User Controls

The Retardest Thread: Fashionably Late Edition.

  1. Originally posted by MAL Wait so Casper and RestStop are the same person?

    No

    That’s cool. I wish I didn’t like Whole Foods as much as I do.


    Whole foods is a scam. Trader Joe's too.
  2. Originally posted by Jeremus Whole foods is a scam. Trader Joe's too.

    Their prices have gotten way better lately, almost the same as any other grocery store
  3. Originally posted by Fox Paws Their prices have gotten way better lately, almost the same as any other grocery store

    The price isn't the scam, the premise of the store is. It pushes an unnecessary, regressive narrative about health and food to court your business.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  4. A College Professor victim of incest [your moreover breastless limestone]
    Originally posted by Jeremus The price isn't the scam, the premise of the store is. It pushes an unnecessary, regressive narrative about health and food to court your business.

    They sell a lot of food that doesn't have nasty ingredients, you don't think they have generally healthier items?
  5. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Fox Paws I’ve tested myself irl enough to know how smart I really am. A lot of people rely on my intelligence on a daily basis. I succeed and excel at almost everything I do. Many people have described me as “brilliant” in my professional life. It’s extremely rare that I meet someone smarter than me.

    That said, almost everything I write on here is totally random shitposting to kill time, it’s not a good representation. The same could probably be said for most of you fuckers so it’s hard to tell sometimes who’s actually intelligent. Zanick is definitely up there though.

    Lol, nigga, you describe yourself as "brilliant" (or rather you recount other people describing you as brilliant) and you think I'm the one that overstates my intelligence.

    Eat a dick nigga
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  6. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    Originally posted by CASPER Nah. I was gonna antagonize RestStop since distance is no obstacle between me and his beloved.

    Nigga, check your PM.
  7. Originally posted by Lanny Lol, nigga, you describe yourself as "brilliant" (or rather you recount other people describing your as brilliant) and you think I'm the one that overstates my intelligence.

    Eat a dick nigga

    Someone’s salty.
  8. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Malice I'm thinking about changing majors and trying to get into investment banking. I really just want more money, and my divergent thinking and other autistic powers could make me a force to be reckoned with. You're in the financial sector, Lanny, what's your opinion on this?

    To be honest, computer programming for the financial sector seems like pretty unfulfilling, tedious, monotonous, soul crushing work; at least when it goes on for years, let alone decades.

    I'm also planning on claiming I'm transgender to increase my chances of getting into a good college. I'll go as far as to cross dress, wearing makeup and a wig, as well as lying to a therapist/psychologist if I have to. After I get in I'll just drop the act. "Oh, it turns out I may not have been transgender after all! I may simply be gender fluid and I'm currently going through a masculine phase."

    If you were good at it you'd make more money than programming but you won't be good at it since it requires people skills. Even the most stereotypical rainman fund manager needed to put on a suit and be not-autistic for years to get started. There are many fields that will tolerate your social inability on a good day, computer science is one, investment banking is not.

    Seeing as you probably haven't taken anything but GE courses at this point I'd suggest suspending judgement on what is and isn't fulfilling.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  9. Lanny Bird of Courage
    Originally posted by Fox Paws Someone’s salty.

    Not particularly salty, I'm just staggered by the irony you accusing me of being a pseudointellectual after what you've posted ITT
  10. Originally posted by Lanny Not particularly salty, I'm just staggered by the irony you accusing me of being a pseudointellectual after what you've posted ITT

    1. I never said you overstated your intelligence, in fact when you implied that I did the other day I immediately corrected you. I actually think you’re pretty smart, I just hate the manner in which you argue with people.

    Also 2. I’m not overstating my own intelligence right now, I’m just explaining factual information.
  11. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    Originally posted by Lanny If you were good at it you'd make more money than programming but you won't be good at it since it requires people skills. Even the most stereotypical rainman fund manager needed to put on a suit and be not-autistic for years to get started. There are many fields that will tolerate your social inability on a good day, computer science is one, investment banking is not.

    Seeing as you probably haven't taken anything but GE courses at this point I'd suggest suspending judgement on what is and isn't fulfilling.

    This, for sure. Malice, you're going to find some skills you didn't know you had that seem contrary to the agenda you've laid out for yourself. Try not to narrow your expectations.
    The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
  12. Originally posted by A College Professor They sell a lot of food that doesn't have nasty ingredients, you don't think they have generally healthier items?

    What "nasty ingredients" are you trying to avoid?

