User Controls
Posts by -SpectraL
-
2019-03-17 at 6:48 PM UTC in Spectral has gotten stupider with age*poasting in -SpectraL Hate Thread™ #937,623*
-
2019-03-17 at 6:14 PM UTC in Does anyone else miss Obama?
-
2019-03-17 at 6:11 PM UTC in Where is the line between being a junkie and not?"Never tell them where the line is, because if they know where it is, they will want to get so near it that they end up crossing it. Better to keep the line a secret." ~ zok
-
2019-03-17 at 6:09 PM UTC in Does anyone else miss Obama?Obama: the Fake 44th President
Illegally ran for President with a bogus birth certificate. Should be behind bars for fraud, treason and sedition.
-
2019-03-17 at 5:33 PM UTC in Does anyone else miss Obama?I always give billions to people who want to kill me. Just call me eccentric.
-
2019-03-17 at 5:07 PM UTC in Does anyone else miss Obama?
-
2019-03-17 at 4:04 PM UTC in The Legend of the NoidKenneth was part of the advertising campaign. He was their lead undercover salesman.
-
2019-03-17 at 4 PM UTC in Why do we feed billions to our pet parasite Israel?Octlet.
-
2019-03-17 at 9:15 AM UTC in holy fuck
-
2019-03-17 at 9:13 AM UTC in Christchurch shooting videoMalicious communications
Section 127 of the act makes it an offence to send a message that is grossly offensive or of an indecent, obscene or menacing character over a public electronic communications network.[9] The section replaced section 43 of the Telecommunications Act 1984 and is drafted as widely as its predecessor.[10] The section has been used controversially to prosecute users of social media in cases such as the Twitter Joke Trial and Facebook comments concerning the murder of April Jones.[11]
On 19 December 2012, to strike a balance between freedom of speech and criminality, the Director of Public Prosecutions issued interim guidelines, clarifying when social messaging is eligible for criminal prosecution under UK law. Only communications that are credible threats of violence, harassment, or stalking (such as aggressive Internet trolling) which specifically targets an individual or individuals, or breaches a court order designed to protect someone (such as those protecting the identity of a victim of a sexual offence) will be prosecuted. Communications that express an "unpopular or unfashionable opinion about serious or trivial matters, or banter or humour, even if distasteful to some and painful to those subjected to it" will not. Communications that are merely "grossly offensive, indecent, obscene or false" will be prosecuted only when it can be shown to be necessary and proportionate. People who pass on malicious messages, such as by retweeting, can also be prosecuted when the original message is subject to prosecution. Individuals who post messages as part of a separate crime, such as a plan to import drugs, would face prosecution for that offence, as is currently the case.[12][13][14]
Revisions to the interim guidelines were issued on 20 June 2013 following a public consultation.[15] The revisions specified that prosecutors should consider:
whether messages were aggravated by references to race, religion or other minorities, and whether they breached existing rules to counter harassment or stalking; and
the age and maturity of any wrongdoer should be taken into account and given great weight.
The revisions also clarified that criminal prosecutions were "unlikely":
when the author of the message had "expressed genuine remorse";
when "swift and effective action ... to remove the communication" was taken; or
when messages were not intended for a wide audience.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Act_2003#Malicious_communications -
2019-03-17 at 8:51 AM UTC in Dump threadIn 2007, the media was fooled by trollers into believing that students were consuming a drug called Jenkem, purportedly made of human waste. A user named Pickwick on TOTSE posted pictures implying that he was inhaling this drug. Major news corporations such as Fox News Channel reported the story and urged parents to warn their children about this drug. Pickwick's pictures of Jenkem were fake and the pictures did not actually feature human waste.[72]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Internet_troll -
2019-03-17 at 8:50 AM UTC in holy fuck
-
2019-03-17 at 8:23 AM UTC in Does anyone else miss Obama?
-
2019-03-17 at 8:19 AM UTC in holy fuck
-
2019-03-17 at 7:34 AM UTC in holy fuckFucking gestapo scumbags have deleted that uncut raw video file right off the Internet entirely. Worldwide. Just goes to show how deep these censuring cockroaches are on the web, and what they can do to shut people up. Fortunately, these scum don't affect me at all, so here's the full video...
https://app.box.com/file/422880610071 -
2019-03-17 at 6:41 AM UTC in holy fuck
-
2019-03-17 at 6:02 AM UTC in holy fuck
Originally posted by STER0S it's gotta be hosted somewhere.
someone find it for me.
https://www.liveleak.com/view?t=CBX8o_1552615032 -
2019-03-17 at 4:52 AM UTC in Lan, Do you have Mods here?
-
2019-03-17 at 4:50 AM UTC in Did Ohfralala get blown away in yesterday's spate of Alabama tornados?
-
2019-03-17 at 4:41 AM UTC in Does anyone else miss Obama?
