User Controls
The Retarded Thread: Click Here for AIDS
-
2017-07-09 at 9 PM UTCyeh i got the votes 2 cnts a bote 2 hunned upbotes a hunned dollas fuk wit me
purple botes,,, orange submarines heheehehe -
2017-07-09 at 9:02 PM UTC
-
2017-07-09 at 9:13 PM UTCyallow hearts,,, purple dolfins heehehehehe
-
2017-07-09 at 9:17 PM UTC
Originally posted by hydromorphone This is funny that you think it's anger.
I don't have any anger at you, or most people. I have observations. I look back and see shit that is totally distorted and make note of it, I express when I have been upset, and when I feel I was taken advantage of, and I believe this might bother you. Sorry it does. It's life. Have fun with it. We clearly disagree on a lot of things, and you clearly see things very distorted. If I wanted to insult you, I would, I'm not shy in that regard, if I expressed anger, I would do so.
You definitely could pass for middle eastern, and have handsome and well tanned individual, albeit, lightly. You're hair tends to curl when short. You've already threatened the president so much so you had the secret service investigate your posts years ago. You don't seem to be careful about what you say. It would be funny, though I do hope it doesn't happen. It wasn't anger, mearly an observation, but again with your paranoia, you think everyone is angry and out to get you… you project a lot I think.. your actions speak louder than words.
You look like a deflated michelin man. Don't talk to me about looks. -
2017-07-09 at 9:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Shut the fuck up, CF. Repeating lines like this is annoying as hell, there's nothing funny about it. The people who do this are completely uncreative and simply too stupid to think of anything novel and creative. It makes you look like an obnoxious idiot.
What exactly do you expect it to accomplish? That we're going to decide to stop making longer posts, begin shitposting and behaving like the majority of members, or even stop posting at all? It's never dissuaded us at all for years that people have complained and commented on the length, why the fuck would it now?
You're doing nothing but adding worthless posts, wasting your time and effort, and embarrassing yourself.
Yeah, yeah, I'm sure you "didn't read" this as well. Brilliant, you sure showed me.
Didn't read. -
2017-07-09 at 9:19 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Response. Long as hell, of course:
Originally posted by hydromorphone This is funny that you think it's anger.
I don't have any anger at you, or most people. I have observations. I look back and see shit that is totally distorted and make note of it, I express when I have been upset, and when I feel I was taken advantage of, and I believe this might bother you. Sorry it does. It's life. Have fun with it. We clearly disagree on a lot of things, and you clearly see things very distorted. If I wanted to insult you, I would, I'm not shy in that regard, if I expressed anger, I would do so.
You definitely could pass for middle eastern, and have handsome and well tanned individual, albeit, lightly. You're hair tends to curl when short. You've already threatened the president so much so you had the secret service investigate your posts years ago. You don't seem to be careful about what you say. It would be funny, though I do hope it doesn't happen. It wasn't anger, mearly an observation, but again with your paranoia, you think everyone is angry and out to get you… you project a lot I think.. your actions speak louder than words.
Originally posted by Malice Oh, about the math, I forgot to mention something. I've seen it mentioned that there's a common trait among aspies where if a subject doesn't interest us we find it impossible to pay attention. Exactly how I feel about math and other subjects. Of course, when there's genuine interest, especially a high level, fascination, bam, full aspie powers unlocked and unleashed.
Also, I wasn't kidding about the difference Nardil made, beginning to really recover from depression for so long. I really am getting back my old self, my ability, being able to actually utilize my cognition, my strengths, more of the power my mind/brain has.
It's pretty undeniable right? There's an immense different in the post length I can churn out. Of course you guys won't consider this something positive, but it certainly is for university, of course the writing style and quality would be very different than casual unedited stream of consciousness posts on a message board.
This is kind of cool. I'd really like to see just how far I can go, develop myself. Especially once university starts, I'm 100% certain it's going to make an immense positive difference, although of course it's going to take time to adjust and for the effects to take place.
Of all the things I have read, these things are not among them.
Post last edited by Captain Falcon at 2017-07-09T21:25:33.928263+00:00 -
2017-07-09 at 9:22 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Was §m£ÂgØL actually investigated by the secret service for threatening the president? When did this occur, when he was a teenager? That's fucking hilarious, I never heard this before.
I've also been told I look middle eastern, much more than §m£ÂgØL might. There was actually a time when I was profiled by someone on the BART (mass transit train system) in plain clothes. I don't know what their occupational title is, but terrorists are a concern here, especially on the BART.
