User Controls
The Retardest Thread: Fashionably Late Edition.
-
2018-05-06 at 7:31 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny So do you consider chemical dependence to not be a negative effect?
Do you agree with what §m£ÂgØL is saying here LSD, aldra?
We have been over this before, in the context of blanket legalization of recreational heroin use. It's because you've used the "safety" of heroin use as justification for it's legalization that I bring it up at all. Equivocating on the idea of the safety of a drug was a major part of your argument, which is why I pointed out that heroin is not at all safe in the way we would call something like aspirin a relatively safe drug.
If it were not for the financial, social, and legal repercussions, I don't see why chemical dependence should be seen as an intrinsically negative thing. Meaning, if it was free and plentiful, if it did not have the terrible stigma against it, and if there was no threat of punishment for using it, I don't see why it's automatically negative. -
2018-05-06 at 7:47 AM UTC
Originally posted by Juicebox Heroin also causes some hellacious constipation
Yeah but that's more of a side effect than a long term risk. Take some miralax and you'll be good. Constipation related complications are entirely avoidable, unlike say, the risk of cancer you get from consuming more than one drink a day. You could argue that one drink a day is 'responsible use' but you aren't even getting drunk soo -
2018-05-06 at 7:52 AM UTCanyone else notice how funny it is that an alcoholic argues about the safety of using a substance for justifying its legislation?
-
2018-05-06 at 7:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny So do you consider chemical dependence to not be a negative effect?
Do you agree with what §m£ÂgØL is saying here LSD, aldra?
We have been over this before, in the context of blanket legalization of recreational heroin use. It's because you've used the "safety" of heroin use as justification for it's legalization that I bring it up at all. Equivocating on the idea of the safety of a drug was a major part of your argument, which is why I pointed out that heroin is not at all safe in the way we would call something like aspirin a relatively safe drug.
I have never used the safety of heroin as justification for legalization.
I support full legalization and taxation because it would make things safer, and also because I believe it should be a given freedom to put whatever you want into your body in as safe and reliable a way as possible.
I don't think dependence in and of itself is a negative health effect. It's not like benzo dependence, which can result in death when you stop taking it. Opiate addiction is more of a psychological issue than a physiological one, which is what we're discussing. -
2018-05-06 at 7:54 AM UTC
Originally posted by LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery If it were not for the financial, social, and legal repercussions, I don't see why chemical dependence should be seen as an intrinsically negative thing. Meaning, if it was free and plentiful, if it did not have the terrible stigma against it, and if there was no threat of punishment for using it, I don't see why it's automatically negative.
exactly, kinda like chemical dependence to oxygen or h2o.
. -
2018-05-06 at 8:17 AM UTCreststop u sound like the lamest nerd 12 year old by the way you talk except youre like a 30 year old man
-
2018-05-06 at 8:19 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-05-06 at 8:23 AM UTC
-
2018-05-06 at 8:26 AM UTC
-
2018-05-06 at 8:27 AM UTC
-
2018-05-06 at 8:42 AM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-05-06 at 8:44 AM UTC
-
2018-05-06 at 8:45 AM UTC
-
2018-05-06 at 8:57 AM UTC
-
2018-05-06 at 9:27 AM UTC
-
2018-05-06 at 9:45 AM UTCjust here to fuck up your flush nigger
-
2018-05-06 at 10:37 AM UTCWhere the fuck has bling been?
-
2018-05-06 at 10:58 AM UTC
-
2018-05-06 at 11:42 AM UTCI'm glad Comedy Central is showing Scrubs again. It's been long enough where it's almost like watching it fresh. I definitely don't remember most episode plots, but there's still the nostalgia. Man, I might be mistaken, but it must've been near a decade since I watched this shit, maybe more.The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2018-05-06 at 11:44 AM UTC
Originally posted by LegalizeSpiritualDiscovery I'm glad Comedy Central is showing Scrubs again. It's been long enough where it's almost like watching it fresh. I definitely don't remember most episode plots, but there's still the nostalgia. Man, I might be mistaken, but it must've been near a decade since I watched this shit, maybe more.
do yourself a favour and don't watch past the first few seasons; it morphs into a drama at some point and becomes very unfunnyThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
