User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1012
  6. 1013
  7. 1014
  8. 1015
  9. 1016
  10. 1017
  11. ...
  12. 1897
  13. 1898
  14. 1899
  15. 1900

Posts by -SpectraL

  1. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    I hate the big fat lazy ones who sit at the donut shop all day, yacking with their fat fellow fat fucks, and filling their fat faces off the public tit. Those fat, stinking fuckers are a disgrace.
  2. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Too much water and too much energy. Unless you had enriched uranium, it would be grossly inefficient to try and convert to steam.
  3. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    You are all part of a social experiment.
  4. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    The ironic part is that they didn't come here. They were already here! Long, long ago. And they're still here!
  5. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Grylls its just fucking water man

    I don't think you understand what living off the grid means.
  6. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Rather than evaporate it, it would be more efficient to store it, and then process the bathwater through a chemical fιlter and route it to your drinking supply. You could hook up the toilet that way, too.
  7. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Exactly what a fed here would say?
  8. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by WellHung You lie just for the sake of lying. Unfortunately, people that do that lose all credibility.

    Not at all. I can easily lie and still keep my credibility. I've done it many times.
  9. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by WellHung Bullshit.

    Yeah? You don't think so? Just look at Lanny and aldra.
  10. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Three quarters of the users here are law enforcement, and I don't think they're going to want to wipe their hard drives.
  11. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by Technologist Where’d ya go benny? Come on, defend your defenseless position!

    Hey, he has to sleep (with underage children) sometime!
  12. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    This is the betabetically-organized and abbreviated shortlist of what Gadzooks will consuming today:

  13. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Still almost two months of this shit left. Don't fool yourself.
  14. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    A media access control address (MAC address) of a device is a unique identifier assigned to a network interface controller (NIC) for communications at the data link layer of a network segment. MAC addresses are used as a network address for most IEEE 802 network technologies, including Ethernet, Wi-Fi and Bluetooth. In this context, MAC addresses are used in the medium access control protocol sublayer. A MAC may be referred to as the burned-in address (BIA). It may also be known as an Ethernet hardware address (EHA), hardware address or physical address (not to be confused with a memory physical address). A network node may have multiple NICs and each NIC must have a unique MAC address. Sophisticated network equipment such as a multilayer switch or router may require one or more permanently assigned MAC addresses. MAC addresses are most often assigned by the manufacturer of a NIC and are stored in its hardware, such as the card's read-only memory or some other firmware mechanism. A MAC address may include the manufacturer's organizationally unique identifier (OUI). MAC addresses are formed according to the rules of one of three numbering name spaces managed by the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE): EUI-48 (it replaces the obsolete term MAC-48) and EUI-64. EUI is an abbreviation for Extended Unique Identifier.
  15. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Psychomanthis could be gotten easier than he thinks. All I'd have to do is simply obfuscate a malicious hotlink and get him to click on it, then shellcode would be uploaded and executed on his machine, paging out his true MAC ID and IP. He's not near as safe as he thinks he is.
  16. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by gadzooks Says the guy who banned so-called "kidiots" for """spamming""" Zoklet.

    We've been over this so many times.

    Just acknowledge the hypocrisy so we can move on.

    I already explained why there's no hypocrisy, you just weren't listening.
  17. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    Originally posted by POLECAT tech,, when residing in a pedo's house you still need to show some respect or leave the house alltogether… deez niggas were enjoying thee same converstions long before dh found this place.

    they sure as fuk dont care what you think about the subject.

    my feelings are if she wants the cock give it to her,, age is just a number.

    as for the law I'm cool with 16 being the ageof consent

    Pedo alert. ^
  18. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    People spending hours just to get rid of poor ol' finny. Sad.
  19. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CNAME_record#Terminology_of_CNAME_vs_.22canonical_name.22

    DNS CNAME records are specified in RFC 1034 and clarified in Section 10 of RFC 2181. CNAME records are handled specially in the domain name system, and have several restrictions on their use. When a DNS resolver encounters a CNAME record while looking for a regular resource record, it will restart the query using the canonical name instead of the original name. (If the resolver is specifically told to look for CNAME records, the canonical name (right-hand side) is returned, rather than restarting the query.) The canonical name that a CNAME record points to can be anywhere in the DNS, whether local or on a remote server in a different DNS zone.
    For example, if there is a DNS zone as follows:

    NAME TYPE VALUE
    --------------------------------------------------
    bar.example.com. CNAME foo.example.com.
    foo.example.com. A 192.0.2.23
    when an A record lookup for bar.example.com is carried out, the resolver will see a CNAME record and restart the checking at foo.example.com and will then return 192.0.2.23.
  20. -SpectraL coward [the spuriously bluish-lilac bushman]
    ie:

    Yeah, go for it, you fucker. If you want to write a management command(django's mechanism for scripts that don't happen as part of the request/response cycle), but I'll bet you're too dumb for it, to pull it straight from the DB and dump that god damned garbage into some CSV files or something I wouldn't mind running it and just sending your idiotic ass the output instead of you having to scrape everything using that shovel nose of yours. Obviously it would have to only output publicly available data for you to piss all over, but that's probably cleaner than fucking parsing the markup and trying to extract the son-of-a-bitch that way.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 1012
  6. 1013
  7. 1014
  8. 1015
  9. 1016
  10. 1017
  11. ...
  12. 1897
  13. 1898
  14. 1899
  15. 1900
Jump to Top