Post last edited by Malice at 2017-07-09T21:02:52.272218+00:00
Yeah, I made a joke post on Zoklet when I was 18. One post. They came to my house and did the whole good cop/bad cop routine and saw I was harmless then fucked off. One interesting bit is that they wanted to look through my books.
They read the Zoklet post off to my parents. I remember hearing my brother laugh in the background because he thought it was hilarious. It was nice hearing secret service agents say 'nigger.'
I don't look at all Middle Eastern. Anybody who's seen me can attest to that. For a while a friend called me a terrorist because I had grown out my beard, but I keep my facial hair short now. But that's probably what hydro is trying to play on. It's very obviously a hispanic beard and the only races I have ever been mistaken for were white and once, Korean. -
2017-07-09 at 10:26 PM UTC
Originally posted by Lanny I'm really surprised anyone liked that, I thought me and Myers were the only people around here that were into that kind of music. Do you listen to snowing as well?
Guess we got another dude who's into that type of music on this forum! It's been awhile since I've listened to it, it's mainly been pop punk and post-hardcore for me. -
2017-07-09 at 10:27 PM UTC
Originally posted by 霍比特人 Yeah, I made a joke post on Zoklet when I was 18. One post. They came to my house and did the whole good cop/bad cop routine and saw I was harmless then fucked off. One interesting bit is that they wanted to look through my books.
They read the Zoklet post off to my parents. I remember hearing my brother laugh in the background because he thought it was hilarious. It was nice hearing secret service agents say 'nigger.'
I don't look at all Middle Eastern. Anybody who's seen me can attest to that. For a while a friend called me a terrorist because I had grown out my beard, but I keep my facial hair short now. But that's probably what hydro is trying to play on. It's very obviously a hispanic beard and the only races I have ever been mistaken for were white and once, Korean.
You're §m£ÂgØL? You don't look Middle Eastern, you look more like an overweight Italian, if anything. -
2017-07-09 at 10:44 PM UTCThe following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire!
-
2017-07-09 at 10:49 PM UTC
-
2017-07-09 at 11:22 PM UTC
-
2017-07-09 at 11:24 PM UTCWhere have all the flowers gone?
WHERE THE FUCK HAVE ALL THE FLOWERS GONE?!?! WHERE ARE THEY?! WHERE ARE THE MOTHERFUCKING FLOWERS?! HELP, WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE FLOWERS?! THEY'RE NOT HERE, THEY'RE NOT THERE, THEY'RE NOT ANYWHERE! WHERE THE FUCK COULD THEY BE?! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?! WHO THE FUCK TOOK THEM?! ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?! GIVE ME BACK MY MOTHERFUCKING FLOWERS?! WHAT THE FUCK, MAN?! FUCK, WHO HAS THEM?! SOMEONE HAS TO HAVE THEM! FLOWERS, WHERE ARE THE FLOWERS?! FUCKING SAN FRANCISCANS WORE THEM ALL IN THEIR HAIR! THE jediS MUST HAVE A MONOPOLY! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON, WHICH ONE IS IT?! I CAN'T BELIEVE IT, HOW THE FUCK IS THIS POSSIBLE?! THIS CAN'T BE REAL, THIS CAN'T BE REAL! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING!The following users say it would be alright if the author of this post didn't die in a fire! -
2017-07-09 at 11:31 PM UTCMalice, are you feeling alright?
-
2017-07-09 at 11:33 PM UTCtest
-
2017-07-09 at 11:36 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice The main issue is whether you've done anything to substantially reduce the g loading.Ponder this: What percentage of the population would you estimate have studied IQ tests and psychometrics, devoted this amount of time over the period of time you have?
literally every single person who takes tests on that website. and the norms are still statistically valid. what this means is that people without training would score lower than their real iq score, and people with training would score similar to how they score on psychologist administered tests. this means that the tests are extremely hard and it is actually an imperative to have taken a lot of iq tests before. this is how the site is able to eliminate the practice effect. it has a tendency to DEFLATE rather than INFLATE scores, so for a person to get a non-deflated score, they would have to take many tests. the reason this is still valid is because many of the people who provided correlations to psychologist-administered tests did so before any intelligence testing whatsoever. so their original test scores are correlated to their trained test scores, leading to a deflated norm that can provide unrealistically low iq scores but cannot provide unrealistically high scores, which is much better.
my point is, even if a person practiced indefinitely, there is a maximum performance level attainable by that individual. more intelligent people will have a higher maximum performance. because my maximum score is 160 doesn't mean my true IQ is 160, it means it's within a maximum of 15-20 points of 160, because a person can only train so much before reaching a bottleneck, meaning a "real" IQ of at least 140 or 145, which is still probably higher than yours
like, look at this test: http://media.iqlati.net/2017/06/EMC-30R.pdf
it would be literally impossible for someone who isnt acquainted with iq testing to get a valid score on something this hard. you're recommended to spend 10 to 15 hours solving this one test. isn't that enough time for a full degree of practice effect to be completed? my score was 18/30, 149 sd15 on this one and i only spent 2-3 hours. notice how the mean IQ in the norm is 146.8 http://iqlati.net/emc-30r/ the reason for this is because regular people are far less likely to dedicate time to exploring and utilizing their full spectrum of capabilities to solve abstract and difficult problems, which is exactly what i've done and that you've been criticizing me for.
