existence of such a button would seemingly demand that it be pushed.
Furthermore, I think it's reasonable to assume that, for most ordinary people, the utility of this button would outweigh that of our other activities. You can offer more pleasure to the world by quitting your job, leaving your partner, and abdicating from social obligations and instead pushing the button a few more thousand times each day.
stfu. there is no discussion necessary on a topic that is technologically and feasibly impossible to exist.
other than in your fag-fantasizing defective mind
