User Controls
Poll: Should we open the country now?
-
Yes
- Cathay Coof ,
- Zanick ,
- A College Professor ,
- Archer513 ,
- -SpectraL ,
- Nil ,
- trippymindfuk ,
- AngryOnion ,
- Misguided Russian ,
- tr1pl3_thr3@t ,
- Splam ,
- Dfg ,
- Netflxchillr
-
No
- Technologist ,
- itybit ,
- mmQ ,
- Sudo ,
- STER0S ,
- risk ,
- MexicanMasterRace ,
- šæ ,
- BeeReBuddy ,
- Sophie
Should we open the country now?
-
2020-04-18 at 4:58 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny you are forgetting that the lab was run in collaboration with americans and arsetrallians and probably other some other countries.
even if it did leaked from the lab, it could have been done by paid foreign agents, of chinese or non chinese origins.
and
china sells anything the west wants to buy according to the principal of free market and trade, including tourists and harmless fentanyls. it is up the wisdom of chinas customers on what to import from china and how to utilize them without negative consequences.
did china put a gun to trumps, or anyone elses head for that matter head and say give us visa ?
Why would either of those two things make any difference?
Corona pops up next to the lab researching corona, it doesn't matter how it got loose, all that matters is that it did, and it needs to be covered up. And it doesn't matter why your customers buy your wares. -
2020-04-18 at 5:04 PM UTCLike I said, it's the Russians.
-
2020-04-18 at 5:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Why would either of those two things make any difference?
Corona pops up next to the lab researching corona, it doesn't matter how it got loose, all that matters is that it did, and it needs to be covered up. And it doesn't matter why your customers buy your wares.
accountability seems to be the thing when they're trying to pin the thing on china.
and like i said, it is the responsibility of each individual country to keep their respective country safe and their border secure from foreign threats, not china.
it is not the responsibility of china to baby sit your country and decides whats good for you and what should be barred from entering your country.
it is your own responsibility. -
2020-04-18 at 5:11 PM UTC
-
2020-04-18 at 5:14 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny accountability seems to be the thing when they're trying to pin the thing on china.
and like i said, it is the responsibility of each individual country to keep their respective country safe and their border secure from foreign threats, not china.
it is not the responsibility of china to baby sit your country and decides whats good for you and what should be barred from entering your country.
it is your own responsibility.
I'm arguing practicality, you're arguing morality and other nonsense. -
2020-04-18 at 5:16 PM UTC
-
2020-04-18 at 5:29 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny no, your asking why didnt china prevented its people from flooding other country.
im telling you this is how the world works.
I don't buy it.
I imagine China were going to close the airports, but were pressured to stay open by trading partners and businesses who export abroad - and rich people who wanted to leave. -
2020-04-18 at 6:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country I don't buy it.
I imagine China were going to close the airports, but were pressured to stay open by trading partners and businesses who export abroad - and rich people who wanted to leave.
do you really think the government of eireland would restrict the export of beers and whiskeys to islamic countries because they are very bad, harrumm to mooseleems ?
yes, they arent going to.
ever. -
2020-04-18 at 6:18 PM UTC
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny do you really think the government of eireland would restrict the export of beers and whiskeys to islamic countries because they are very bad, harrumm to mooseleems ?
yes, they arent going to.
ever.
If the Irish government developed a bioweapon, and it escaped, and was spreading in whiskey, then yes I would, as they wouldn't want their weapon to be studied by foreign scientists or to poison the drinkers of Irish whiskey. -
2020-04-18 at 6:25 PM UTC
Originally posted by Cathay Coof If the Irish government developed a bioweapon, and it escaped, and was spreading in whiskey, then yes I would, as they wouldn't want their weapon to be studied by foreign scientists or to poison the drinkers of Irish whiskey.
1 - not if theres no way it can be proven it came from a lab.
2 - that why you'll never be in the government, government is for MEN, not little girls. -
2020-04-18 at 8:11 PM UTCimagine startrek
-
2020-04-25 at 12:38 PM UTCJust an FYI
A provision entered into the stimulus package & voted in by Senate Democrats will allow Americans to make more money by "staying on" Unemployment than by working. Sen. Ben Sasse offered an amendment that would cap peopleās unemployment at 100% of peopleās paychecks; yet, every Senate Democrap, except Joe Manchin(D) was in favor of this ābloatedā provision.
Amendments: H.R.748 ā 116th Congress (2019-2020)
2. S.Amdt.1577 to S.Amdt.1578 ā 116th Congress (2019-2020)
Purpose: To ensure that additional unemployment benefits do not result in an individual receiving unemployment compensation that is more than the amount of wages the individual was earning prior to becoming unemployed.
Sponsor: Sen. Sasse, Ben [R-NE] (Submitted 03/25/2020) (Proposed 03/25/2020)
Latest Action: 03/25/20 Amendment SA 1577, under the order of 3/25/20, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 48. Record Vote Number: 79.