Post last edited by sploo at 2017-07-09T23:41:06.162661+00:00 -
2017-07-09 at 11:38 PM UTCI rich my church to gospel gold.
-
2017-07-09 at 11:46 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice Where have all the flowers gone?
WHERE THE FUCK HAVE ALL THE FLOWERS GONE?!?! WHERE ARE THEY?! WHERE ARE THE MOTHERFUCKING FLOWERS?! HELP, WHERE THE FUCK ARE THE FLOWERS?! THEY'RE NOT HERE, THEY'RE NOT THERE, THEY'RE NOT ANYWHERE! WHERE THE FUCK COULD THEY BE?! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?! WHO THE FUCK TOOK THEM?! ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME?! GIVE ME BACK MY MOTHERFUCKING FLOWERS?! WHAT THE FUCK, MAN?! FUCK, WHO HAS THEM?! SOMEONE HAS TO HAVE THEM! FLOWERS, WHERE ARE THE FLOWERS?! FUCKING SAN FRANCISCANS WORE THEM ALL IN THEIR HAIR! THE jediS MUST HAVE A MONOPOLY! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON, WHICH ONE IS IT?! I CAN'T BELIEVE IT, HOW THE FUCK IS THIS POSSIBLE?! THIS CAN'T BE REAL, THIS CAN'T BE REAL! FOR THE LOVE OF GOD, THIS CAN'T BE HAPPENING!
Originally posted by sploo literally every single person who takes tests on that website. and the norms are still statistically valid. what this means is that people without training would score lower than their real iq score, and people with training would score similar to how they score on psychologist administered tests. this means that the tests are extremely hard and it is actually an imperative to have taken a lot of iq tests before. this is how the site is able to eliminate the practice effect. it has a tendency to DEFLATE rather than INFLATE scores, so for a person to get a non-deflated score, they would have to take many tests. the reason this is still valid is because many of the people who provided correlations to psychologist-administered tests did so before any intelligence testing whatsoever. so their original test scores are correlated to their trained test scores, leading to a deflated norm that can provide unrealistically low iq scores but cannot provide unrealistically high scores, which is much better.
my point is, even if a person practiced indefinitely, there is a maximum performance level attainable by that individual. more intelligent people will have a higher maximum performance. because my maximum score is 160 doesn't mean my true IQ is 160, it means it's within a maximum of 15-20 points of 160, because a person can only train so much before reaching a bottleneck, meaning a "real" IQ of at least 140 or 145, which is still probably higher than yours
like, look at this test: http://media.iqlati.net/2017/06/EMC-30R.pdf
it would be literally impossible for someone who isnt acquainted with iq testing to get a valid score on something this hard. you're recommended to spend 10 to 15 hours solving this one test. isn't that enough time for a full degree of practice effect to be completed? my score was 18/30, 149 sd15 on this one and i only spent 2-3 hours. notice how the mean IQ in the norm is 146.8 http://iqlati.net/emc-30r/ the reason for this is because regular people are far less likely to dedicate time to exploring and utilizing their full spectrum of capabilities to solve abstract and difficult problems, which is exactly what i've done and that you've been criticizing me for.
Post last edited by sploo at 2017-07-09T23:41:06.162661+00:00
Didn't read. -
2017-07-09 at 11:48 PM UTCCome on, 146 iq bro.
Absorb this. -
2017-07-09 at 11:53 PM UTC
Originally posted by Malice
Lol, you've never even done mathematics, probably couldn't even produce a meaningful definition for it on the spot. Not that it's your fault, being a product of American primary and secondary education, but you should at least realize that your exposure to the field is, uhhh, not really representative of the field proper. And of course it doesn't change anything about your criticisms of mathematics in school, but again, sort of a strawman if you intended it as a critique of mathematics per se. Also the stats comment is kinda comic. Lockhart wrote a famous paper on this I think you might like: https://www.maa.org/external_archive/devlin/LockhartsLament.pdf
