User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1841
  6. 1842
  7. 1843
  8. 1844
  9. 1845
  10. 1846
  11. ...
  12. 1897
  13. 1898
  14. 1899
  15. 1900

Posts by -SpectraL

  1. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Shut the fuck up Spectral you're even worse.
    Not even scary.
  2. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Anything can be engineered into a bot. Even an old pair of gloves or a busted fishing rod.
  3. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Sure thing Spectard. Care to explain how you can reply to something you can't see or read you toothless old hack?


    I simply... sense... the drivel you are spewing. I'm very intuitive that way.
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Nice try, I'll give you that, but NO. It would be 'more close to the truth.' When prefacing a word with 'more,' you don't need to add anything to the word, you see? More powerfuler? More greater? More friendlier? No. More powerful than so and so. More great than so and so. More friendly. Yes. >=)
    How about "more closely"? I'll bet you forgot all about that one, didn't you, Ms. Smartypants?
  5. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    "more closer" spec? Dang man DANG! I expect better from you!

    Actually, "more closer" is allowed in this case, strange as that may be. This is because the objects of my sentence are "Lazy Lanny" (in the opening post) and "Lethargic Lanny" (in my post) . Two objects, not just one! So "Lethargic Lanny" is closer to the truth, "more closer", than "Lazy Lanny" is. If you just said, "Lethargic Lanny is closer to the truth, without using the word, "more", it doesn't convey the thought that Lethargic Lanny is closer than Lazy Lanny is to the truth, because it doesn't even indicate there are two objects to compare which one is closer to the truth. So you see? No mistake at all!
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]


    http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=55a_1443561651
  7. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    nope.jpg

    your history rewrites are as bad as spectrals

    Quiet, you. >:c(
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    How do you know what rule if you have me on ignore skippy?
    You just let me handle the finer details. Suffice it to say, I can't see or read anything you type. You're wasting your time.
  9. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    The cloud is on a local area network. LIKE A ROUTER.

    But a router can be exploited, and therefore, so can a cloud. Nothing is "safe".
  10. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Remember ignoring is butthurt announced

    That rule doesn't count if the person is just spamming garbage in every thread and not actually bringing anything to the table, like you never do.
  11. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I would suggest "Lethargic Lanny" may actually be more closer to the truth.
  12. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I am so embarrassed for you.

    You're one to talk. You look like a cross between the wicked queen in Snow White and Mr. Bean.
  13. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Perhaps you should attend a remedial reading class?

    No, I can read it, it's just that I can't read it right now because you're on my Ignore List. Sorry.
  14. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I remember this old trojan constructor kit from the early 2000's which used HEX code to obfuscate the shellcode. It built a standalone .html file which, when loaded locally or remotely in the browser, executed a driveby script which contained mostly HEX code and javascript, which built an executable .HTA file on-the-fly in the viewer's TEMP folder, which then used the obfuscated shell code in the HEX to build the trojan .EXE and start it. It was really cool the way it worked. Trying to find the POC for it, but it appears to be lost to time now.

    _________________________
    [FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=14px]An [/SIZE][/FONT]HTML Application[FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=14px] ([/SIZE][/FONT]HTA[FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=14px]) is a [/SIZE][/FONT]Microsoft Windows[FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=14px] program whose source code consists of [/SIZE][/FONT]HTML[FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=14px], [/SIZE][/FONT]Dynamic HTML[FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=14px], and one or more scripting languages supported by [/SIZE][/FONT]Internet Explorer[FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=14px], such as [/SIZE][/FONT]VBScript[FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=14px] or [/SIZE][/FONT]JScript[FONT=sans-serif][SIZE=14px]. The HTML is used to generate the user interface, and the scripting language is used for the program logic. An HTA executes without the constraints of the internet browser security model; in fact, it executes as a "fully trusted" application.[/SIZE][/FONT]
  15. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    And his name is Zork, spelled backward.
  16. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Metaphysicist is actually one of the rare people with a good heart, who truly cares for people and has honest intentions. The only problem there is that he takes it too far. He's all about extremes. There is never any happy balance. Me, I'm all about balance. That's why we could never get together on anything.
  17. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    So you're saying he could very well stab everyone to death with a can opener and then escape justice? Interesting.
  18. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Just fuck already

    tl/dr
  19. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    And yet you ended up sucking his sack at TDD until I ran you off.
    Not at all, Darkie. Get your facts straight, bud. Metaphysicist invited me there and asked me to mod it. I didn't ask him for anything. And when he turned traitor to the Totse core values, I left him behind to soak in his own sense of self-importance. That's what really happened.
  20. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    still a faggot

    You don't scare me none.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1841
  6. 1842
  7. 1843
  8. 1844
  9. 1845
  10. 1846
  11. ...
  12. 1897
  13. 1898
  14. 1899
  15. 1900
Jump to Top