Quote:
Senate Democrat Ron Widen: āSupercharging unemployment has long been a priority for Senate Democrats. It was not a drafting error.ā
Yep, Ladies & Gents...
our Senate Democraps working to Keep Americanās āunemployedā is still their vision for the American peopleā¦ But weāall didnāt hear about this jacked-up chit in our mainstream media news- now, did we?!!! NOPE- you all still pissing all over- "what/how TRUMP said this-n-that" libtards keEping "rent space" all the "real" important chit, right?!!!
**So... this^^ is some of the reasons why Americans need to VOTE: libtard DEMOCRAP in November??? hmmmm.
DISCLAIMER:
Verivied by Amendment: H.R.748 ā 116th Congress (2019-2020) ITSELF. -
2020-04-25 at 12:44 PM UTCWell Iām unemployed and I thought that was pretty stupid - however, even with the max payout Iām still not making enough.
My Cobra will go into effect 6/30/20 - 600 bucks a month for just me.
My industry will be lucky to see enough bounce back by May of next year.
P.S going into week 6 and still not a single unemployment check -
2020-04-25 at 12:55 PM UTC
Originally posted by Stopffs Well Iām unemployed and I thought that was pretty stupid - however, even with the max payout Iām still not making enough.
My Cobra will go into effect 6/30/20 - 600 bucks a month for just me.
My industry will be lucky to see enough bounce back by May of next year.
P.S going into week 6 and still not a single unemployment check
If you are single & w/o dependants- you are probably going to "wait" until Families or Head of Households with Dependant Children get paid.
*just how the ball rolls... You're gonna wait in line. -
2020-04-25 at 1:03 PM UTC
Originally posted by Netflxchillr Just an FYI
A provision entered into the stimulus package & voted in by Senate Democrats will allow Americans to make more money by "staying on" Unemployment than by working. Sen. Ben Sasse offered an amendment that would cap peopleās unemployment at 100% of peopleās paychecks; yet, every Senate Democrap, except Joe Manchin(D) was in favor of this ābloatedā provision.
Amendments: H.R.748 ā 116th Congress (2019-2020)
2. S.Amdt.1577 to S.Amdt.1578 ā 116th Congress (2019-2020)
Purpose: To ensure that additional unemployment benefits do not result in an individual receiving unemployment compensation that is more than the amount of wages the individual was earning prior to becoming unemployed.
Sponsor: Sen. Sasse, Ben [R-NE] (Submitted 03/25/2020) (Proposed 03/25/2020)
Latest Action: 03/25/20 Amendment SA 1577, under the order of 3/25/20, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 48. Record Vote Number: 79.
Quote:
Senate Democrat Ron Widen: āSupercharging unemployment has long been a priority for Senate Democrats. It was not a drafting error.ā
Yep, Ladies & Gents…
our Senate Democraps working to Keep Americanās āunemployedā is still their vision for the American peopleā¦ But weāall didnāt hear about this jacked-up chit in our mainstream media news- now, did we?!!! NOPE- you all still pissing all over- "what/how TRUMP said this-n-that" libtards keeping "rent space" all the "real" important chit, right?!!!
**So… this^^ is some of the reasons why Americans need to VOTE: libtard DEMOCRAP in November??? hmmmm.
DISCLAIMER:
Verivied by Amendment: H.R.748 ā 116th Congress (2019-2020) ITSELF.
What do ye say- Libtards? about your "Party" wanting to keep Americans UNEMPLOYED??
-
2020-04-25 at 1:10 PM UTC
Originally posted by Stopffs Well Iām unemployed and I thought that was pretty stupid - however, even with the max payout Iām still not making enough.
My Cobra will go into effect 6/30/20 - 600 bucks a month for just me.
My industry will be lucky to see enough bounce back by May of next year.
P.S going into week 6 and still not a single unemployment check
Exactly this. Everybody complaining about it being too much is retarded. Remember when it was gonna be 2k? 1200 is just enough to barely get by for the month. If people are making less than that then there's something wrong with wages. -
2020-04-25 at 1:11 PM UTC
Originally posted by Netflxchillr What do ye say- Libtards? about your "Party" wanting to keep Americans UNEMPLOYED??
Considering that these bills are only temporary measures, itās highly unlikely that it would ākeep Americans unemployedā. Thatās taking it a bit far.
Was it a dumb? Donāt fully know their motives, so I canāt say. From the surface it seems dumb.
But it takes a two party system to balance things out, which is exactly what we have, (barring the few independents). -
2020-04-25 at 1:13 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Exactly this. Everybody complaining about it being too much is retarded. Remember when it was gonna be 2k? 1200 is just enough to barely get by for the month. If people are making less than that then there's something wrong with wages.
^^ lazy slag.
get a better damn job. Bet, you're one of those that would stay on "unemployment," forever, huh? Chit's never "enough" BS.
-
2020-04-25 at 1:16 PM UTC
Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Exactly this. Everybody complaining about it being too much is retarded. Remember when it was gonna be 2k? 1200 is just enough to barely get by for the month. If people are making less than that then there's something wrong with wages.
In Ohio it would mean roughly 1000.00 a week.
456.00 I believe is the max regular weekly unemployment wage pretax.
The fedgov is adding 600.00 to the weekly I believe. Now I have to look it up. Iāve burned a few brain cells the past 3 days. -
2020-04-25 at 1:19 PM UTC