    And no, I don't think their items' "health value" (not going to argue about how dubious it is) is basically meaningless.
  13. I've been taking a few classes for fun at UCF but I've been debating going back full time and getting a degree in something I'm interested it, like Philosophy or something. I think on a level, I envy how open Malice's road is. I didn't really have the freedom to pick my degree track, so I was railroaded into computer science by my parents. I literally never touched it professionally and haven't programmed almost ever since I graduated, I have basically zero interest in actually programming and coding, I just find reading about technology and engineering interesting, that's why my parents thought I should do computer science.

    Idk though, a full degree would be a lot of work and it's the same thing, actually doing a philosophy track is more logic and notation than discussing "philosophy" like we do.
  14. Originally posted by CASPER Nah. I was gonna antagonize RestStop since distance is no obstacle between me and his beloved.

    That's pretty funny. I thought it might have been that.
  15. Originally posted by Jeremus I've been taking a few classes for fun at UCF but I've been debating going back full time and getting a degree in something I'm interested it, like Philosophy or something. I think on a level, I envy how open Malice's road is. I didn't really have the freedom to pick my degree track, so I was railroaded into computer science by my parents. I literally never touched it professionally and haven't programmed almost ever since I graduated, I have basically zero interest in actually programming and coding, I just find reading about technology and engineering interesting, that's why my parents thought I should do computer science.

    Idk though, a full degree would be a lot of work and it's the same thing, actually doing a philosophy track is more logic and notation than discussing "philosophy" like we do.

    I considered it, but I'm crap at logic - I'll admit. But yes, mostly logic classes and then your philosophy classes are less about bull shitting and more about critical thinking/creating an argument for your paper that uses the text as evidence. Philosophy of Science was the only class I ever dropped. I'm not so great at STEM, so it was just not worth the effort once I had decided to switch my major.
  16. Originally posted by MAL I considered it, but I'm crap at logic - I'll admit. But yes, mostly logic classes and then your philosophy classes are less about bull shitting and more about critical thinking/creating an argument for your paper that uses the text as evidence. Philosophy of Science was the only class I ever dropped. I'm not so great at STEM, so it was just not worth the effort once I had decided to switch my major.

    I'm good at practical logical thinking, but when you do philosophy, it hits another level of formal logic. Like look at this shit:

    http://cas2.umkc.edu/philosophy/vade-mecum/3-1.htm

    why would I ever want to delve into this
  17. Zanick motherfucker [my p.a. supernal goa]
    I'm not natively good with formal logic, but I've found it becomes more intuitive when you apply it in later courses. Unless you're at an upper-tier school with an established philosophy department, I think that securing independent study credits wherever possible gets the most out of a philosophy degree. Too many universities don't emphasize the subject enough, and might not have diverse course offerings or challenging curricula.
  18. Lanny Bird of Courage
    It's kinda uncommon to see notational prop logic in a philosophy paper. Like a few famous philosophers were into it Wittgenstein kinda turned the field away from that the the status quo has kinda been that you're expected to be literate but it's not really something you actually do. Like handwriting or base conversions or applying the chain rule.

    Also like Zanick said, you get a feel for it relatively quickly. Addition might have been technically challenging if you've never seen numbers or a plus sign before but academic philosophy is no more constituent in written formal logic than building bridges is in addition.
  19. Originally posted by Jeremus I'm good at practical logical thinking, but when you do philosophy, it hits another level of formal logic. Like look at this shit:

    http://cas2.umkc.edu/philosophy/vade-mecum/3-1.htm

    why would I ever want to delve into this

    Yeah haha that's what my intro logic stuff looked like. I don't know how I ever got a B in that class. lol
  20. Originally posted by Lanny It's kinda uncommon to see notational prop logic in a philosophy paper. Like a few famous philosophers were into it Wittgenstein kinda turned the field away from that the the status quo has kinda been that you're expected to be literate but it's not really something you actually do. Like handwriting or base conversions or applying the chain rule.

    Also like Zanick said, you get a feel for it relatively quickly. Addition might have been technically challenging if you've never seen numbers or a plus sign before but academic philosophy is no more constituent in written formal logic than building bridges is in addition.

    This is true. None of my professors outside of my logic class asked us to do notations like this. But understanding the basics of this kind of logic makes it easier to write a paper with a sound argument, because you know your points fit into one of those formulas for proven logical arguments. I'll go ahead and say this post is sub par because I've had a few shots of tequila now.

This Thread Has Been Locked

Jump to Top