User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1734
  6. 1735
  7. 1736
  8. 1737
  9. 1738
  10. 1739
  11. ...
  12. 1897
  13. 1898
  14. 1899
  15. 1900

Posts by -SpectraL

  1. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny Exactly the same, an FPGA doesn't do anything for network latency

    How about ultra low latency FPGAs? What's the equation then?
  2. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I'm going to have some fun with these dumb fucks.
  3. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by aldra FBI knocking on your door

    I better get my ultra-violet lamp out then. :)
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Blue.
  5. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by infinityshock nail them in a well-chlorinated swimming pool.

    No, thanks. Even then, she could have something contagious lurking there in the back of her snatch
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Smelly.
  7. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    What would the equation be when using multiple field-programmable gate arrays?
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    "friend"

    ^ there's your first mistake
  9. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny You completely misunderstood the math. The last figure is how long it would take you to use every IP in the world and in parallel at the fastest possible rate with no network latency. What you don't seem to grasp is the biggest part of the time here is the keyspace, not the banning strategy. Like I said in my first post, if I never banned an ip address and you were able to continuously try at a rate of one attempt per 50ms (about as low network latency as you could possibly hope for) per computer, and you used 2^128 computers in parallel (the number addressable, and vastly more than exist in all the world today) it would still take you hundreds of orders of magnitude longer on average than the universe has existed to bruteforce the ssh login.

    Errr.. how long has the universe existed?
  10. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny You get 3 attempts in 10 minutes with a ban time of 30 minutes meaning it's faster to stay under the ban than keep hitting it…

    No, no, no, kid. I wouldn't "stay under the ban" at all. If I have three permitted attempts before being banned, I will use all three attempts, and then the IP will become banned. Then I will move to the next IP and try three more times, and so on. That's the fastest way. And if the IP is banned for 30 minutes, that is inconsequential, because I will already have moved on to the next unbanned IP. Once I reach the limit of all my available unbanned IPs, the 30 minutes will have passed, and the once-banned IPs will have already been unbanned. I didn't just fall off the turnip truck last night, you know.

  11. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by DocFoster Words to live by

    Is that you, Arms?
  12. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Sophie You should learn that everything that has to do with Zoklet and comes from Spectral's mouth is a lie.

    ^ This from a self-professed pedophile, who, admittedly, likes them as young as 4 years old.
  13. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny Well that's true. Would you like me to redo the prior calculation but replacing the latency figure with the minimum possible amount of time between consecutive failures an address can average? Because it's like thousands of times higher.

    Sure. Let's see it.
  14. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
  15. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by snab_snib niggas in space is such a dumb name. i'm not sure if it's good dumb or bad dumb yet. the jury is out currently.

    Not really dumb, just extremely shortsighted. After all, Lanny is from a (now-extinct) much larger pack of chronic shortsighters, who were in control of the Zoklet community. They were very well known for flying in the face of basic common sense and even the most rudimentary levels of logic. Placing the term "nigga" in the title only serves to block, or at least delegate, the entire site away from 90%+ of web crawlers, search engines, and network enhancements. On the other hand, the name serves to make Lanny personally look like a "hard OG", which is how those shortsighters always operated - not from any sense of practical methods, but rather from the extreme need to satiate their own starved egos - so it's not like the name just appeared out of thin air at random or anything; they prefer momentary personal satisfaction over the best welfare of the community in each and every instance, every single time.
  16. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I wonder if an African spacesuit would leak.
  17. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by benny vader Nope. Still Obama Century then.

    True, but still close enough to the end of his presidency to justify the theory. Zoklet closed at the end of 2014, with only 24 months left in his second term.
  18. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by benny vader not true.

    Yes, it is true, benny.
  19. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Lanny I mean you could but root login is disabled. You could easily guess my login enabled account but 1024 bit key over 8 attempts per IP is many orders of magnitudes greater than the number of IPv6 addresses in the world and even if somehow you got around the IP banning (you can't) and assuming an unrealistically low 50ms per attempt then it would take on average somewhat more time to brute force the login to niggasin.space than the universe has existed for (which is significantly longer than you think it is).

    You left out the fact that the 8 attempts per IP is not permanent. I could cycle through the IP addresses again and again.
  20. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Some "tools" also have intelligent capabilities, whereupon if the tool detects certain people, in certain places, at certain times, under certain circumstances, it will completely fry the user's entire system and self-destruct, so beware.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1734
  6. 1735
  7. 1736
  8. 1737
  9. 1738
  10. 1739
  11. ...
  12. 1897
  13. 1898
  14. 1899
  15. 1900
Jump to Top