User Controls

  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 51
  6. 52
  7. 53
  8. 54
  9. 55
  10. 56
  11. ...
  12. 60
  13. 61
  14. 62
  15. 63

Posts by Splam

  1. Splam African Astronaut
    Originally posted by hydromorphone I mean… This is a good start to ending prohibition on drugs, however… Why would you, knowing that people STILL are going to inject, provide them with an oral pill form? Why not just provide the shit straight up, ready to IV as one would find in a hospital? It'd sterile, clean, and well… You'd have less issues in the event of a miss causing abcesses from unsanitary water, cookers and the like which could occur. If done how I suggested, all one would need to worry about is a clean rig and property prepping the skin prior to injection…

    The safe injection sites provide all the equipment needed.
    Crushing the pills is relatively safe, this is what hospitals used to do.
    Can't imagine it being a good idea to give them a bunch of liquid opiates. Too easy to spill.
  2. Splam African Astronaut
    I am splam. Look up my 15k posts on totse. Is there still an archive?
  3. Splam African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Fox Also not attacking the messenger, attacking the idea that 9/11 was faked (it wasn’t).

    You missed my sarcasm. Whether 9/11 is real or not is irrelevant. Can you imagine CNN dedicating 24/7 coverage for years on end about 9/11? No - because conspiracy theories don't deserve extended airtime on news networks!
  4. Splam African Astronaut
    Yes, that's what differentiates this program from other programs like morphine treatment. Other treatments are given at the pharmacies, and must be swallowed on the spot.

    These pills are specifically made for crushing up and injecting. Back in the day hospitals would do the same, crush pills to inject. Should be safe. Otherwise people who like injecting are still going to go buy fent and the program will miss it's goal. Which it'll miss anyways because it's targeting the wrong people. All adults must have access to clean opiates if we're to get rid of fent.
  5. Splam African Astronaut
    Also, look how Trump is going completely medieval on China. He has asked Canada to take Huawei's CEO hostage until the trade negotiations are over - using her as potential leverage. Which is suspect to why her extradition trial is taking so long, stalling till trade negotiations are done.

    That's like something you'd do in the middle ages. Take the King's daughter hostage and use her to negotiate.
  6. Splam African Astronaut
    Originally posted by MexicanMasterRace Its objectively proven that Russia has interfered with elections in Europe and the US. The US has done it for years. Dont act so shocked, kid

    The claim here is that Russia hacked the DNC, exposing corrupt Hillary. Where's the proof of this beyond "the CIA says so"?
    It's more likely that republicans hacked the DNC - there's millions of Americans who wish to impact the elections. You don't need a government science lab to hack a computer - anyone can do it with the right skills. So I say it's more likely Americans themselves who did it. In any case, it's a moot point until evidence has been presented.
  7. Splam African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Technologist Well you’re not from the US, so there’s no “we” to it.



    Air defence systems are part of NORAD numnuts.
  8. Splam African Astronaut
    Actually a valid exercise. We need to be prepared for an attack on our GPS systems.
  9. Splam African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Technologist Don’t care, you got your attention for the day.

    Me or spectral?
  10. Splam African Astronaut
    You have as much basis for believing I am spectral, as you have believing Trump colluded with Russia or whatever.
    Conspiracies all of them.
  11. Splam African Astronaut
    Originally posted by -SpectraL Hello.

    It's a me.
  12. Splam African Astronaut
  13. Splam African Astronaut
    And overlooking possible corruption is the right thing to do?

    Hell I'd argue America shouldn't be giving Ukraine aid in the first place. It represents a conflict of interest to Ukraine. Makes them a US vassal state.
  14. Splam African Astronaut
    Originally posted by Star Trek VI: The Undiscovered Country Politics kinda runs on dirt. Maybe the issue is that Trump wasn't playing by the real rules of the game.

    Ding. Trump by being unapologetic was immune from the scandals that would've shook any other politician to his core.
  15. Splam African Astronaut
    You want to remove a president on a technicality where no intent can be proven. Not on any actual wrongdoing.
  16. Splam African Astronaut
    If Hunter Biden has nothing to hide, what is he afraid of?

    Obama would be right to investigate Trump's foreign business ventures too if they showed signs of corruption (which I'm sure they all do). No democrat would disagree with that. Not to mention all these politicians have way more than enough money to launch private investigations into each other and I'm certain they all do.
  17. Splam African Astronaut
    Again you can't criticize Trump for that, to the point you want him removed from office, without acknowledging Biden's past behaviour.
    You have to prove hard intent. If spewing out a sentence could criminalize anyone, we'd all be in prison.
  18. Splam African Astronaut
    What if Hunter Biden is actually corrupt? Then Trump is innocent. Hence in order to convict Trump you must clear Hunter.

    In any case, if Trump becomes a criminal for talking about withholding aid, then Biden should be convicted for actually withholding aid. Common law.
  19. Splam African Astronaut
    He made a request in line with the anti-corruption agreement with Ukraine.
    Him jokingly saying withholding aid put no pressure on Ukrainian officials and they've admit to this.
    Biden actually did withhold aid from Ukraine till they did as he said.
  20. Splam African Astronaut
    Again you're impeaching Trump for doing his fucking job.
    If he wasn't doing his job, and willfully overlooking possible corruption in Ukraine, then he should be impeached.

    Shall or must, he's simply overlooking possible corruption that just so happens to be the son of his political opponent. This is not illegal.

    He never actually withheld aid. If you're impeaching him based on intent, well then Bill Clinton intended on getting his dick sucked. It's too vague would never stand up in an actual court.
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. ...
  5. 51
  6. 52
  7. 53
  8. 54
  9. 55
  10. 56
  11. ...
  12. 60
  13. 61
  14. 62
  15. 63
Jump to Top