User Controls
Posts by -SpectraL
-
2019-03-07 at 4:22 PM UTC in (Respecfully) Fuck this venueWelcome to the suburbs. There is no escape.
-
2019-03-07 at 4:14 PM UTC in Summer is over
-
2019-03-07 at 4:12 PM UTC in Summer is overLike I said, "scientists" are idiots. All you have to do is look at what they said yesterday and then compare it to what actually happens. Very rarely matches up. They're like incompetent and undependable weather reporters, but even worse.
-
2019-03-07 at 3:34 PM UTC in Zoklet links
-
2019-03-07 at 7:04 AM UTC in The doctors gave my 11 year old brother hard drugs
Originally posted by gadzooks Okay, follow up question here…
(Still kinda devil's advocate)…
What do you do for a baby that is in constant pain?
What's the alternative to opiate-based pain killers?
Just give them some kind of drug that will keep them from crying in order to appease the parents?
Now THAT would be barbaric.
Well, since it's already commonplace for them to prescribe opiates like Oxycontin to pregnant women and babies, why would the idea of them prescribing alternatives even be relevant? Kind of like discussing the barn doors being open after all the cows already got out, right? -
2019-03-07 at 6:52 AM UTC in The doctors gave my 11 year old brother hard drugs
-
2019-03-07 at 6:47 AM UTC in The doctors gave my 11 year old brother hard drugs
-
2019-03-07 at 6:42 AM UTC in BDSMIt's been decades since I got a BSOD.
-
2019-03-07 at 6:40 AM UTC in The doctors gave my 11 year old brother hard drugs"Physicians are already allowed to prescribe virtually any medication they want for any purpose they feel is clinically appropriate, although the insurance company may require them to justify their decision through a prior approval process. This is called "off-label" prescribing and it is done all the time. OxyContin had been prescribed for kids long before this expanded approval."
https://www.pharmacytimes.com/contributor/jason-poquette/2015/08/oxycontin-for-kids-6-things-pharmacists-should-know
Also, have you ever heard the term, "exposure in utero" before? -
2019-03-07 at 6:33 AM UTC in Zoklet links
-
2019-03-07 at 6:32 AM UTC in The doctors gave my 11 year old brother hard drugsThese days, "doctors" will even prescribe babies Oxycontin, as long as it shuts them up and the money is good.
-
2019-03-07 at 6:29 AM UTC in Zoklet links*puts on lawyer's hat*
Toward what entity, or entities, is the FOIA request directed? -
2019-03-07 at 6:26 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs Attention
Originally posted by mmQ When I was in longterm inpatient treatment I practiced holding my breath using deep sea diver techniques (aggresively hyperventilating beforehand) and was able to hold my breath for almost 6 minutes at one point. Weirdest feeling. The first 4 minutes just went by and it felt like I hadn't even started.
You can even store spare air somewhat by closing your throat and then trapping some air between your cheeks. Once you absolutely need air, you suck that stored air in from your cheeks, and it gives you extra time before emergency surfacing is required. -
2019-03-07 at 6:18 AM UTC in Just got an email from schoolPalestine is mentioned numerous times in the bible and other ancient texts.
Palestine in the ancient world was part of the region known as Canaan where the Kingdoms of Israel and Judah were located. The term `Palestine’ was originally a designation of an area of land in southern Canaan which the people known as the Philistines occupied a very small part of, the Canaanites, Canaanite-Phoenicians, and the Israelites, among others, having established themselves in the area much earlier. The Philistines are thought to have come to the area toward the end of the Bronze Age c. 1276 BCE and established themselves on the southern coastal plain of the Mediterranean Sea in an area afterwards known as Philistia.
The whole of the region was referred to as `Canaan’ in Mesopotamian texts and trade records found at Ebla and Mari as early as the 18th century BCE while the term `Palestine’ does not appear in any written records until the 5th century BCE in the Histories of Herodotus. After Herodotus, the term `Palestine’ came to be used for the entire region which was formerly known as Canaan.
The region is part of the so-called fertile crescent and human habitation there can be traced back to before 10, 000 BCE. The lands were originally inhabited by nomadic hunter-gatherers who most likely immigrated from Mesopotamia but became sedentary agriculturalists by the Early Bronze Age (c.3500-c.2000 BCE). In the Middle Bronze Age (c. 2000-c.1550 BCE)) trade with other nations expanded and Canaan prospered and in the Late Bronze Age (c.1550-c. 1200 BCE) this affluence continued as the region was incorporated into the Egyptian Empire (c.1570-c.1069 BCE).
https://www.ancient.eu/palestine/
-
2019-03-07 at 6:12 AM UTC in Aliens Cause Global Warming
Originally posted by vindicktive vinny i dont you understand what im saying, its not the fudging of the data. its the interpretation of it.
say an artifact is 6000 years old according to c14 dating technique. that means it could be either 5500 years old or 6500 years old, now your free to place this piece of artifact as to belong to the reign of this pharoa or that, and youll still be right.
not really. scientists are people too, and have their biases due to their personal beliefs or financial needs.
scientists are no more different than your typical politicians, and the only difference between them is instead of working with lesgilation and legislating, they work with data and the intepretation of it.
Most times it's even simpler than that. It's just that they are God-damned stupid and practically brain-dead idiots, who got their credentials out of a CrackerJack box. And I'm not kidding. Some of these jackasses have a lower IQ than, say, a bag of rocks, or a tree stump. -
2019-03-07 at 6:10 AM UTC in Aliens Cause Global Warming
Originally posted by gadzooks Yeah, an INDIVIDUAL could totally fudge up their data… But then when that same study is scrutinized by others in the field, or new evidence comes to light, then that PARTICULAR SCIENTIST will be shown for the fraud that they are.
For ENTIRE scientific fields to pull this shit off would require a little thing called a conspiracy.
And the second anyone started dropping that particular C-word, I'm out.
I'll debate reality, not wild and unsubstantiated speculation.
There's a big difference between conspiracies theories, and conspiracy facts. Most people run when the conspiracy facts come out, not when the conspiracy theories come out. Fact. -
2019-03-07 at 2:11 AM UTC in The Retarded Thread: Sploo Needs AttentionI can swim a full mile underwater while holding my breath.
-
2019-03-07 at 1:35 AM UTC in Aliens Cause Global Warming
Originally posted by gadzooks If you're referring to WHAT we research, then yes, that's absolutely true.
But if you mean to imply that THE RESULTS we get from research are biased, that is vastly false.
No, it's not, because "interpreting" of the results also relies on the "interpreter's" motivation and agenda. Sorry, but "scientists" lost any and all credibility long ago. They made their bed, now they need to lie in it.
ie:
Coffee is good for you!
Coffee is bad for you!
Sugar is good for you!
Sugar is bad for you!
Global warming!
Oops.. I mean climate change!
Which is when I usually reply to them, 'how about go fuck yourself!?' -
2019-03-07 at 12:50 AM UTC in Aliens Cause Global Warming
-
2019-03-07 at 12:48 AM UTC in If you could make $100,000 from a crime, would you?There's zebras with white stripes, and then there are zebras with black stripes.
